Oncological safety and patient satisfaction with skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction

被引:56
|
作者
Patani, N. [1 ,2 ]
Devalia, H. [1 ,3 ]
Anderson, A. [1 ]
Mokbel, K. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Princess Grace Hosp, London Breast Inst, London W1U 5NY, England
[2] UCL, Dept Surg, London, England
[3] St Georges Univ London, London, England
来源
SURGICAL ONCOLOGY-OXFORD | 2008年 / 17卷 / 02期
关键词
breast cancer; ductal carcinoma in situ; immediate breast reconstruction; morbidity; outcome; recurrence; satisfaction; skin-sparing mastectomy;
D O I
10.1016/j.suronc.2007.11.004
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Introduction: The management of early breast cancer with skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) and immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) is not based on evidence from randomised controlled trials. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the oncological safety, postoperative morbidity and patients' satisfaction with SSM and IBR using the latissimus dorsi (LD) myocutaneous flap and/or breast prosthesis. Methods: Eighty-three consecutive women underwent 93 SSMs with IBR (10 bilateral), using the LD flap plus implant (n = 55) or implant alone (n = 38), indications included early breast cancer and prophylaxis due to BRCA-1 gene mutation. Nipple reconstruction was performed in 38 patients, using the trefoil local flap technique, nipple sharing or Monocryl mesh. Twenty-three underwent contra-lateral surgery in order to optimise symmetry, including 15 augmentations and eight mastopexy/reduction mammoplasties. Patient satisfaction with the outcome of surgery was assessed on a linear visual analogue scale ranging from 0 (not satisfied) to 10 (most satisfied). Results: There was no local recurrence (LR) after a median follow-up of 34 months (range = 3-79 months). Overall survival was 98.8%, three patients developed distant disease and one patient died of metastatic breast cancer. No case of partial or total LD flap loss was observed. Morbidities included infection, requiring implant removal in two patients and one patient developed marginal ischaemia of the skin envelope. Significant capsule formation, requiring capsulotomy, was observed in 87% of patients who had either PMR or prior RT compared with 13% for those who did not have RT. Sixty-one (73.5%) of 83 patients completed the questionnaire with a median and mean satisfaction scores of 10.0 and 9.3, respectively (range = 6-10). Conclusion: SSM with IBR is associated with low morbidity, high levels of patient satisfaction and is oncologically adequate for T-is, T1 and T2 tumours without extensive skin involvement. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:97 / 105
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Impact of skin-sparing mastectomy with immediate reconstruction and breast-sparing reconstruction with miniflaps on the outcomes of oncoplastic breast surgery
    Gendy, RK
    Able, JA
    Rainsbury, RM
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2003, 90 (04) : 433 - 439
  • [32] Promising Oncological and Clinical Outcome in Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Nipple- or Skin-Sparing Mastectomy With Immediate Reconstruction
    Ozkurt, Enver
    Tukenmez, Mustafa
    Ozden, Burcu C.
    Oner, Gizem
    Guven, Erdem
    Muslumanoglu, Mahmut
    Igci, Abdullah
    Ozmen, Vahit
    Kucucuk, Seden
    Cabioglu, Neslihan
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 22 : 85 - 85
  • [33] Oncologic safety of skin-sparing mastectomy followed by immediate breast reconstruction: rate and localization of recurrences, and impact of reconstruction techniques
    Romics Laszlo
    Stallard, Sheila
    Weiler-Mithoff, Eva
    ORVOSI HETILAP, 2013, 154 (05) : 163 - 171
  • [34] Clinical comparison of four types of skin incisions for skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction
    Kinoshita, Satoki
    Kyoda, Shigeya
    Hirano, Akio
    Akiba, Tadashi
    Nojima, Kimihiro
    Uchida, Ken
    Takeyama, Hiroshi
    Morikawa, Toshiaki
    SURGERY TODAY, 2014, 44 (08) : 1470 - 1475
  • [35] Refinements of the LeJour vertical mammaplasty skin pattern for skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction
    Hunter, J. E.
    Malata, C. M.
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2007, 60 (05): : 471 - 481
  • [36] Clinical comparison of four types of skin incisions for skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction
    Satoki Kinoshita
    Shigeya Kyoda
    Akio Hirano
    Tadashi Akiba
    Kimihiro Nojima
    Ken Uchida
    Hiroshi Takeyama
    Toshiaki Morikawa
    Surgery Today, 2014, 44 : 1470 - 1475
  • [37] Oncologic Safety of Nipple Skin-Sparing or Total Skin-Sparing Mastectomies With Immediate Reconstruction
    Boneti, Cristiano
    Yuen, James
    Santiago, Carlos
    Diaz, Zuleika
    Robertson, Yara
    Korourian, Soheila
    Westbrook, Kent C.
    Henry-Tillman, Ronda S.
    Klimberg, V. Suzanne
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2011, 212 (04) : 686 - 693
  • [38] Skin-sparing mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction in women with early operable breast cancer.
    Baildam, AD
    Hayes, L
    Poulter, J
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2001, 69 (03) : 231 - 231
  • [39] Patterns of local breast cancer recurrence after skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction
    Vaughan, Aislinn
    Dietz, Jill R.
    Aft, Rebecca
    Gillanders, William E.
    Eberlein, Timothy J.
    Freer, Phoebe
    Margenthaler, Julie A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2007, 194 (04): : 438 - 443
  • [40] Nipple- or skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction by the "moving window" operation
    Ohno, Yukako
    Noguchi, Masakuni
    Yokoi-Noguchi, Miki
    Nakano, Yasuharu
    Shimada, Ken-ichi
    Yamamoto, Yasunori
    Kawakami, Shigehiko
    BREAST CANCER, 2013, 20 (01) : 54 - 61