The efficacy of psychotherapies and pharmacotherapies for mental disorders in adults: an umbrella review and meta-analytic evaluation of recent meta-analyses

被引:213
|
作者
Leichsenring, Falk [1 ,2 ]
Steinert, Christiane [1 ,3 ]
Rabung, Sven [4 ]
Ioannidis, John P. A. [5 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Giessen, Dept Psychosomat & Psychotherapy, Giessen, Germany
[2] Univ Rostock, Dept Psychosomat & Psychotherapy, Rostock, Germany
[3] Int Psychoanalyt Univ, Berlin, Germany
[4] Univ Klagenfurt, Dept Psychol, Klagenfurt, Austria
[5] Stanford Univ, Dept Med, Sch Med, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[6] Stanford Univ, Dept Epidemiol & Populat Hlth, Sch Med, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[7] Stanford Univ, Dept Biomed Data Sci, Sch Med, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
Psychotherapies; pharmacotherapies; mental disorders; randomized controlled trials; meta-analyses; effect sizes; meta-analytic evaluation; MAJOR DEPRESSIVE DISORDER; POSTTRAUMATIC-STRESS-DISORDER; GENERALIZED ANXIETY DISORDER; OBSESSIVE-COMPULSIVE DISORDER; BIPOLAR DISORDER; PSYCHOLOGICAL INTERVENTIONS; CLINICAL CHARACTERIZATION; SOCIAL ANXIETY; PHARMACOLOGICAL-TREATMENTS; NETWORK METAANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1002/wps.20941
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Mental disorders represent a worldwide public health concern. Psychotherapies and pharmacotherapies are recommended as first line treatments. However, evidence has emerged that their efficacy may be overestimated, due to a variety of shortcomings in clinical trials (e.g., publication bias, weak control conditions such as waiting list). We performed an umbrella review of recent meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of psychotherapies and pharmacotherapies for the main mental disorders in adults. We selected meta-analyses that formally assessed risk of bias or quality of studies, excluded weak comparators, and used effect sizes for target symptoms as primary outcome. We searched PubMed and PsycINFO and individual records of the Cochrane Library for meta-analyses published between January 2014 and March 2021 comparing psychotherapies or pharmacotherapies with placebo or treatment-as-usual (TAU), or psychotherapies vs. pharmacotherapies head-to-head, or the combination of psychotherapy with pharmacotherapy to either monotherapy. One hundred and two meta-analyses, encompassing 3,782 RCTs and 650,514 patients, were included, covering depressive disorders, anxiety disorders, post-traumatic stress disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, somatoform disorders, eating disorders, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, substance use disorders, insomnia, schizophrenia spectrum disorders, and bipolar disorder. Across disorders and treatments, the majority of effect sizes for target symptoms were small. A random effect meta-analytic evaluation of the effect sizes reported by the largest meta-analyses per disorder yielded a standardized mean difference (SMD) of 0.34 (95% CI: 0.26-0.42) for psychotherapies and 0.36 (95% CI: 0.32-0.41) for pharmacotherapies compared with placebo or TAU. The SMD for head-to-head comparisons of psychotherapies vs. pharmacotherapies was 0.11 (95% CI: -0.05 to 0.26). The SMD for the combined treatment compared with either monotherapy was 0.31 (95% CI: 0.19-0.44). Risk of bias was often high. After more than half a century of research, thousands of RCTs and millions of invested funds, the effect sizes of psychotherapies and pharmacotherapies for mental disorders are limited, suggesting a ceiling effect for treatment research as presently conducted. A paradigm shift in research seems to be required to achieve further progress.
引用
收藏
页码:133 / 145
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] What is the quality of the implemented meta-analytic procedures in chronic pain treatment meta-analyses?
    Fishbain, D
    Cutler, RB
    Rosomoff, HL
    Rosomoff, RS
    CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2000, 16 (01): : 73 - 85
  • [32] Meta-analytic Decisions and Reliability: A Serendipitous Case of Three Independent Telecommuting Meta-analyses
    Levi R. G. Nieminen
    Jessica M. Nicklin
    Tara K. McClure
    Madhura Chakrabarti
    Journal of Business and Psychology, 2011, 26 : 105 - 121
  • [33] A Meta-Analytic Review of Psychotherapy Efficacy in China
    Xu, Hui
    Tracey, Terence J. G.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 51 : 281 - 282
  • [34] Efficacy of ECT in depression: A meta-analytic review
    Pagnin, D
    de Queiroz, V
    Pini, S
    Cassano, GB
    JOURNAL OF ECT, 2004, 20 (01) : 13 - 20
  • [35] Anger treatment for adults: A meta-analytic review
    DiGiuseppe, R
    Tafrate, RC
    CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY-SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2003, 10 (01) : 70 - 84
  • [36] Risk factors and peripheral biomarkers for schizophrenia spectrum disorders: an umbrella review of meta-analyses
    Belbasis, L.
    Kohler, C. A.
    Stefanis, N.
    Stubbs, B.
    van Os, J.
    Vieta, E.
    Seeman, M. V.
    Arango, C.
    Carvalho, A. F.
    Evangelou, E.
    ACTA PSYCHIATRICA SCANDINAVICA, 2018, 137 (02) : 88 - 97
  • [37] Common mental disorders prevalence in adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analyses
    Silva, Sara Araujo
    Silva, Simoni Urbano
    Ronca, Debora Barbosa
    Santos Goncalves, Vivian Siqueira
    Dutra, Eliane Said
    Baiocchi Carvalho, Kenia Mara
    PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (04):
  • [38] Efficacy of relapse prevention: A meta-analytic review
    Irvin, JE
    Bowers, CA
    Dunn, ME
    Wang, MC
    JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1999, 67 (04) : 563 - 570
  • [39] The association between adverse childhood experiences and common mental disorders and suicidality: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses
    Sahle, Berhe W.
    Reavley, Nicola J.
    Li, Wenjing
    Morgan, Amy J.
    Yap, Marie Bee Hui
    Reupert, Andrea
    Jorm, Anthony F.
    EUROPEAN CHILD & ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY, 2022, 31 (10) : 1489 - 1499
  • [40] The association between adverse childhood experiences and common mental disorders and suicidality: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses
    Berhe W. Sahle
    Nicola J. Reavley
    Wenjing Li
    Amy J. Morgan
    Marie Bee Hui Yap
    Andrea Reupert
    Anthony F. Jorm
    European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 2022, 31 : 1489 - 1499