DISPUTool A Tool for the Argumentative Analysis of Political Debates

被引:0
|
作者
Haddadan, Shohreh [1 ]
Cabrio, Elena [2 ]
Villata, Serena [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Luxembourg, Luxembourg, Luxembourg
[2] Univ Cote dAzur, CNRS, I3S, INRIA, Paris, France
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Political debates are the means used by political candidates to put forward and justify their positions in front of the electors with respect to the issues at stake. Argument mining is a novel research area in Artificial Intelligence, aiming at analyzing discourse on the pragmatics level and applying a certain argumentation theory to model and automatically analyze textual data. In this paper, we present DISPUTool, a tool designed to ease the work of historians and social science scholars in analyzing the argumentative content of political speeches. More precisely, DISPUTool allows to explore and automatically identify argumentative components over the 39 political debates from the last 50 years of US presidential campaigns (1960-2016).
引用
收藏
页码:6524 / 6526
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Political Debates - Consensus or Conflict
    Zsigmond, Csilla
    ARGUMENTOR: PROCEEDINGS OF THE FIRST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON TEACHING ARGUMENTATION AND RHETORIC, 2010, : 133 - 140
  • [42] Political identities in parliamentary debates
    van Dijk, Teun A.
    EUROPEAN PARLIAMENTS UNDER SCRUTINY: DISCOURSE STRATEGIES AND INTERACTION PRACTICES, 2010, 38 : 29 - 56
  • [43] DIAPHONY AND INTERACTION IN POLITICAL DEBATES
    TORCK, D
    LITTERATURE, 1994, (93): : 15 - 30
  • [44] Nonverbal communication in political debates
    Hinck, Robert S.
    ARGUMENTATION AND ADVOCACY, 2022, 58 (01): : 59 - 61
  • [45] Political and Philosophical Debates in Welfare
    Ginsburg, Norman
    CRITICAL SOCIAL POLICY, 2009, 29 (01) : 160 - 161
  • [46] Irony in political television debates
    Nuolijarvi, Pirkko
    Tiittula, Liisa
    JOURNAL OF PRAGMATICS, 2011, 43 (02) : 572 - 587
  • [47] Political and Philosophical Debates in Welfare
    Pullen, Annie
    ETHICS & SOCIAL WELFARE, 2009, 3 (01): : 102 - 103
  • [48] Debates in contemporary political philosophy
    Webb, M
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2003, 38 (03) : 581 - 582
  • [49] Contemporary Debates in Political Philosophy
    Marjoribanks, David
    POLITICAL STUDIES REVIEW, 2011, 9 (01) : 71 - 72
  • [50] Political discourse and tension: simplification and argumentative superficiality
    Velazquez Garcia-Talavera, Teresa
    DESIGNIS, 2020, (33): : 85 - 99