Expert Opinions in Court: Liability of the Expert

被引:0
|
作者
Schiltenwolf, Marcus [1 ]
Beckmann, Nickolas [1 ]
Gaidzik, Peter [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Klinikum Heidelberg, Zentrum Orthopadie Unfallchirurg & Paraplegiol, Schlierbacher Landstr 200a, D-69118 Heidelberg, Germany
[2] Univ Witten Herdecke, Inst Med Recht, Witten, Germany
来源
关键词
legal hearing; oral explanation; duty to appear; bias; liability;
D O I
10.1055/s-0043-116798
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Experts in criminal, civil and, increasingly, in social court cases have to present their expert opinions in court. This should be regarded not only as a burden, even if this may at times appear superfluous to the expert, perhaps because the discussion is mere repetition of the opinion he has already written, or because the questions appear to be biased against the expert. Nonetheless, the expert is always advised to appear calm and objective during the interrogation by judges and parties or participants and their legal representatives, and should not allow himself or herself to be provoked by questioning. Furthermore, it may be necessary to correct the written expert statement in the course of the interrogation, but this can be a sign of a truly competent medical expert. The expert consulted can be held liable for adverse health effects resulting from the interrogation and investigation, as well as for deliberate or grossly faulty reports.
引用
收藏
页码:727 / 731
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] THE EXPERT WITNESS IN COURT
    ENGLAND, L
    JOURNAL OF THE MARKET RESEARCH SOCIETY, 1985, 27 (03): : 199 - 203
  • [42] GRAY ZONE EXPERT OPINIONS
    Darrow, Kaleb R.
    Luo, Leo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2023, 116 (05): : 974 - 974
  • [43] EXPERT OPINIONS ON SOCIAL SECURITY
    ALBRECHT, G
    JAHRBUCHER FUR NATIONALOKONOMIE UND STATISTIK, 1966, 179 (06): : 538 - 549
  • [44] Confidence in aggregation of expert opinions
    Budescu, DV
    Rantilla, AK
    ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2000, 104 (03) : 371 - 398
  • [45] Synopsis of Expert Opinions and Conclusions
    Skolnick, Phil
    White, David
    Acri, Jane B.
    CNS & NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS-DRUG TARGETS, 2015, 14 (06) : 773 - 776
  • [46] Some expert opinions on the Internet
    Dern, DP
    COMMUNICATIONS NEWS, 1996, 33 (04): : 53 - 53
  • [47] Resolving differing expert opinions
    Montani, Isabelle
    Marquis, Raymond
    Anthonioz, Nicole Egli
    Champod, Christophe
    SCIENCE & JUSTICE, 2019, 59 (01) : 1 - 8
  • [48] Medizinische GutachtenMedical expert opinions
    Andreas J. Gross
    C. Süfke
    H. Schülke
    M. Lindemann
    Zeitschrift für Rheumatologie, 2023, 82 (9) : 776 - 783
  • [49] Balance of opinions in expert panels
    Gong, Qiang
    Yang, Huanxing
    ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2018, 170 : 151 - 154
  • [50] Expert opinions on the APAP - Conclusion
    Guelfi, J. D.
    ENCEPHALE-REVUE DE PSYCHIATRIE CLINIQUE BIOLOGIQUE ET THERAPEUTIQUE, 2009, : S123 - S124