Outcomes of repeat penetrating keratoplasty and risk factors for graft failure

被引:102
|
作者
Weisbrod, DJ [1 ]
Sit, M [1 ]
Naor, J [1 ]
Slomovic, AR [1 ]
机构
[1] Toronto Western Hosp, Univ Hlth Network, Dept Ophthalmol, Toronto, ON M5T 2S8, Canada
关键词
penetrating keratoplasty; repeat; regraft; survival; risk factors;
D O I
10.1097/00003226-200307000-00008
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose. To compare repeat penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) with primary PKP with respect to patient characteristics, survival rates, and risk factors for graft failure. Methods. Retrospective, consecutive, noncomparative case series of 116 patients who underwent repeat PKP and who were identified from a cohort of 696 PKPs performed by one surgeon over a 7.5-year period. Results. Compared with patients who underwent primary PKP, regraft patients were 5 years older, had a higher rate of peripheral anterior synechiae (PAS), were more likely to require intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering medications prior to surgery, were more likely to develop postoperative corneal neovascularization, were less likely to be phakic, and were more likely to undergo PKP in conjunction with a lens procedure. There was no difference between the two groups with respect to the distribution of original diagnoses leading to PKP and the rate of graft rejection. Two- and 5-year survival rates for repeat PKP were 63.9% and 45.6%, respectively. In a multivariate analysis, the original diagnosis leading to corneal transplantation, the presence of preoperative PAS, intraoperative anterior vitrectomy, and postoperative corneal neovascularization were identified as risk factors for graft failure in patients undergoing a regraft. Conclusions. Patients undergoing PKP for the first and second time share common risk factors for graft failure, namely, the original diagnosis leading to corneal transplantation, the presence of preoperative PAS, and the occurrence of postoperative corneal neovascularization. The difference in graft survival rates between the two groups can be partially explained on the basis of higher rates of the latter two risk factors among regrafts.
引用
收藏
页码:429 / 434
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Risk factors for failure of simultaneous penetrating keratoplasty and cataract extraction
    Bersudsky, V
    Rehany, U
    Rumelt, S
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2004, 30 (09): : 1940 - 1947
  • [22] Repeat corneal transplantation in Southern China: Indications, surgical technique, outcomes, and risk factors for repeat keratoplasty failure
    Zheng, Qiaolan
    Zheng, Qinxiang
    Chen, Wuhe
    Li, Jinyang
    Zhao, Zelin
    Wang, Haiou
    Jiang, Dan
    Chen, Wei
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2024, 72 (SUPPL 3) : S482 - S487
  • [23] Repeat corneal transplantation in Auckland, New Zealand: Indications, visual outcomes and risk factors for repeat keratoplasty failure
    Lu, Lucy M.
    Boyle, Alexander B.
    Niederer, Rachael L.
    Brookes, Nigel H.
    McGhee, Charles N. J.
    Patel, Dipika V.
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2019, 47 (08): : 987 - 994
  • [24] Risk factors for corneal graft rejection after penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus
    Alsubaie, Hamad
    Alrubaian, Ahmad
    Ahmad, Khabir
    Ahad, Muhammad Ali
    INTERNATIONAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2024, 44 (01)
  • [25] Comparison of outcomes of penetrating keratoplasty versus Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty for penetrating keratoplasty graft failure due to corneal edema
    Kitzmann, Anna S.
    Wandling, George R.
    Sutphin, John E.
    Goins, Kenneth M.
    Wagoner, Michael D.
    INTERNATIONAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2012, 32 (01) : 15 - 23
  • [26] Comparison of outcomes of penetrating keratoplasty versus Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty for penetrating keratoplasty graft failure due to corneal edema
    Anna S. Kitzmann
    George R. Wandling
    John E. Sutphin
    Kenneth M. Goins
    Michael D. Wagoner
    International Ophthalmology, 2012, 32 : 15 - 23
  • [27] Impact of gender mismatch on corneal graft rejection and rejection-related graft failure in repeat penetrating keratoplasty
    Chuckpaiwong, Varintorn
    Jongkhajornpong, Passara
    Rajsirisongsri, Pongthep
    Sontichai, Vachira
    Nijvipakul, Sarayut
    Lekhanont, Kaevalin
    PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (10):
  • [28] Repeat penetrating keratoplasty: indications, graft survival, and visual outcome
    Al-Mezaine, H
    Wagoner, MD
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2006, 90 (03) : 324 - 327
  • [29] Clinical Outcomes of Repeat Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty After Graft Failure
    Laouani, Achraf
    Vasiliauskaite, Indre
    Bourgonje, Vincent J. A.
    Ghaly, Mohamed
    Lanser, Charlotte
    van Lieshout, Isabel
    Baydoun, Lamis
    Kocaba, Viridiana
    Melles, Gerrit R. J.
    Oellerich, Silke
    CORNEA, 2025, 44 (04) : 455 - 462
  • [30] Repeat Penetrating Keratoplasty
    Cavanagh, H. Dwight
    OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2012, 119 (04) : 882 - 882