Diagnosis of gastric intestinal metaplasia with confocal laser endomicroscopy in vivo: a prospective study

被引:91
|
作者
Guo, Y. -T. [1 ,2 ]
Li, Y. -Q. [1 ]
Yu, T. [1 ]
Zhang, T. -G. [3 ]
Zhang, J. -N. [1 ]
Liu, H. [1 ]
Liu, F. -G. [1 ]
Xie, X. -J. [1 ]
Zhu, Q. [1 ]
Zhao, Y. -A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Shandong Univ, Qilu Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol, Jinan 250012, Peoples R China
[2] Shandong Tradit Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 2, Dept Gastroenterol, Jinan, Peoples R China
[3] Shandong Univ, Qilu Hosp, Dept Pathol, Jinan 250012, Peoples R China
关键词
D O I
10.1055/s-2007-995633
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and study aims: Gastric intestinal metaplasia (GIM) is a risk factor for development of intestinal-type gastric cancer. We aimed to assess the usefulness of confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE) in diagnosing GIM. Patients and methods: 28 patients with known GIM underwent CLE, and CLE criteria for diagnosis of GIM were developed. In addition, 53 consecutive patients with known or suspected GIM were prospectively evaluated. Results: GIM was identified if any of the following three features were present in an image field: goblet cells, columnar absorptive cells and brush border, and villiform foveolar epithelium. GIM was then classified as complete or incomplete according to the shape of the goblet cells, the presence of absorptive cells or brush border, and the architecture of vessels and crypts. In a prospective study, a total of 13 670 CLE images were obtained. Among 267 sites from 53 patients, 160 from 36 patients were diagnosed histopathologically as GIM. The sensitivities of conventional endoscopy and CLE for GIM were 36.88% vs. 98.13%, and the specificities were 91.59% vs. 95.33%, respectively. The kappa value for the correlation with histological findings was 0.25 for conventional endoscopy vs. 0.94 for CLE. The sensitivity and specificity of CLE were 68.03% and 89.66%, respectively, for the diagnosis of complete GIM, and 68.42% and 83.41%, respectively, for incomplete GIM; the kappa value for the correspondence between CLE and histological findings was 0.67. Conclusion: CLE is a useful and potentially important method for the diagnosis and classification of GIM in vivo.
引用
收藏
页码:547 / 553
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The Learning Curve of Gastric Intestinal Metaplasia Interpretation on the Images Obtained by Probe-Based Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy (pCLE)
    Pittayanon, Rapat
    Rerknimitr, Rungsun
    Wisedopas, Naruemon
    Khemnark, Suparat
    Thanapirom, Kessarin
    Thienchanachaiya, Pornphan
    Norrasetwanich, Nuttaporn
    Charoensuk, Kriangsak
    Ridtitid, Wiriyaporn
    Treeprasertsuk, Sombat
    Kongkam, Pradermchai
    Kullavanijaya, Pinit
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2012, 75 (04) : 227 - 228
  • [32] Confocal laser endomicroscopy for diagnosis
    Guy, Sara
    EXPERT REVIEW OF MEDICAL DEVICES, 2008, 5 (04) : 415 - 415
  • [33] Confocal laser endomicroscopy in the "in vivo" histological diagnosis of the gastrointestinal tract
    De Palma, Giovanni D.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2009, 15 (46) : 5770 - 5775
  • [34] Confocal laser endomicroscopy in the “in vivo” histological diagnosis of the gastrointestinal tract
    Giovanni D De Palma
    World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2009, 15 (46) : 5770 - 5775
  • [35] Real-time diagnosis of Barrett’s esophagus: a prospective, multicenter study comparing confocal laser endomicroscopy with conventional histology for the identification of intestinal metaplasia in new users
    Cory Richardson
    Paul Colavita
    Christy Dunst
    John Bagnato
    Peter Billing
    Kurt Birkenhagen
    Francis Buckley
    William Buitrago
    Joseph Burnette
    Phil Leggett
    Howard McCollister
    Kurt Stewart
    Thomas Wang
    Alvin Zfass
    Paul Severson
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2019, 33 : 1585 - 1591
  • [36] Real-time diagnosis of Barrett's esophagus: a prospective, multicenter study comparing confocal laser endomicroscopy with conventional histology for the identification of intestinal metaplasia in new users
    Richardson, Cory
    Colavita, Paul
    Dunst, Christy
    Bagnato, John
    Billing, Peter
    Birkenhagen, Kurt
    Buckley, Francis
    Buitrago, William
    Burnette, Joseph
    Leggett, Phil
    McCollister, Howard
    Stewart, Kurt
    Wang, Thomas
    Zfass, Alvin
    Severson, Paul
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2019, 33 (05): : 1585 - 1591
  • [37] Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy for In Vivo Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile Associated Colitis - A Pilot Study
    Neumann, Helmut
    Guenther, Claudia
    Vieth, Michael
    Grauer, Martin
    Wittkopf, Nadine
    Mudter, Jonas
    Becker, Christoph
    Schoerner, Christoph
    Atreya, Raja
    Neurath, Markus F.
    PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (03):
  • [38] Comparison of probe-based confocal endomicroscopy with virtual chromoendoscopy and white-light endoscopy for diagnosis of gastric intestinal metaplasia
    Lee Guan Lim
    Khay Guan Yeoh
    Supriya Srivastava
    Yiong Huak Chan
    Ming Teh
    Khek Yu Ho
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2013, 27 : 4649 - 4655
  • [39] Confocal laser endomicroscopy for gastric neoplasm
    Dhali, Arkadeep
    Maity, Rick
    Rathna, Roger B.
    Biswas, Jyotirmoy
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2024, 16 (09):
  • [40] Comparison of probe-based confocal endomicroscopy with virtual chromoendoscopy and white-light endoscopy for diagnosis of gastric intestinal metaplasia
    Lim, Lee Guan
    Yeoh, Khay Guan
    Srivastava, Supriya
    Chan, Yiong Huak
    Teh, Ming
    Ho, Khek Yu
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2013, 27 (12): : 4649 - 4655