Randomized trials of endoscopic therapy and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt versus portacaval shunt for emergency and elective treatment of bleeding gastric varices in cirrhosis

被引:24
|
作者
Orloff, Marshall J. [1 ]
Hye, Robert J. [1 ]
Wheeler, Henry O. [2 ]
Isenberg, Jon I. [2 ]
Haynes, Kevin S. [2 ]
Vaida, Florin [3 ]
Girard, Barbara [1 ]
Orloff, Karen J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Diego, San Diego Med Ctr, Dept Surg, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Diego, San Diego Med Ctr, Dept Med, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
[3] Univ Calif San Diego, San Diego Med Ctr, Dept Family & Prevent Med Biostat & Bioinformat, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
TERM FOLLOW-UP; LIVER-TRANSPLANTATION; PORTAL-HYPERTENSION; ESOPHAGEAL-VARICES; HEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA; CONSORT STATEMENT; NATURAL-HISTORY; CLASSIFICATION; SURVIVAL; DEVASCULARIZATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.surg.2014.12.003
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Importance. Bleeding esophageal varices has been studied extensively, but bleeding gastric varices (BGV) has received much less investigation. However, BGV has been reported in <= 30 % of patients with acute variceal bleeding. In our studies of 1,836 bleeding cirrhotics, 12.7% were bleeding from gastric varices. BGV mortality rate of 45-55% has been reported. The BGV literature has mainly involved retrospective case reports, often with short-term follow-up. Objective. We sought to describe the results of a prospective, randomized, controlled trial (RCT) in unselected, consecutive patients with BGV comparing endoscopic therapy (ET) with portacaval shunt (PCS; n = 518), and later comparing emergency transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) with emergency portacaval shunt (EPCS; n = 70). Design, setting, and participants. Initially, our RCT involved 518 patients with BGV comparing ET with direct PCS regarding control of bleeding, mortality rate, and disability. When entry of patients ended, the RCT was expanded to compare emergency TIPS with EPCS (n = 70). This RCT of BGV was separate from our other RCTs of bleeding esophageal varices. Interventions. Initially, ET was compared with PCS. In the second part of our RCT, emergency TIPS was compared with emergency PCS (EPCS). Main outcome measures. Outcomes were survival, control of bleeding, portal-systemic encephalopathy (PSE), quality of life, and direct costs of care. In the RCT of ET versus PCS, 28 and 30%, respectively, were in Child class C. In the expanded RCT of TIPS versus EPCS, 40 and 4.1 %, respectively, were in Child class C. Permanent control of BGV was achieved in 97-100% of patients treated by emergency or elective PCS, compared with 27-29% by ET TIPS was even less effective, achieving long-term control of BGV in only 6%. Survival rates after PCS were greater at all time intervals and in all Child classes (P < .001). Repeated episodes of PSE occurred in 50% of TIPS patients, 16-17% treated by ET and 8-11% treated by PCS. Shunt stenosis or occlusion occurred in 67% of TIPS patients, in contrast with 0-2% of PCS patients. Conclusion. These results support the conclusion that PCS is uniformly effective, whereas ET and TIPS are not very effective.
引用
收藏
页码:1028 / 1045
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt for treatment of bleeding ectopic varices with portal hypertension
    Shibata, D
    Brophy, DP
    Gordon, FD
    Anastopoulos, HT
    Sentovich, SM
    Bleday, R
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1999, 42 (12) : 1581 - 1585
  • [22] Limitations of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt for management of gastric varices
    Matsumoto, A
    Matsushita, M
    Sugano, Y
    Takimoto, K
    Yasuda, M
    Inokuchi, H
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2004, 126 (01) : 380 - 381
  • [23] Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt versus H-graft portacaval shunt in the management of bleeding varices - A cost-benefit analysis - Reply
    Rosemurgy, A
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2006, 243 (01) : 140 - 140
  • [24] Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt versus H-graft portacaval shunt in the management of bleeding varices: A cost-benefit analysis - Discussion
    Apelgren, KN
    Rosemurgy
    Joehl, RJ
    Aburahma, A
    SURGERY, 1997, 122 (04) : 799 - 800
  • [25] Comparison of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt for treatment of variceal bleeding in patients with cirrhosis with or without spontaneous portosystemic shunt
    Leng, Xiafei
    Zhang, Feng
    Zhang, Ming
    Guo, Huiwen
    Yin, Xiaochun
    Xiao, Jiangqiang
    Wang, Yi
    Zou, Xiaoping
    Zhuge, Yuzheng
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2019, 31 (07) : 853 - 858
  • [26] Emergency Portacaval Shunt Versus Rescue Portacaval Shunt in a Randomized Controlled Trial of Emergency Treatment of Acutely Bleeding Esophageal Varices in Cirrhosis-Part 3
    Orloff, Marshall J.
    Isenberg, Jon I.
    Wheeler, Henry O.
    Haynes, Kevin S.
    Jinich-Brook, Horacio
    Rapier, Roderick
    Vaida, Florin
    Hye, Robert J.
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2010, 14 (11) : 1782 - 1795
  • [27] Transjugular Portosystemic Shunt for Treatment of Bleeding Stomal Varices
    Paul A. Johnson
    Jacqueline Laurin
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 1997, 42 : 440 - 442
  • [28] Transjugular portosystemic shunt for treatment of bleeding stomal varices
    Johnson, PA
    Laurin, J
    DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 1997, 42 (02) : 440 - 442
  • [29] Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt versus endoscopic therapy: Randomized trials for secondary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding: an updated meta-analysis
    Burroughs, AK
    Vangeli, N
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2002, 37 (03) : 249 - 252
  • [30] Prognostic factors with the use of the transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt for bleeding varices
    Tyburski, JG
    Noorily, MJ
    Wilson, RF
    ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 1997, 132 (06) : 626 - 631