Large cross-sectional area of the umbilical cord as a predictor of fetal macrosomia

被引:39
|
作者
Cromi, A. [1 ]
Ghezzi, F. [1 ]
Di Naro, E. [2 ]
Siesto, G. [1 ]
Bergamini, V. [3 ]
Raio, L. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Insubria, Del Ponte Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Varese, Italy
[2] Univ Bari, Bari, Italy
[3] Univ Verona, I-37100 Verona, Italy
[4] Univ Bern Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland
关键词
diabetes; estimated fetal weight; macrosomia; ultrasound; umbilical cord; Wharton's jelly;
D O I
10.1002/uog.5183
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Objective To determine whether a large cross-sectional area of the umbilical cord is a predictor of fetal macrosomia. Methods Consecutive Patients of > 34 weeks' gestation, who presented for sonographic examination and who delivered within 4 weeks of the examination, were included in the study. The sonographic cross-sectional areas of the umbilical cord, the umbilical vessels and the Wharton's jelly were measured in a free loop of the umbilical cord. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine significant predictors of macrosomia (actual birth weight > 4000 g and > 4500 g). Fetal biometric parameters (biparietal diameter, abdominal circumference and femur length), sonographic estimated fetal weight and umbilical cord area > 95(th) centile for gestational age were used as covariates. Results During the study period, 1026 patients were enrolled. Fifty-three (5.2%) newborns had a birth weight >4000g, and 22 (2.1%) weighed >4500g. The proportion of cases with a large umbilical cord was significantly higher in the group of macrosomic compared with non-macrosomic infants (54.7% vs. 8.7%, P < 0.0001). Multiple regression models demonstrated an independent contribution of the large cord in the prediction of birth weight > 4000 g and > 4500 g (odds ratio (9S% CI), 20.6 (9.2-45.9) and 4.2 (1.2-17.7), respectively). The sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values of a sonographic large umbilical cord were 54.7%, 91.3%, 25.4%, and 97.4%, respectively. The combination of abdominal circumference >95(th) centile and large cord predicted 100% of macrosomic infants. The proportion of umbilical cords with a Wharton's jelly area > 95(th) centile for gestation was significantly higher in macrosomic fetuses of diabetic compared with non-diabetic mothers. Conclusions Sonographic assessment of umbilical cord area may improve the prediction of fetal macrosomia. Copyright (c) 2007 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:861 / 866
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Lead levels in umbilical cord blood in Belgium: A cross-sectional study in five maternity units
    Zhang, Wei-Hong
    Dewolf, Marie-Christine
    Hammadi, Samia
    Fris, Wendy
    Noel, Etienne
    Lorenzo, Rosalie
    Alexander, Sophie
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYGIENE AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH, 2012, 215 (02) : 202 - 205
  • [22] Maternal Obesity Alters Placental and Umbilical Cord Plasma Oxidative Stress, a Cross-Sectional Study
    Jantape, Thanyawan
    Kongwattanakul, Kiattisak
    Arribas, Silvia M.
    Rodriguez-Rodriguez, Pilar
    Iampanichakul, Metee
    Settheetham-Ishida, Wannapa
    Phuthong, Sophida
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES, 2024, 25 (19)
  • [23] Umbilical Cord Biometry and Fetal Abdominal Skinfold Assessment as Potential Biomarkers for Fetal Macrosomia in a Gestational Diabetes Romanian Cohort
    Florian, Andreea Roxana
    Cruciat, Gheorghe
    Nemeti, Georgiana
    Staicu, Adelina
    Suciu, Cristina
    Sulaiman, Mariam Chaikh
    Goidescu, Iulian
    Muresan, Daniel
    Stamatian, Florin
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2022, 58 (09):
  • [24] Large-for-gestational-age or macrosomia as a classifier for risk of adverse perinatal outcome: a retrospective cross-sectional study
    Modzelewski, Jan
    Pokropek, Artur
    Jakubiak-Proc, Monika
    Muzyka-Placzynska, Katarzyna
    Filipecka-Tyczka, Dagmara
    Kajdy, Anna
    Rabijewski, Michal
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2022, 35 (25): : 5564 - 5571
  • [25] Upper cervical spinal cord cross-sectional area in relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis: Application of a new technique for measuring cross-sectional area on magnetic resonance images
    Mann, Ranbir S.
    Constantinescu, Cris S.
    Tench, Christopher R.
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2007, 26 (01) : 61 - 65
  • [26] Cross sectional area of the fetal corpus callosum
    Birnholz, JC
    RADIOLOGY, 2002, 225 : 490 - 490
  • [27] Inter- and intra-observer variability in Sonographic measurements of the cross-sectional diameters and area of the umbilical cord and its vessels during pregnancy
    Barbieri C.
    Cecatti J.G.
    Souza C.E.
    Marussi E.F.
    Costa J.V.
    Reproductive Health, 5 (1)
  • [28] CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA OF FLEXIBLE TUBES
    KRESCH, E
    BULLETIN OF MATHEMATICAL BIOLOGY, 1979, 41 (01) : 39 - 52
  • [29] DETERMINANTS OF GLOMERULAR CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA
    NEWBOLD, KM
    HOWIE, AJ
    JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY, 1990, 162 (04): : 329 - 332
  • [30] Cross-sectional area of the mandible - Discussion
    Dodson, TB
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1997, 55 (07) : 693 - 693