Occupant response to wind-excited buildings: a multidisciplinary perspective

被引:7
|
作者
Lamb, Steve [1 ,2 ]
Macefield, Vaughan G. [3 ]
Walton, Darren [4 ]
Kwok, Kenny C. S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western Sydney, Inst Infrastruct Engn, Penrith, NSW, Australia
[2] Victoria Univ Wellington, Sch Architecture, Wellington, New Zealand
[3] Univ Western Sydney, Chair Integrat Physiol, Sch Med, Penrith, NSW, Australia
[4] Univ Canterbury, Dept Psychol, Christchurch, New Zealand
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
buildings; structures & design; health & safety; wind loading & aerodynamics; SYMPATHETIC-NERVE ACTIVITY; FREQUENCY PHYSIOLOGICAL ACTIVATION; SINUSOIDAL LINEAR ACCELERATION; MOTION SICKNESS; VESTIBULAR MODULATION; INDOOR ENVIRONMENTS; SOPITE SYNDROME; HUMANS; PERFORMANCE; UTRICLE;
D O I
10.1680/jstbu.15.00017
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The occupant response to wind-induced building motion is complex, governed by human physiology, and moderated by the psychological response to motion and discomfort within a sophisticated engineered environment. This paper aims to consolidate and critique the early research on the occupant response to building motion and to present recent multidisciplinary research that identifies a broader range of responses to, and consequences of, exposure to building motion. Recent field-based research shows that mild motion sickness, known as sopite syndrome, can cause significantly reduced work performance and occupant comfort. This is supported by laboratory-based physiological studies showing low-amplitude acceleration induces physiological changes in humans well below the threshold of motion perception (similar to 6.5 milli-g) which are consistent with the early onset of nausea. Current design criteria, based on perception thresholds, do not include the wider range of possible effects, particularly sopite syndrome and nausea. As a consequence, building occupants may suffer from a range of effects, including sopite syndrome and reduced work performance, that are not considered in current guidelines.
引用
收藏
页码:625 / 634
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Performance-based topology optimization for wind-excited tall buildings: A framework
    Bobby, Sarah
    Spence, Seymour M. J.
    Bernardini, Enrica
    Kareem, Ahsan
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2014, 74 : 242 - 255
  • [32] Extreme value of wind-excited response considering influence of bandwidth
    Huang, Guoqing
    Chen, Xinzhong
    Li, Mingshui
    Peng, Liuliu
    JOURNAL OF MODERN TRANSPORTATION, 2013, 21 (02): : 125 - 134
  • [33] Surrogate models for high performance control systems in wind-excited tall buildings
    Micheli, Laura
    Hong, Jonathan
    Laflamme, Simon
    Alipour, Alice
    APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2020, 90
  • [34] Mode shape linearization for HFBB analysis of wind-excited complex tall buildings
    Tse, K. T.
    Hitchcock, P. A.
    Kwok, K. C. S.
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2009, 31 (03) : 675 - 685
  • [35] Extreme value of wind-excited response considering influence of bandwidth
    Guoqing Huang
    Xinzhong Chen
    Mingshui Li
    Liuliu Peng
    Journal of Modern Transportation, 2013, (02) : 125 - 134
  • [36] Hybrid simulation of thunderstorm outflows and wind-excited response of structures
    Solari, Giovanni
    Rainisio, Davide
    De Gaetano, Patrizia
    MECCANICA, 2017, 52 (13) : 3197 - 3220
  • [37] Stochastic response estimation of wind-excited structures with uncertain parameters
    Jin, WL
    Song, ZG
    ADVANCES IN STOCHASTIC STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2003, : 247 - 253
  • [38] Hybrid simulation of thunderstorm outflows and wind-excited response of structures
    Giovanni Solari
    Davide Rainisio
    Patrizia De Gaetano
    Meccanica, 2017, 52 : 3197 - 3220
  • [39] Vibration control of wind-excited tall buildings using sliding mode fuzzy control
    Kim, SB
    Yun, CB
    Spencer, BF
    JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MECHANICS, 2004, 130 (04) : 505 - 510
  • [40] INELASTIC RESPONSES OF WIND-EXCITED TALL BUILDINGS WITH BILINEAR HYSTERETIC RESTORING FORCE CHARACTERISTICS
    Feng, Changda
    Chen, Xinzhong
    Fundamental Research in Structural Engineering: Retrospective and Prospective, Vols 1 and 2, 2016, : 176 - 188