Comparison of toxicities between ultrahypofractionated radiotherapy versus brachytherapy with or without external beam radiotherapy for clinically localized prostate cancer

被引:3
|
作者
Yamazaki, Hideya [1 ]
Masui, Koji [1 ]
Suzuki, Gen [1 ]
Aibe, Norihiro [1 ]
Shimizu, Daisuke [1 ]
Kimoto, Takuya [1 ]
Yamada, Kei [1 ]
Ueno, Akihisa [2 ]
Matsugasumi, Toru [2 ]
Yamada, Yasuhiro [2 ]
Shiraishi, Takumi [2 ]
Fujihara, Atsuko [2 ]
Yoshida, Ken [3 ]
Nakamura, Satoaki [3 ]
机构
[1] Kyoto Prefectural Univ Med, Dept Radiol, Kamigyo Ku, 465 Kajiicho Kawaramachi Hirokoji, Kyoto 6028566, Japan
[2] Kyoto Prefectural Univ Med, Grad Sch Med Sci, Urol, Kamigyo Ku, 465 Kajiicho Kawaramachi Hirokoji, Kyoto 6028566, Japan
[3] Kansai Med Univ, Dept Radiol, Hirakata, Osaka 5731010, Japan
关键词
DOSE-RATE BRACHYTHERAPY; BODY RADIATION-THERAPY; BIOCHEMICAL CONTROL; TRIAL; SBRT; BOOST; MEN;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-022-09120-0
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
To compare gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicities in patients with localized prostate cancer treated with ultrahypofractionated radiotherapy (UHF) or brachytherapy [BT; low dose rate, LDR or high dose rate (HDR) with or without external beam radiotherapy (EBRT)]. We compared 253 UHF and 1664 BT +/- EBRT groups. The main outcomes were the incidence and severity of acute and late GU and GI toxicities. The secondary endpoint was biochemical control rate. Cumulative late actuarial GU toxicity did not differ for grade >= 2 (8.6% at 5-years in UHF and 13.3% in BT +/- EBRT, hazard ratio [HR], 0.7066; 95% CI, 0.4093-1.22, p = 0.2127). Actuarial grade >= 2 late GI toxicity was higher in UHF (5.8% at 5-years, HR: 3.619; 95% CI, 1.774-7.383, p < 0.001) than in BT +/- EBRT (1.1%). In detailed subgroup analyses, the high-dose UHF group (H-UHF) using BED >= 226 Gy(1.5), showed higher GI toxicity profiles than the other subgroups (HDR + EBRT, LDR + EBRT, and LDR monotherapy, and L-UHF BED < 226 Gy(1.5)) with equivalent GU toxicity to other modalities. With a median follow-up period of 32 months and 75 months, the actuarial biochemical control rates were equivalent between the UHF and BT +/- EBRT groups. UHF showed equivalent efficacy, higher GI and equivalent GU accumulated toxicity to BT +/- EBRT, and the toxicity of UHF was largely dependent on the UHF schedule.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of toxicities between ultrahypofractionated radiotherapy versus brachytherapy with or without external beam radiotherapy for clinically localized prostate cancer
    Hideya Yamazaki
    Koji Masui
    Gen Suzuki
    Norihiro Aibe
    Daisuke Shimizu
    Takuya Kimoto
    Kei Yamada
    Akihisa Ueno
    Toru Matsugasumi
    Yasuhiro Yamada
    Takumi Shiraishi
    Atsuko Fujihara
    Ken Yoshida
    Satoaki Nakamura
    Scientific Reports, 12
  • [2] High-dose-rate brachytherapy with external beam radiotherapy versus low-dose-rate brachytherapy with or without external beam radiotherapy for clinically localized prostate cancer
    Hideya Yamazaki
    Koji Masui
    Gen Suzuki
    Norihiro Aibe
    Daisuke Shimizu
    Takuya Kimoto
    Kei Yamada
    Akihisa Ueno
    Toru Matsugasumi
    Yasuhiro Yamada
    Takumi Shiraishi
    Atsuko Fujihara
    Koji Okihara
    Ken Yoshida
    Satoaki Nakamura
    Scientific Reports, 11
  • [3] High-dose-rate brachytherapy with external beam radiotherapy versus low-dose-rate brachytherapy with or without external beam radiotherapy for clinically localized prostate cancer
    Yamazaki, Hideya
    Masui, Koji
    Suzuki, Gen
    Aibe, Norihiro
    Shimizu, Daisuke
    Kimoto, Takuya
    Yamada, Kei
    Ueno, Akihisa
    Matsugasumi, Toru
    Yamada, Yasuhiro
    Shiraishi, Takumi
    Fujihara, Atsuko
    Okihara, Koji
    Yoshida, Ken
    Nakamura, Satoaki
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2021, 11 (01)
  • [4] Ultrahypofractionated Radiotherapy versus Conventional to Moderate Hypofractionated Radiotherapy for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer
    Yamazaki, Hideya
    Suzuki, Gen
    Aibe, Norihiro
    Shimizu, Daisuke
    Kimoto, Takuya
    Masui, Koji
    Yoshida, Ken
    Nakamura, Satoaki
    Hashimoto, Yasutoshi
    Okabe, Haruumi
    CANCERS, 2022, 14 (01)
  • [5] High-dose-rate brachytherapy monotherapy versus low-dose-rate brachytherapy with or without external beam radiotherapy for clinically localized prostate cancer
    Yamazaki, Hideya
    Masui, Koji
    Suzuki, Gen
    Nakamura, Satoaki
    Yamada, Kei
    Okihara, Koji
    Shiraishi, Takumi
    Yoshida, Ken
    Kotsuma, Tadayuki
    Tanaka, Eiichi
    Otani, Keisuke
    Yoshioka, Yasuo
    Ogawa, Kazuhiko
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2019, 132 : 162 - 170
  • [6] Predictive Models in External Beam Radiotherapy for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer
    Roach, Mack, III
    Waldman, Fred
    Pollack, Alan
    CANCER, 2009, 115 (13) : 3112 - 3120
  • [7] Clinical Outcome of High Dose Rate Brachytherapy with External Beam Radiotherapy for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer
    Inagaki, T.
    Kohjimoto, Y.
    Kusumoto, H.
    Ura, K.
    Nishizawa, S.
    Kikkawa, K.
    Kodama, Y.
    Koh, M.
    Matsumura, N.
    Hara, I
    UROLOGY, 2012, 80 (03) : S289 - S290
  • [8] External beam radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer
    Yilmaz, Hasan
    Aksu, Gorkem
    Dillioglugil, Ozdal
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF ANDROLOGY, 2015, 17 (06) : 892 - 898
  • [9] Determinants of the Combined Use of External Beam Radiotherapy and Brachytherapy for Low-Risk, Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer
    Quek, Ruben G. W.
    Master, Viraj A.
    Ward, Kevin C.
    Lin, Chun Chieh
    Virgo, Katherine S.
    Portier, Kenneth M.
    Lipscomb, Joseph
    CANCER, 2013, 119 (20) : 3619 - 3628
  • [10] Radical prostatectomy versus external beam radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer Comparison of treatment outcomes
    Kim, Yeon-Joo
    Cho, Kwan Ho
    Pyo, Hong Ryull
    Lee, Kang Hyun
    Moon, Sung Ho
    Kim, Tae Hyun
    Shin, Kyung Hwan
    Kim, Joo-Young
    Kim, Young-kyung
    Lee, Se Byeong
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2015, 191 (04) : 321 - 329