The Application of H-Loop in Arthroscopic Knotless Double-Row Rotator Cuff Repairs

被引:2
|
作者
Guo, Jiang [1 ,2 ]
Hou, Jingyi [1 ]
Yu, Menglei [1 ]
Alike, Yamuhanmode [1 ]
Long, Yi [1 ]
Tang, Yiyong [1 ]
Li, Qingyue [1 ]
Li, Fangqi [1 ]
Zhang, Yuhao [1 ]
Ali, MaslahIdiris [1 ]
Zheng, Zhenze [1 ]
Meng, Ke [1 ]
Wang, Peng [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Rui [1 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Affiliated Hosp 2, Dept Orthoped, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Affiliated Hosp 8, Dept Orthoped, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
关键词
Double row; H-loop; Knotless; Rotator cuff tear; Suture; SUTURE BRIDGE; SINGLE-ROW; FAILURE;
D O I
10.1111/os.13107
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective To determine the functional outcomes after a novel method of H-loop knotless double-row technique in patients with rotator cuff tears. Method From June 2020 to September 2020, a total of six patients (five women, one man) with arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using the H-loop knotless double-row technique were enrolled in our study. The average age is 54 years (range: 50-61 years). The preoperative and final follow-up clinical outcome were evaluated using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, visual analog scale (VAS), University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) score, and Constant-Murley score. The active shoulder range of motion (ROM) was also collected preoperatively and postoperatively at the final follow-up (forward flexion and abduction). Accordingly, intraoperative and postoperative complications were observed as well. Result There were six patients that underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using the H-loop knotless double-row technique. The average follow-up period was 7.52 +/- 0.70 months. The VAS, UCLA, ASES, and Constant-Murley scores improved from 5 +/- 2.45, 15.67 +/- 3.44, 47.67 +/- 17.41 and 49.17 +/- 8.98 preoperatively, to 0.83 +/- 0.75, 36.27 +/- 3.83, 91.67 +/- 10.76 and 85.83 +/- 4.31 at the final follow-up, with statistical significances of P = 0.009, P < 0.001, P = 0.006, and P = 0.001, respectively. Meanwhile, the active shoulder ROM (forward flexion and abduction) improved from 135.00 +/- 46.80 and 125 +/- 56.48 preoperatively, to 173.67 +/- 4.13 and 172 +/- 3.27 at final follow-up, respectively (P = 0.082, P = 0.088). During the follow-up, there were no postoperative complications such as wound-site infection, nerve or vessel damage, subcutaneous hematoma, and suture anchor problems. Conclusion With the benefit of reducing the possibility of strangulation and blood supply affection for the rotator cuff, The H-loop knotless double row technique may be an alternative method to significantly improve subjective functional outcomes and increase the healing rate of medium-sized rotator cuff tears with degeneration issues and poor tissue quality.
引用
收藏
页码:2170 / 2176
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A biomechanical comparison of single and double-row fixation in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair
    Smith, Christopher D.
    Alexander, Susan
    Hill, Adam M.
    Huijsmans, Pol E.
    Bull, Anthony M. J.
    Amis, Andrew A.
    De Beer, Joe F.
    Wallace, Andrew L.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2006, 88A (11): : 2425 - 2431
  • [32] Arthroscopic single-row versus double-row suture anchor rotator cuff repair
    Mazzocca, AD
    Millett, PJ
    Guanche, CA
    Santangelo, SA
    Arciero, RA
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2005, 33 (12): : 1861 - 1868
  • [33] Outcomes of Single-Row and Double-Row Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Systematic Review
    Saridakis, Paul
    Jones, Grant
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2010, 92A (03): : 732 - 742
  • [34] The low-profile Roman bridge technique for knotless double-row repair of the rotator cuff
    Umile Giuseppe Longo
    Francesco Franceschi
    Filippo Spiezia
    Andrea Marinozzi
    Nicola Maffulli
    Vincenzo Denaro
    Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2011, 131 : 357 - 361
  • [35] Evaluation of residual rotator cuff defects after in vivo single- versus double-row rotator cuff repairs
    Brady, Paul C.
    Arrigoni, Paolo
    Burkhart, Stephen S.
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2006, 22 (10): : 1070 - 1075
  • [36] What is wrong in comparison of single- and double-row repairs in rotator cuff tears?
    Alper Deveci
    European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, 2019, 29 : 1589 - 1590
  • [37] The low-profile Roman bridge technique for knotless double-row repair of the rotator cuff
    Longo, Umile Giuseppe
    Franceschi, Francesco
    Spiezia, Filippo
    Marinozzi, Andrea
    Maffulli, Nicola
    Denaro, Vincenzo
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2011, 131 (03) : 357 - 361
  • [38] What is wrong in comparison of single- and double-row repairs in rotator cuff tears?
    Deveci, Alper
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND TRAUMATOLOGY, 2019, 29 (07): : 1589 - 1590
  • [39] Double-row Rotator Cuff Repair Strategies
    Millett, Peter J.
    Gaskill, Trevor R.
    Denard, Patrick J.
    Burkhart, Stephen S.
    TECHNIQUES IN SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2012, 13 (02): : 55 - 59
  • [40] Comparison of the clinical outcomes of single-with double-row repairs in rotator cuff tears
    Park, Jin-Young
    Lhee, Sang-Hoon
    Choi, Jin-Hyung
    Park, Hong-Keun
    Yu, Je-Wook
    Seo, Joong-Bae
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2008, 36 (07): : 1310 - 1316