Risk Prioritization and Management in Gas Stations by using Fuzzy AHP and IPA Analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Mohsin, Muhammad [1 ]
Wang Zhan-ao [2 ]
Zhang Shijun [2 ]
Huang Weilun [2 ]
Yin Hengbin [2 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang YueXiu Univ Foreign Languages, Coll Int Finance & Trade, Shaoxing 312000, Peoples R China
[2] Wenzhou Business Coll, Sch Finance & Trade, Wenzhou 325035, Peoples R China
来源
JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC & INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH | 2021年 / 80卷 / 12期
关键词
Analytic hierarchy process; Gasoline; Importance performance analysis; Quality function development; Risk administration; Risk ranking; SAFETY; PERFORMANCE; BENZENE; POLYMORPHISMS; PERCEPTION; ACCIDENTS; VEHICLES; INDUSTRY; WORKERS; MODEL;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Gasoline industry is the main pillar of Pakistan's economy and is of immense importance. This industry is confronted by diverse risks which significantly affect its performance resulting in decreased economic contribution. On the other side, published literature merely analyzes this industry and suggests directions to improve it. Thus, this study is a kickoff step in this regard, and its purpose is to study the relationship between risk factors, importance, and performance of gasoline industry, which is based on questionnaire data collected from three districts, viz., Gujranwala, Gujrat and Sialkot of Punjab, Pakistan. In total, 159 completed questionnaires were collected having consistency ratio (CR) less than 0.1. Acquired stats were investigated using the latest techniques of multi-criteria decision making routines, viz., fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (Fuzzy AHP) and importance performance analysis (IPA) software Expert Choice 2000. Among the five main risk types faced by gasoline industry, transportation / tanker unloading (importance, 0.467: rank, 1) was the most, whereas, the least significant factor was miscellaneous category (importance, 0.049: rank, 5). Moreover, the most significant factor which showed high importance with high performance was driving carelessness / accidents (importance, 0.278; performance, 3.32), high importance with low performance was uncontrolled vapor released (importance, 0.087; performance, 2.53), low importance with low performance was fire / explosion (importance, 0.021; performance, 2.66) and low importance with high performance was overfill / crossover (importance, 0.027; performance, 4.11). Thus, this work identifies, prioritizes and highlights the areas where improvement is needed to encounter risk and increase quality function development of gas stations.
引用
收藏
页码:1107 / 1116
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Management of Electronic Journals using Fuzzy AHP Methodology
    Stefano, N. M.
    Casarotto Filho, N.
    Barichello, R.
    IEEE LATIN AMERICA TRANSACTIONS, 2015, 13 (01) : 330 - 336
  • [32] Accessing Occupational Health Risks Posed by Fishermen Based on Fuzzy AHP and IPA Methods: Management and Performance Perspectives
    Yan, Jin-Ling
    Xue, Yong-Jie
    Mohsin, Muhammad
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (20)
  • [33] Measuring the effectiveness of AHP and fuzzy AHP models in environmental risk assessment of a gas power plant
    Saffarian, Shabnam
    Mahmoudi, Armin
    Shafiee, Mohsen
    Jasemi, Milad
    Hashemi, Leila
    HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT, 2020, 27 (05): : 1227 - 1241
  • [34] Analysis of the information management system in the manufacturing process of cigarette enterprises using fuzzy AHP
    Song Gang
    Wang Xiaoming
    Wu Junfeng
    Li Shufang
    Liu Zhuowen
    Wang, Xiaodong
    JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2021, 40 (04) : 8257 - 8267
  • [35] Green Supply Chain Management, Triple Bottom Line, and Organizational Theory - Prioritization with Fuzzy AHP Method
    Thamsatitdej, P.
    Jongpaiboon, M.
    Samaranayake, P.
    Laosirihongthong, T.
    2015 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT (IEEM), 2015, : 1588 - 1592
  • [36] A Comparative Analysis of Classical AHP, Fuzzy AHP, and Z-Fuzzy AHP Methods for Flood Risk Assessment in Buyukcekmece District
    Kilic, Gulsah
    Altintas, Oguz
    INTELLIGENT AND FUZZY SYSTEMS, INFUS 2024 CONFERENCE, VOL 1, 2024, 1088 : 120 - 127
  • [37] Risk analysis in green supply chain using fuzzy AHP approach: A case study
    Mangla, Sachin Kumar
    Kumar, Pradeep
    Barua, Mukesh Kumar
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2015, 104 : 375 - 390
  • [38] Prioritization of drivers, enablers and resistors of agri-logistics in an emerging economy using fuzzy AHP
    Jakhar, Meenakshi
    Srivastava, Manoj Kumar
    BRITISH FOOD JOURNAL, 2018, 120 (09): : 2166 - 2181
  • [39] Prioritization and taxonomy of factors related to environmental tax reform (ETR) using fuzzy AHP approach
    Shahamabad, Mahdi Askari
    Rahimi, Alireza
    Shamsadini, Kazem
    Hemmatabad, Milad Shafiee
    MANAGEMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2023, 34 (06) : 1493 - 1515
  • [40] EVALUATION MATURITY INDEX AND RISK MANAGEMENT FOR IT GOVERNANCE USING FUZZY AHP AND FUZZY TOPSIS (CASE STUDY BANK XYZ)
    Yudatama, Uky
    Sarno, Riyanarto
    2015 INTERNATIONAL SEMINAR ON INTELLIGENT TECHNOLOGY AND ITS APPLICATIONS (ISITIA), 2015, : 323 - 327