Temporal resolution of dichoptic and second-order motion mechanisms

被引:26
|
作者
Derrington, A
Cox, M
机构
[1] Univ Nottingham, Dept Psychol, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
[2] Univ Bradford, Dept Optometry, Bradford BD7 1DP, W Yorkshire, England
基金
英国惠康基金;
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0042-6989(98)00050-9
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
We addressed the question of whether low-level motion analysers can integrate signals binocularly. We compared the temporal sensitivity in motion discrimination tasks using monocular and dichoptic first-order motion and monocular and dichoptic second-order motion. Three human observers were required to discriminate the direction of motion of either sinusoidal gratings (1 c/deg), used as a stimulus for first-order motion analysers, or the envelopes of contrast-modulated stationary sinusoidal gratings (carrier frequency 5 c/deg, carrier contrast 0.1, modulation frequency 1 c/deg), used as a stimulus for second-order motion analysers. Contrast sensitivity was measured as a function of temporal frequency. The moving grating or envelope was generated by summing two non-moving sinusoidally flickering gratings or envelopes in spatiotemporal quadrature. These were either combined monocularly or presented dichoptically. Sensitivity to the moving envelope was highest at a temporal frequency between 0.5 and 2 Hz, depending on the observer, and declined rapidly at high temporal frequencies. None of the observers was able to discriminate the direction of motion of envelopes moving faster than 4 Hz. Dichoptic and monocular presentation produced very similar results. Sensitivity to a monocularly presented moving grating was fairly uniform between 1 and 8 Hz, and declined slightly at 16 Hz. In one of three observers sensitivity to the dichoptically presented grating was very close to that of the monocularly presented grating at all temporal frequencies tested (from 1 to 16 Hz) All observers could discriminate the direction of motion of the dichoptically presented grating at 8 Hz, but two of the three were unable to discriminate its direction of motion at 16 Hz. These results indicate that second-order motion analysers have very poor temporal resolution and that dichoptic motion analysers have very good resolution. We suggest that this implies that there are low-level motion analysers that are capable of integrating information binocularly. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:3531 / 3539
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Second-order motion shifts perceived position
    Bressler, DW
    Whitney, D
    VISION RESEARCH, 2006, 46 (6-7) : 1120 - 1128
  • [42] Inefficient visual search for second-order motion
    Ashida, H
    Seiffert, AE
    Osaka, N
    JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA A-OPTICS IMAGE SCIENCE AND VISION, 2001, 18 (09): : 2255 - 2266
  • [43] Second-order temporal modulation transfer functions
    Lorenzi, C
    Soares, C
    Vonner, T
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2001, 110 (02): : 1030 - 1038
  • [44] Heading judgement from second-order motion
    Hanada, M
    Ejima, Y
    VISION RESEARCH, 2000, 40 (24) : 3319 - 3331
  • [45] Second-order Temporal Pooling for Action Recognition
    Cherian, Anoop
    Gould, Stephen
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER VISION, 2019, 127 (04) : 340 - 362
  • [46] A turbulence model: Second-order temporal accuracy
    Zhang, Yuanshuang
    Huang, Pengzhan
    PHYSICS OF FLUIDS, 2024, 36 (11)
  • [47] Second-order Temporal Pooling for Action Recognition
    Anoop Cherian
    Stephen Gould
    International Journal of Computer Vision, 2019, 127 : 340 - 362
  • [48] Centrifugal bias for second-order but not first-order motion
    Dumoulin, SO
    Baker, CL
    Hess, RF
    JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA A-OPTICS IMAGE SCIENCE AND VISION, 2001, 18 (09) : 2179 - 2189
  • [49] Second-order motion conveys depth-order information
    Hegdé, J
    Albright, TD
    Stoner, GR
    JOURNAL OF VISION, 2004, 4 (10): : 838 - 842
  • [50] The temporal properties of first-order and second-order vision
    Schofield, A
    Georgeson, MA
    PERCEPTION, 1998, 27 (12) : 1489 - 1489