Co-benefits from energy policies in China

被引:116
|
作者
He, K. [1 ]
Lei, Y. [1 ]
Pan, X. [2 ]
Zhang, Y. [2 ]
Zhang, Q. [1 ,3 ]
Chen, D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Tsinghua Univ, Dept Environm Sci & Engn, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[2] Peking Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
[3] Argonne Natl Lab, Argonne, IL 60439 USA
基金
美国国家环境保护局; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Co-benefits; Energy policies; Scenario analysis; AIR-POLLUTION; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.energy.2008.07.021
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
The rapid growth in coal and oil consumption has led to increasing emissions of greenhouse gases as well as air pollutants in China. In response to this, the Chinese government has begun to formulate policies to retard the increasing use of energy consumption and to improve air quality. This paper attempts to quantify the co-benefits of reducing carbon dioxide emissions and improving air quality from policies that are originally formulated to improve energy efficiency and to abate emissions of air pollutants from energy use. The present authors have developed an integrated approach, combining an energy projection model, an emission estimation model, an air quality simulation model, and a health benefit evaluation model, to assess the co-benefits of two different sets of energy policies of China. The modeling results show that significant benefits, including 1469 million tonnes of reduced emissions of CO2, 12-32% decline in air pollutant concentrations, and more than 100 billion US$ of health benefit, can be achieved around the year 2030 if aggressive energy policies are implemented. The analyses suggest that such energy policies could do a lot of benefit to the environment. Moreover, better industry structure and energy structure is essential for higher air quality. (C) 2009 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:4265 / 4272
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Biodiversity co-benefits of policies to reduce forest-carbon emissions
    Jacob Phelps
    Edward L. Webb
    William M. Adams
    Nature Climate Change, 2012, 2 (7) : 497 - 503
  • [32] Biodiversity co-benefits of policies to reduce forest-carbon emissions
    Phelps, Jacob
    Webb, Edward L.
    Adams, William M.
    NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2012, 2 (07) : 497 - 503
  • [33] The politics of co-benefits in India's energy sector
    Mayrhofer, Jan
    Gupta, Joyeeta
    ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING C-GOVERNMENT AND POLICY, 2016, 34 (07): : 1344 - 1363
  • [34] Wind power projects in Brazil: challenges and opportunities increasing co-benefits and implications for climate and energy policies
    Goes, Maria de Fatima Barbosa
    Andrade, Jose Celio Silveira
    Jabbour, Charbel Jose Chiappetta
    Silva, Marcelo Santana
    ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 23 (10) : 15341 - 15367
  • [35] Co-benefits of post-2012 global climate mitigation policies
    Rafaj, Peter
    Schoepp, Wolfgang
    Russ, Peter
    Heyes, Chris
    Amann, Markus
    MITIGATION AND ADAPTATION STRATEGIES FOR GLOBAL CHANGE, 2013, 18 (06) : 801 - 824
  • [36] Health co-benefits of climate change mitigation policies in the transport sector
    Shaw C.
    Hales S.
    Howden-Chapman P.
    Edwards R.
    Nature Climate Change, 2014, 4 (6) : 427 - 433
  • [37] The politics of co-benefits in India's energy sector
    Mayrhofer, Jan
    Gupta, Joyeeta
    JOURNAL OF PLANNING LITERATURE, 2023, 38 (04) : 627 - 627
  • [38] Health co-benefits
    George D. Thurston
    Nature Climate Change, 2013, 3 : 863 - 864
  • [39] Health co-benefits of climate change mitigation policies in the transport sector
    Shaw, Caroline
    Hales, Simon
    Howden-Chapman, Philippa
    Edwards, Richard
    NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2014, 4 (06) : 427 - 433
  • [40] Nordic air quality co-benefits from European post-2012 climate policies
    Rypdal, Kristin
    Rive, Nathan
    Astrom, Stefan
    Karvosenoja, Niko
    Aunan, Kristin
    Bak, Jesper L.
    Kupiainen, Kaarle
    Kukkonen, Jaakko
    ENERGY POLICY, 2007, 35 (12) : 6309 - 6322