Type IV gypsum compatibility with five addition-reaction silicone impression materials

被引:11
|
作者
Butta, R [1 ]
Tredwin, CJ [1 ]
Nesbit, M [1 ]
Moles, DR [1 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Eastman Dept Inst, Dept Conservat Dent, London WC1X 8LD, England
来源
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY | 2005年 / 93卷 / 06期
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.04.006
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Statement of problem. The compatibility of current addition-reaction silicone impression materials and Type IV gypsum products is not completely understood. Purpose. The purpose of this study was to compare surface detail reproduction between various combinations of contemporary addition-reaction silicone impression materials and Type IV gypsum products. Material and methods. Under standardized conditions, 300 impressions were made of a ruled stainless steel die (ADA specification 19), using 5 addition-reaction silicones (Examix-NDS, Doric-ES Flo-Light, Panasil Contact Plus, Extrude Wash, and President Plus Jet). Fifteen impressions of each material were poured with each Type TV gypsum product (Silky-Rock, Fuji Rock, Suprastone, or Vel-Mix). Using x12 magnification, 2 independent examiners scored the reproducibility of a 20-mu m line in both the impression and the resultant casts. Statistical analysis was performed using 2-way analysis of variance and post hoc Bonferroni testing (alpha=.05). Results. All impression materials tested fully reproduced the 20-mu m line. Different impression materials showed different compatibility with different Type TV gypsum products. Only 25% of the Type IV gypsum casts completely reproduced the resultant 20-mu m line with fine margins, and 88% of the completely reproduced casts were made from Suprastone. Conclusion. Not all combinations of impression material and Type IV gypsum products used exhibited similar compatibility.
引用
收藏
页码:540 / 544
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] EVALUATION OF RETARDERS FOR ADDITION-REACTION SILICONE IMPRESSION MATERIALS
    STANNARD, JG
    SADIGHINOURI, M
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1984, 63 : 235 - 235
  • [2] CAPILLARY RHEOLOGY OF 2 ADDITION-REACTION SILICONE IMPRESSION MATERIALS
    SALEM, NAES
    WATTS, DC
    COMBE, EC
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1980, 59 : 1815 - 1815
  • [3] Effect of a Laboratory Surfactant on Compatibility of Type IV Dental Stones with Addition-Cured Silicone Impression Materials
    Tredwin, Christopher Jeremy
    Nesbit, Michael
    Butta, Rajeev
    Moles, David R.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS AND RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2008, 16 (02): : 73 - 76
  • [4] ADHESION OF ADDITION-REACTION TYPE SILICONE ELASTOMERS
    SUZUKI, T
    KASUYA, A
    JOURNAL OF ADHESION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1989, 3 (06) : 463 - 473
  • [5] PROPERTIES OF ADDITION-TYPE SILICONE IMPRESSION MATERIALS
    YEH, CL
    POWERS, JM
    CRAIG, RG
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1980, 59 : 287 - 287
  • [6] PROPERTIES OF ADDITION-TYPE SILICONE IMPRESSION MATERIALS
    YEH, CL
    POWERS, JM
    CRAIG, RG
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 1980, 101 (03): : 482 - 484
  • [7] COMPATIBILITY OF GYPSUM PRODUCTS WITH HYDROCOLLOID IMPRESSION MATERIALS
    EAMES, WB
    ROGERS, LB
    WALLACE, SW
    SUWAY, NB
    OPERATIVE DENTISTRY, 1978, 3 (03) : 108 - 112
  • [8] CURING CONTRACTION OF ADDITION-TYPE SILICONE IMPRESSION MATERIALS
    OHSAWA, M
    JORGENSEN, KD
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1983, 91 (01): : 51 - 54
  • [9] The influence of Latex gloves on addition reaction silicone impression materials.
    Rodrigues, LE
    Francci, C
    Muench, A
    Luebke, K
    Traina, AA
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2000, 79 : 616 - 616
  • [10] COMPATIBILITY OF TYPE-IV DENTAL STONES WITH POLYETHER IMPRESSION MATERIALS
    SCHELB, E
    CAVAZOS, E
    KAISER, DA
    TROENDLE, K
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1988, 60 (05): : 540 - 542