A Cost-Sharing Model of Agricultural Disaster Insurance

被引:0
|
作者
Gang Jiatai [1 ]
Li Shujuan [1 ]
Gong Haoran [1 ]
Guo Yuanyuan [1 ]
Fan Guilan [1 ]
Wang Sen [1 ]
机构
[1] Dalian Univ, Coll Informat Engn, Dalian, Peoples R China
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 6TH (2014) INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FINANCIAL RISK AND CORPORATE FINANCE MANAGEMENT, VOLS. I AND II | 2014年
关键词
Agricultural disaster insurance; One-Sample T Test; AHP; satisfaction degree; Monte Carlo;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
A risk assessment model on agricultural natural disaster insurance is established, taking wheats for example. Firstly, estimate the disaster probability of wheats which suffered from gale, hail, waterlog and frost in each growing season. Secondly, calculate compensation expectations of wheats damaged by different natural disasters by insurance companies under the existing insurance scheme. Thirdly, it is obviously that insurance companies actually run in a loss comparing with the companies' net income in the existing insurance policy. AHP is used to establish a Cost-Sharing Model based on the government, insurance companies and farmers Satisfaction Degree Equation. By solving the equations of satisfaction, getting the tripartite risk ratio under the greatest satisfaction degree are 0.44, 0.19 and 0.37, respectively. And a new insurance scheme is developed. The results indicate that the companies can operate normally when the loss probability is 0.147 under the new scheme, it is to see the new insurance scheme is effective and feasible.
引用
收藏
页码:8 / 13
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Cost-sharing of Agricultural Technology Transfer in Nigeria: Perceptions of Farmers and Extension Professionals
    Ozor, N.
    Agwu, A. E.
    Chukwuone, N. A.
    Madukwe, M. C.
    Garforth, C. J.
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL EDUCATION & EXTENSION, 2007, 13 (01): : 23 - 37
  • [42] Modeling voluntary participation in a cost-sharing agricultural water quality management program
    Sun, H
    Houston, JE
    Thomas, DL
    ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2000, 94 (1-4) : 125 - 138
  • [43] DESCRIPTIVE MODEL FOR ANALYZING PROPOSED COST-SHARING RATE CHANGES
    SELLERS, J
    NORTH, RM
    WATER RESOURCES BULLETIN, 1979, 15 (06): : 1677 - 1690
  • [44] Do individuals respond to cost-sharing subsidies in their selections of marketplace health insurance plans?
    DeLeire, Thomas
    Chappel, Andre
    Finegold, Kenneth
    Gee, Emily
    JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2017, 56 : 71 - 86
  • [45] SOME INTERIM RESULTS FROM A CONTROLLED TRIAL OF COST-SHARING IN HEALTH-INSURANCE
    NEWHOUSE, JP
    MANNING, WG
    MORRIS, CN
    ORR, LL
    DUAN, N
    KEELER, EB
    LEIBOWITZ, A
    MARQUIS, KH
    MARQUIS, MS
    PHELPS, CE
    BROOK, RH
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1981, 305 (25): : 1501 - 1507
  • [46] Incentivizing efficient utilization without reducing access: The case against cost-sharing in insurance
    Fels, Markus
    HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2020, 29 (07) : 827 - 840
  • [47] Impact of a cost-sharing drug insurance plan on drug utilization among older people
    Blais, L
    Boucher, JM
    Couture, J
    Rahme, E
    LeLorier, J
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2001, 49 (04) : 410 - 414
  • [48] HOW COST-SHARING REDUCED MEDICAL SPENDING OF PARTICIPANTS IN THE HEALTH-INSURANCE EXPERIMENT
    KEELER, EB
    ROLPH, JE
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1983, 249 (16): : 2220 - 2222
  • [50] Health status and heterogeneity of cost-sharing responsiveness: how do sick people respond to cost-sharing?
    Remler, DK
    Atherly, AJ
    HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2003, 12 (04) : 269 - 280