Extra-short implants in the prosthetic rehabilitation of the posterior maxilla

被引:10
|
作者
Gurlek, O. [1 ]
Kaval, M. E. [2 ]
Buduneli, N. [1 ]
Nizam, N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ege Univ, Sch Dent, Dept Periodontol, TR-35100 Izmir, Turkey
[2] Ege Univ, Sch Dent, Dept Endodontol, Izmir, Turkey
关键词
Dental implants; maxilla; osseointegration; radiography; INCORPORATED TITANIUM SURFACE; MARGINAL BONE LOSS; 5 MM IMPLANTS; LONGER IMPLANTS; SINUS FLOOR; STANDARD IMPLANTS; COMPLICATIONS; AUGMENTATION; SURVIVAL; HEIGHT;
D O I
10.1111/adj.12711
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Aim To compare clinical outcomes of 'extra-short' and regular bone level implants in the posterior maxilla for 12 months after loading. Materials and Methods Twenty-three systemically healthy, non-smoking patients received 30 extra-short, 24 regular bone level implants. Acrylic stents were fabricated for each patient for correct implant positioning. Implant lengths were 4-6 mm in the test, 8/10 mm in the control group. Radiographic evaluation was performed at baseline, 6, and 12 months after loading. Crestal bone level (CBL), CBL change (CBLC), true crown length (TCL), implant/crown ratio (ICR) and residual bone height (RBH) below maxillary sinus floor were calculated digitally. Data were tested statistically. Results Residual bone height was significantly lower, and TCL and ICR were higher in the test than the control group (P < 0.0001). CBL measurements at baseline were 0.19 +/- 0.18 mm and 0.31 +/- 0.37 mm and at 12 months, 0.24 +/- 0.24 mm and 0.41 +/- 0.31 mm, respectively in the test and control groups. CBL values at 12 months were significantly lower in the test than the control group (P < 0.05). CBLCs were similar at all times (P > 0.05). No correlation was found between the CBLC and implant/prosthetic parameters. Conclusion Extra-short and regular implants might provide similar clinical outcomes in prosthetic rehabilitation of atrophic maxilla, during 12 months follow-up.
引用
收藏
页码:353 / 358
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Rehabilitation of the Atrophic Posterior Maxilla Using Splinted Short Implants or Sinus Augmentation with Standard-Length Implants: A Retrospective Cohort Study
    Pieri, Francesco
    Caselli, Ernesto
    Forlivesi, Caterina
    Corinaldesi, Giuseppe
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2016, 31 (05) : 1179 - 1188
  • [22] Fiber-reinforced composite full-arch prosthetic reconstructions supported by three standard, short or extra-short implants: a two-center retrospective study
    Cheng, Yu-Chi
    Perpetuini, Paolo
    Murcko, Laura
    Hirayama, Muneki
    Morgan, Katherine
    Marincola, Mauro
    Bonfante, Estevam A.
    Bergamo, Edmara T. P.
    Ewers, Rolf
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2023, 27 (08) : 4191 - 4203
  • [23] Fiber-reinforced composite full-arch prosthetic reconstructions supported by three standard, short or extra-short implants: a two-center retrospective study
    Yu-Chi Cheng
    Paolo Perpetuini
    Laura Murcko
    Muneki Hirayama
    Katherine Morgan
    Mauro Marincola
    Estevam A. Bonfante
    Edmara T. P. Bergamo
    Rolf Ewers
    Clinical Oral Investigations, 2023, 27 : 4191 - 4203
  • [24] Prosthetic rehabilitation of the atrophic maxilla using pre-implant surgery and endosseous implants
    Chan, MFWY
    Howell, RA
    Cawood, JI
    BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL, 1996, 181 (02) : 51 - 58
  • [25] GUIDELINES FOR ACHIEVING THE BEST IMPLANTS SURVIVAL RATES IN THE REHABILITATION OF THE ATROPHIC POSTERIOR MAXILLA
    De Santis, D.
    Sinigaglia, S.
    Pancera, P.
    Faccioni, P.
    Portelli, M.
    Tacchino, U.
    Manuelli, M.
    Luciano, U.
    Setti, A. P.
    Bursi, P.
    Nocini, R.
    Nocini, P. F.
    Bertossi, D.
    JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL REGULATORS AND HOMEOSTATIC AGENTS, 2019, 33 (01): : 43 - 47
  • [26] Stress distribution with extra-short implants in an angled frictional system: A finite element analysis study
    Rendohl, Edelcio de Souza
    Brandt, William Cunha
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2020, 124 (06): : 728.e1 - 728.e9
  • [27] Long-Term Effectiveness of Extra-Short (≤ 6 mm) Dental Implants: A Systematic Review
    Ravida, Andrea
    Barootchi, Shayan
    Askar, Houssam
    del Amo, Fernando Suarez-Lopez
    Tavelli, Lorenzo
    Wang, Hom-Lay
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2019, 34 (01) : 68 - +
  • [28] Failures in Single Extra-Short Implants (≤ 6 mm): A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Badaro, Mauricio Malheiros
    Marin, Danny Omar Mendoza
    Pauletto, Patricia
    Goncalves, Thais Marques Simek Vega
    Porporatti, Andre Luis
    Canto, Graziela De Luca
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2021, 36 (04) : 669 - +
  • [29] Extra short dental implants supporting an overdenture in the edentulous maxilla: a proof of concept
    Van Assche, N.
    Michels, S.
    Quirynen, M.
    Naert, I.
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2012, 23 (05) : 567 - 576
  • [30] Treatment concepts for the posterior maxilla and mandible: short implants versus long implants in augmented bone
    Thoma, Daniel Stefan
    Cha, Jae-Kook
    Jung, Ui-Won
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTAL AND IMPLANT SCIENCE, 2017, 47 (01): : 2 - 12