Comparative study of environmental impact of three-leather process production by life cycle analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Mahdi, Sarra [1 ]
Messaoud-Boureghda, Mohamed-Zine [1 ]
Aksas, Hamouche [1 ]
机构
[1] Mhamed Bougara Univ Boumerdes Algeria, Fac Technol, Res Lab Food Technol, Boumerdes 35000, Algeria
关键词
Chromium; Eco-indicator; 99; Environmental impacts; Leather; Life cycle analysis; Vegetable tanning agent; TANNERY WASTE-WATER; MANAGEMENT; BENEFITS; INDUSTRY; OPTIONS; EFFICIENCY; POLLUTION; EFFLUENT; SULFATE; SYSTEMS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
O69 [应用化学];
学科分类号
081704 ;
摘要
The present work aims to study the substitution of chromium in a very polluting tanning process using an alternative tanning process. For this, three scenarios (S) have been adopted; S1: Vegetal/aluminum combination, S2: vegetable alone and S3: aluminum only. The environmental impact of the three systems has been carried by Life Cycle Analysis (LCA) using the LCA Simapro 8 tool software. The chemical reagents, water process and electricity consumption of the wastewater are responsible for all generated impacts by these scenarios. The results obtained show that the ratio of process water (water / leather) is 2 L / m(2) for S1 and 2.7 L / m(2), 1.56 L / m(2) respectively for S2 and S3. Also, it should be noted that the chemical quantities used for 1 m(2) of leather for S1, S2 and S3 are respectively 1.446, 0.099 and 1.44 kg. The LCA assessment shows that S2 has the least environmental impact than S1 and S3. The weighted results (single score) that S2-senario presents advantages such as land use and organic respiration, given that vegetal tannin is biodegradable; because it is mainly exploitation of tannins coming from the forests, necessary for the preservation of flora and fauna.
引用
收藏
页码:305 / 318
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Environmental impact assessment of red mud utilization in concrete production: a life cycle assessment study
    Saeed Morsali
    Feriha Yildirim
    Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2024, 26 : 12219 - 12238
  • [42] Environmental comparison metrics for life cycle impact assessment and process design
    Pennington, DW
    Norris, G
    Hoagland, T
    Bare, JC
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRESS, 2000, 19 (02): : 83 - 91
  • [43] Environmental life cycle impact as a tool for process optimisation of a utility plant
    Eliceche, Ana M.
    Corvalan, Sergio M.
    Martinez, Pablo
    COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2007, 31 (5-6) : 648 - 656
  • [44] Life cycle impact analysis of cadmium in CdTePV production
    Fthenakis, VM
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2004, 8 (04): : 303 - 334
  • [45] Environmental impact of microbial protein from potato wastewater as feed ingredient: Comparative consequential life cycle assessment of three production systems and soybean meal
    Spiller, Marc
    Muys, Maarten
    Papini, Gustavo
    Sakarika, Myrsini
    Buyle, Matthias
    Vlaeminck, Siegfried E.
    WATER RESEARCH, 2020, 171
  • [46] Environmental impact of beef production in Mexico through life cycle assessment
    Rivera Huerta, Adriana
    Patricia Guereca, Leonor
    Rubio Lozano, Maria de la Salud
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2016, 109 : 44 - 53
  • [47] Life cycle assessment to evaluate the environmental impact of arable crop production
    Brentrup, F
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2003, 8 (03): : 156 - 156
  • [48] Life cycle environmental impact assessment of titanium dioxide production in China
    Dai, Yue
    Dong, Huijuan
    Sun, Luxuan
    Li, Jinze
    Zhang, Tianyu
    Geng, Yong
    Liu, Zhe
    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2024, 105
  • [49] Carbon nanofiber production: Life cycle energy consumption and environmental impact
    Khanna, Vikas
    Bakshi, Bhavik R.
    Lee, L. James
    JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2008, 12 (03) : 394 - 410
  • [50] Life Cycle assessment to evaluate the environmental impact of arable crop production
    Frank Brentrup
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2003, 8 : 156 - 156