Distributed coordination of project schedule changes using agent-based compensatory negotiation methodology

被引:6
|
作者
Kim, KS [1 ]
Paulson, BC
Levitt, RE
Fischer, MA
Petrie, CJ
机构
[1] Daewoo E&C Co Ltd, Daewoo Inst Construct Technol, Kyonggi Do 440210, South Korea
[2] Stanford Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[3] Stanford Univ, Stanford Networking Res Ctr, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[4] Daewoo E&C Co Ltd, Daewoo Inst Construct Technol, Kyonggi Do 440210, South Korea
[5] Stanford Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[6] Stanford Univ, Stanford Networking Res Ctr, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
来源
AI EDAM-ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE FOR ENGINEERING DESIGN ANALYSIS AND MANUFACTURING | 2003年 / 17卷 / 02期
关键词
compensatory negotiation; distributed coordination; project scheduling; software agent;
D O I
10.1017/S0890060403172022
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
In the construction industry, projects are becoming increasingly large and complex, necessitating multiple subcontractors. Traditional centralized coordination techniques used by general contractors become insufficient as subcontractors perforin most work and provide their own resources. When subcontractors cannot provide enough resources, they hinder their own performance, that of other subcontractors, and ultimately the entire project. Thus, projects need a new distributed coordination approach wherein all of the concerned subcontractors can respond to changes and reschedule a project dynamically. This paper presents a new distributed coordination framework for project schedule changes (DCPSC) that is based on an agent-based negotiation approach wherein software agents evaluate the impact of changes, simulate decisions, and give advice on behalf of the human subcontractors. A case example demonstrates the significance of the DCPSC. It compares two centralized coordination methodologies used in current practice to the DCPSC framework. We demonstrate that our DCPSC framework always finds a solution that is better than or equal to any of two centralized coordination methodologies.
引用
收藏
页码:115 / 131
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Agent-based project scheduling
    Knotts, Gary, 2000, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands (32):
  • [42] Agent-based distributed simulation
    Wu, Jian
    Schulz, Noel N.
    Gao, Wenzhong
    2006 POWER ENGINEERING SOCIETY GENERAL MEETING, VOLS 1-9, 2006, : 394 - +
  • [43] Agent-based project scheduling
    Knotts, G
    Dror, M
    Hartman, BC
    IIE TRANSACTIONS, 2000, 32 (05) : 387 - 401
  • [44] Scalable agent-based simulation - Distributed simulation of agent-based models
    Pawlaszczyk D.
    KI - Künstliche Intelligenz, 2010, 24 (2) : 161 - 163
  • [45] Adding a declarative representation of negotiation mechanisms to an agent-based negotiation service
    Dobriceanu, Adriana
    Biscu, Laurentiu
    Badica, Costin
    PROCEEDING OF THE 2007 IEEE/WIC/ACM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WEB INTELLIGENCE AND INTELLIGENT AGENT TECHNOLOGY, WORKSHOPS, 2007, : 471 - 474
  • [46] Mobile agent-based negotiated schedule method
    Wu Xin
    Wang Yan-hong
    Proceedings of the 2007 Chinese Control and Decision Conference, 2007, : 823 - 826
  • [47] Agent-Based Distributed Planning and Coordination for Resilient Airport Surface Movement Operations
    Fines, Konstantine
    Sharpanskykh, Alexei
    Vert, Matthieu
    AEROSPACE, 2020, 7 (04)
  • [48] Agent-based fuzzy constraint-directed negotiation mechanism for distributed job shop scheduling
    Hsu, Chia-Yu
    Kao, Bo-Ruei
    Van Lam Ho
    Lai, K. Robert
    ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2016, 53 : 140 - 154
  • [49] An approach of agent-based distributed simulation for supply chains: Negotiation protocols between collaborative agents
    El Habib, Nfaoui
    El Beqqali, Omar
    Ouzrout, Yacine
    Bouras, Abdelaziz
    MODELLING AND SIMULATION 2006, 2006, : 290 - +
  • [50] An agent-based approach to multisensor coordination
    Hodge, L
    Kamel, M
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS PART A-SYSTEMS AND HUMANS, 2003, 33 (05): : 648 - 662