Effect of landfill leachate ageing on ultrafiltration performance and membrane fouling behaviour

被引:18
|
作者
Collado, Sergio [1 ]
Nunez, Daniel [1 ]
Oulego, Paula [1 ]
Riera, Francisco A. [1 ]
Diaz, Mario [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oviedo, Dept Chem & Environm Engn, C Julian Claveria S-N, E-33071 Oviedo, Spain
关键词
Landfill leachate; Wastewater management; Ageing; Ultrafiltration; Fouling modelling; HUMIC-ACID; ORGANIC-MATTER; FILTRATION; MICROFILTRATION; MECHANISMS; OXIDATION; FLUX; IDENTIFICATION; SUBSTANCES; PARAMETERS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jwpe.2020.101291
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In this study, the effect of ageing on the performance and fouling mechanisms in the ultrafiltration of landfill leachates using titania-zirconia (ZrO2-TiO2) tubular membrane was thoroughly studied. Results revealed that the maturation of the leachate has a positive effect on its ultrafiltration, with a twofold higher final permeability compared with the young one. This is the result of the higher organic load, particularly that corresponding to proteins and carbohydrates, of the young leachate. Resistance-in-series analysis demonstrated that the loss of permeability was mainly due to reversible fouling, caused by cake filtration. Either irrecoverable or irreversible fouling were scarce and not conditioned by the stage of maturation of the leachate. Chemical oxygen demand (COD) rejection for the mature leachate varied with volume concentration ratio (VCR) following an approximately sigmoidal shape, from an initial value of 18.5% to a final one of 49.6%, with the faster increase at VCR ranging from 1.2 to 1.7, due to the permeation of fatty acids by the ultrafiltration (UF) membrane. On the other hand, COD rejection remained approximately constant at 48% during the ultrafiltration of the young leachate, which can be attributed to the presence of higher molecular weight compounds in its composition.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Performance of anaerobic membrane bioreactor treating landfill leachate
    Kevser Cirik
    Serdar Gocer
    Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering, 2020, 18 : 383 - 393
  • [22] Performance of anaerobic membrane bioreactor treating landfill leachate
    Cirik, Kevser
    Gocer, Serdar
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2020, 18 (02) : 383 - 393
  • [23] SEPARATION OF LANDFILL LEACHATE WITH POLYMERIC ULTRAFILTRATION MEMBRANES
    SYZDEK, AC
    AHLERT, RC
    JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 1984, 9 (02) : 209 - 220
  • [24] Performance of three ultrafiltration ceramic membranes in reducing polluting load of landfill leachate
    Zait, Mohamed
    Benalla, Soukayna
    Bachiri, Basma
    Tahaikt, Mustapha
    Dhiba, Driss
    Elmida, Azzedine
    Taky, Mohamed
    DESALINATION AND WATER TREATMENT, 2021, 240 : 33 - 42
  • [25] Study of Membrane Fouling Properties of Landfill Leachate Treatment by the SBAC-MBR Process
    Wang, Guangzhi
    Huang, Likun
    Xia, Zhi
    ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 2016, 33 (12) : 978 - 985
  • [26] Effect of monovalent cations on ultrafiltration membrane fouling of protein
    Miao, Rui (395832936@qq.com), 1792, Chinese Society for Environmental Sciences (37):
  • [27] Effect and mechanism of ultrafiltration membrane fouling removal by ozonation
    You, Shu-Hai
    Tseng, Dyi-Hwa
    Hsu, Wei-Chun
    DESALINATION, 2007, 202 (1-3) : 224 - 230
  • [28] The effect of operating conditions and chemicals on ultrafiltration membrane Fouling
    Mohammadi, T
    Madaeni, SS
    Mahdyarfar, M
    Moghadam, MK
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2003, 27 (B2): : 329 - 335
  • [29] EFFECT OF ANTIFOAM FOULING ON SOLUTE REJECTION BY ULTRAFILTRATION MEMBRANE
    YAMAGIWA, K
    KOBAYASHI, H
    OHKAWA, A
    ONODERA, M
    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING OF JAPAN, 1993, 26 (01) : 18 - 20
  • [30] Effect of organic fouling on micro-pollutant rejection in membrane bioreactor treating municipal solid waste landfill leachate
    Sanguanpak, Samunya
    Chiemchaisri, Chart
    Chiemchaisri, Wilai
    Yamamoto, Kazuo
    WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 72 (04) : 561 - 571