DISPUTool A Tool for the Argumentative Analysis of Political Debates

被引：0

作者：

Haddadan, Shohreh ^{[1
]}

Cabrio, Elena ^{[2
]}

Villata, Serena ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Luxembourg, Luxembourg, Luxembourg

[2] Univ Cote dAzur, CNRS, I3S, INRIA, Paris, France

来源：

PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWENTY-EIGHTH INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE | 2019年

关键词：

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

TP18 [人工智能理论];

学科分类号：

081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;

摘要：

Political debates are the means used by political candidates to put forward and justify their positions in front of the electors with respect to the issues at stake. Argument mining is a novel research area in Artificial Intelligence, aiming at analyzing discourse on the pragmatics level and applying a certain argumentation theory to model and automatically analyze textual data. In this paper, we present DISPUTool, a tool designed to ease the work of historians and social science scholars in analyzing the argumentative content of political speeches. More precisely, DISPUTool allows to explore and automatically identify argumentative components over the 39 political debates from the last 50 years of US presidential campaigns (1960-2016).

引用

页码：6524 / 6526

页数：3

共 50 条

[1] Dialogue organisation in argumentative debates
Cornillon, Jeanne
Rosenberg, Duska
AI & SOCIETY, 2005, 19 (01) : 48 - 64
[2] Political debates as a teaching tool in other contexts
de Miguel Molina, Maria
Catala Perez, Daniel
Albalat-Mascarell, Ana
CONGRESO NACIONAL DE INNOVACION EDUCATIVA Y DOCENCIA EN RED (IN RED 2017), 2017, : 383 - 389
[3] Microdebates App for Android: A tool for participating in argumentative online debates using a handheld device
Yaglikci, Nefise
Torroni, Paolo
2014 IEEE 26TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON TOOLS WITH ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (ICTAI), 2014, : 792 - 799
[4] Mediation of Debates with Dynamic Argumentative Behaviors
Hadoux, Emmanuel
Beynier, Aurelie
Maudet, Nicolas
Weng, Paul
COMPUTATIONAL MODELS OF ARGUMENT (COMMA 2018), 2018, 305 : 249 - 256
[5] Argumentative Analysis of the Electoral Debates in the Campaign 28-A: the Construction of the Enemy
Micovic, Miljana
Alsina Leal, Adria
Anaya Revuelta, Inmaculada
REVISTA LATINA DE COMUNICACION SOCIAL, 2020, (76): : 189 - 206
[6] ACTA A Tool for Argumentative Clinical Trial Analysis
Mayer, Tobias
Cabrio, Elena
Villata, Serena
PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWENTY-EIGHTH INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2019, : 6551 - 6553
[7] AN ANALYSIS OF MONOLOGUES AND DIALOGS IN POLITICAL DEBATES
EVERTS, D
COMMUNICATION AND COGNITION, 1989, 22 (3-4): : 375 - 381
[8] Freedom of conscience as political tool in 1980th debates
Shirokalova, G. S.
SOTSIOLOGICHESKIE ISSLEDOVANIYA, 2015, (03): : 89 - +
[9] ParlVote: A Corpus for Sentiment Analysis of Political Debates
Abercrombie, Gavin
Batista-Navarro, Riza
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON LANGUAGE RESOURCES AND EVALUATION (LREC 2020), 2020, : 5073 - 5078
[10] Argumentative Analysis in Diachrony: uses of Pathos in the French Parliamentary Debates on the Abolition of the Death Penalty
Micheli, Raphael
ARGUMENTATION ET ANALYSE DU DISCOURS, 2008, 1

← 1 2 3 4 5 →