Tight lower bounds for certain parameterized NP-hard problems

被引:118
|
作者
Chen, J
Chor, B
Fellows, M
Huang, XZ
Juedes, D
Kanj, IA
Xia, G
机构
[1] Depaul Univ, Sch CTI, Chicago, IL 60604 USA
[2] Ohio Univ, Sch EE&CS, Athens, OH 45701 USA
[3] Univ Newcastle, Sch Elect Engn & Comp Sci, Callaghan, NSW 2384, Australia
[4] Tel Aviv Univ, Sch Comp Sci, IL-69978 Tel Aviv, Israel
[5] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Comp Sci, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
基金
以色列科学基金会; 美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.ic.2005.05.001
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
Based on the framework of parameterized complexity theory,. we derive tight lower bounds on the computational complexity for a number of well-known NP-hard problems. We start by proving it general result, namely that the parameterized weighted satisfiability problem on depth-t circuits cannot be solved in time n(O(k))m(O(1)). where n is the circuit input length, in is the circuit size, and k is the parameter, unless the (t - 1)-st level W[t - 1] of the W-hierarchy collapses to FPT By refining this technique. we prove that a group of parameterized NP-hard problems, including weighted sat, hitting set. set cover. and feature set. cannot be solved in time n(O(k))m(O(1)), where n is the size of the universal set from which the k elements are to be selected and in is the instance size, unless the first level W[1] of the W-hierarchy collapses to FPT We also prove that another group of parameterized problems which includes WEIGHTED q-SAT (for any fixed q >= 2), CLIQUE, INDEPENDENT SET, and DOMINATING SET, cannot be solved in time n(O(k)) unless all search problems in the syntactic class SNP, introduced by Papadimitriou and Yarmakakis, are solvable in subexponential time. Note that all these parameterized problems have trivial algorithms of running time either n(k)m(O(1)) or O(n(k)). (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:216 / 231
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The Simplest Families of Polytopes Associated with NP-Hard Problems
    Maksimenko, A. N.
    DOKLADY MATHEMATICS, 2015, 91 (01) : 53 - 55
  • [32] Solving NP-hard combinatorial problems in the practical sense
    Ibaraki, T
    ALGORITHMS AND COMPUTATION, PROCEEDINGS, 1997, 1350 : 1 - 1
  • [33] Faster exact solutions for some NP-hard problems
    Drori, L
    Peleg, D
    THEORETICAL COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2002, 287 (02) : 473 - 499
  • [34] Probabilistic solutions to some NP-hard matrix problems
    Vidyasagar, M
    Blondel, VD
    AUTOMATICA, 2001, 37 (09) : 1397 - 1405
  • [35] MATRIX REPRESENTATION AND GRADIENT FLOWS FOR NP-HARD PROBLEMS
    WONG, WS
    JOURNAL OF OPTIMIZATION THEORY AND APPLICATIONS, 1995, 87 (01) : 197 - 220
  • [36] Stochastic Enumeration Method for Counting NP-Hard Problems
    Reuven Rubinstein
    Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, 2013, 15 : 249 - 291
  • [37] Trainyard is NP-Hard
    Almanza, Matteo
    Leucci, Stefano
    Panconesi, Alessandro
    THEORETICAL COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2018, 748 : 66 - 76
  • [38] Data-Driven Approximations to NP-Hard Problems
    Milan, Anton
    Rezatofighi, S. Hamid
    Garg, Ravi
    Dick, Anthony
    Reid, Ian
    THIRTY-FIRST AAAI CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2017, : 1453 - 1459
  • [39] Many bounded versions of undecidable problems are NP-hard
    Klingler, Andreas
    van der Eyden, Mirte
    Stengele, Sebastian
    Reinhart, Tobias
    De las Cuevas, Gemma
    SCIPOST PHYSICS, 2023, 14 (06):
  • [40] A rapid convergent genetic algorithm for NP-hard problems
    Oren, Liel
    Thirer, Nonel
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND MACHINE LEARNING FOR MULTI-DOMAIN OPERATIONS APPLICATIONS, 2019, 11006