A multi-criteria parametric evaluation of the refuelling strategies for scooters

被引:2
|
作者
Fu, Tseng-Ti [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Taiwan Univ, Taipei, Taiwan
关键词
design evaluation; cost-benefit analysis; parametric model;
D O I
10.1080/09544820701327830
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Being friendly to the environments, electric scooters are promoted in particular by many countries as part of their environmental protection policy. However, like all commercial products, the electric scooter is economically driven. Even though the government can set favoured conditions at the beginning of its development, the product still has to survive by its own profit. A framework of whole-life cost/benefit parametric evaluation from the user's point of view is proposed here for the selection of the best refuelling strategy for electric scooters. Instead of traditional survey weightings, this approach employs physical links between design parameters and system performance costs. According to the evaluation, the most favourite strategy is the mode of exchanging batteries at gas stations. However, all modes of electric scooters have deficits relative to the gasoline system. The inferiority is mainly attributable to the limitation of battery performance, and expected benefits of environmental protection are not realized at this point in time. Sensitivity analyses are also conducted to demonstrate dynamic effects of parameters, such as the product lifetime, fuel price and user time value, on the final decision. This methodology is flexible in response to condition changes by its parametric nature. It is able to provide more insights and dynamic evaluation results for scooter users, product engineers or policy-makers alike to make individual decisions based on their own unique conditions.
引用
收藏
页码:227 / 247
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Multi-criteria evaluation for CHP system options
    Pilavachi, P. A.
    Roumpeas, C. P.
    Minett, S.
    Afgan, N. H.
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2006, 47 (20) : 3519 - 3529
  • [32] Evaluation of ranking accuracy in multi-criteria decisions
    Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras
    Zakarevicius, Algimantas
    Antucheviciene, Jurgita
    INFORMATICA, 2006, 17 (04) : 601 - 618
  • [33] Measuring Competitiveness Using Multi-criteria Evaluation
    Juraj, Sebo
    Miriam, Sebova
    JOURNAL OF COMPETITIVENESS, 2010, (01) : 33 - 40
  • [34] Multi-criteria evaluation for facility layout problems
    Liu, Fei
    Dong, Ming
    Hou, Wen-Hao
    Zhai, Yu
    Shanghai Jiaotong Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2007, 41 (04): : 664 - 668
  • [35] Multi-criteria evaluation of hydrogen system options
    Afgan, Naim H.
    Veziroglu, Ayfer
    Carvalho, Maria G.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2007, 32 (15) : 3183 - 3193
  • [36] Multi-criteria evaluation of information retrieval tools
    Kumar, Nishant
    Vanthienen, Jan
    De Beer, Jan
    Moens, Marie-Francine
    ICEIS 2006: Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems: ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 2006, : 150 - 155
  • [37] Multi-criteria evaluation of natural gas resources
    Afgan, Nalm H.
    Pilavachi, Petros A.
    Carvalho, Maria G.
    ENERGY POLICY, 2007, 35 (01) : 704 - 713
  • [38] Evaluation of decision trees: a multi-criteria approach
    Osei-Bryson, KM
    COMPUTERS & OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2004, 31 (11) : 1933 - 1945
  • [39] Multi-criteria evaluation of public transport interchanges
    Bryniarska, Zofia
    Zakowska, Lidia
    3RD CONFERENCE ON SUSTAINABLE URBAN MOBILITY (3RD CSUM 2016), 2017, 24 : 25 - 32
  • [40] Multi-Source Information Fusion with Multi-Criteria Evaluation
    Zhu, Lianli
    Zuo, Kezhu
    Zhu, Min
    Li, Xinde
    2023 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DEVELOPMENT AND LEARNING, ICDL, 2023, : 530 - 535