Demand-pull and technology-push public support for eco-innovation: The case of the biofuels sector

被引:252
作者
Costantini, Valeria [1 ]
Crespi, Francesco [1 ,2 ]
Martini, Chiara [3 ]
Pennacchio, Luca [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rome Tre, Dept Econ, I-00146 Rome, Italy
[2] Coll Carlo Alberto, BRICK, Moncalieri, TO, Italy
[3] Italian Natl Agcy New Technol, Energy & Sustainable Econ Dev ENEA, Rome, Italy
[4] Univ Naples Federico II, Dept Econ & Stat, Naples, Italy
关键词
Eco-innovation; Biofuels; Demand-pull; Technology-push; Environmental policy; Patents; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL-POLICY; INTERNATIONAL DIFFUSION; PATENT CITATIONS; CLIMATE-CHANGE; IMPACT; DETERMINANTS; INCENTIVES; ECONOMICS; MODELS;
D O I
10.1016/j.respol.2014.12.011
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
The purpose of this paper is to explore the differentiated impact of demand-pull and technology-push policies in shaping technological patterns in the biofuels sector. The empirical analysis is based on a novel and original database (BioPat) containing patents in the field of biofuels selected using appropriate keywords and classified according to the technological content of the invention. Our results generally show that technological capabilities and environmental regulation spur innovative activities in the biofuels sector. Both demand-pull and technology-push factors are found to be important drivers of innovation in the biofuels sector. However, technology exploitation activities in first generation technologies are found to be mainly driven by quantity and price-based demand-pull policies. On the contrary, the pace of technology exploration efforts in advanced generation biofuels is shown to react positively to price-based demand-pull incentives but also to technology-push policy. The clear diversity in the impact of different public support instruments provides new insights which fuel discussion on the optimal policy mix debate and offers new elements for the design of future policy strategies. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:577 / 595
页数:19
相关论文
共 113 条
[71]   Technological change in economic models of environmental policy:: a survey [J].
Löschel, A .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2002, 43 (2-3) :105-126
[72]   EXPLORATION AND EXPLOITATION IN ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING [J].
March, James G. .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 1991, 2 (01) :71-87
[73]   Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects [J].
Markard, Jochen ;
Raven, Rob ;
Truffer, Bernhard .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2012, 41 (06) :955-967
[74]   Prices versus quantities: choosing policies for promoting the development of renewable energy [J].
Menanteau, P ;
Finon, D ;
Lamy, ML .
ENERGY POLICY, 2003, 31 (08) :799-812
[75]  
Metcalfe J. S., 1995, HDB EC INNOVATION
[76]   Technology policy and global warming: Why new policy models are needed (or why putting new wine in old bottles won't work) [J].
Mowery, David C. ;
Nelson, Richard R. ;
Martin, Ben R. .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2010, 39 (08) :1011-1023
[77]  
Narin F, 2000, MEASURING STRATEGIC
[78]  
Nelson Robert K., Mapping Inequality: Redlining in New Deal America
[79]   THE SIMPLE ECONOMICS OF BASIC SCIENTIFIC-RESEARCH [J].
NELSON, RR .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1959, 67 (03) :297-306
[80]   Demand-pull, technology-push, and government-led incentives for non-incremental technical change [J].
Nemet, Gregory F. .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2009, 38 (05) :700-709