Perspectives of residents on shared decision making in medication management: A qualitative study

被引:17
|
作者
Sawan, Mouna J. [1 ]
Jeon, Yun-Hee [2 ]
Hilmer, Sarah N. [3 ,4 ]
Chen, Timothy F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Sydney Pharm Sch, Fac Med & Hlth, Rm N347,Pharm & Bank Bldg A15, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Fac Med & Hlth, Sydney Nursing Sch, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
[3] Royal North Shore Hosp, Kolling Inst Med Res, Clin Pharmacol & Aged Care, St Leonards, NSW, Australia
[4] Univ Sydney, St Leonards, NSW, Australia
关键词
decision making; medications; patient-physician communication; deprescribing; long-term care; patient education; NURSING-HOME RESIDENTS; PSYCHOTROPIC MEDICINES; HEALTH LOCUS; OLDER-ADULTS; BARRIERS; FACILITATORS; PREFERENCES;
D O I
10.1017/S1041610222000205
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Objectives: Shared decision making is the process in which the person, their representative, and health care professional share information with each other, participate in the decision-making process, and agree on a course of action. At present, very little is known about shared decision making (SDM) in medication management from the perspective of long-term care facility residents. The objective of this study was to identify residents' beliefs, motivation, and aspects of the environment that facilitate or impede SDM. Design: A qualitative study was conducted using face-to-face semi-structured interviews, and data analysis was carried out using a thematic approach. Setting: Six long-term care facilities in Sydney, Australia. Participants: Thirty-one residents. Results: Enablers to resident involvement in SDM were resident beliefs in exercising their right to take part in medication-related decisions, preference to maintain control over decisions, and motivation to raise concern about medication. Residents were not motivated to be involved in SDM if they believed they had no control over life circumstance, perceived that medications were necessary, or experienced no problems with their medications. Participation in SDM was hindered by limitations in opportunities for resident involvement, engagement with staff and primary care physician to discuss issues related to medications, and continuity of care with their regular physician. Conclusion: This study highlights that the residents' beliefs in control over decisions and concerns about medication are a significant function of the SDM process. It is important that residents are given the choice to take part in SDM, their beliefs and values regarding SDM are understood, and the culture of the care facility respects residents' right to participate in SDM.
引用
收藏
页码:929 / 939
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] NURSES' PERSPECTIVES ON MEDICATION ADMINISTRATION SAFETY FOR RESIDENTS IN NURSING HOMES: A QUALITATIVE STUDY
    Shieu, Bianca
    Wang, Mei-Chen
    Harris, John
    Lee, Ya-Wen
    INNOVATION IN AGING, 2024, 8 : 1209 - 1210
  • [42] OVER-THE-COUNTER MEDICATION USE AND DECISION-MAKING AMONG RESIDENTS OF SENIOR LIVING COMMUNITIES: A QUALITATIVE STUDY
    Paliwal, Y.
    Slattum, P.
    Jones, R. M.
    Moczygemba, L.
    Gendron, T.
    Nadpara, P. A.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2017, 20 (05) : A14 - A14
  • [43] Shared decision-making performance of general practice residents: an observational study combining observer, resident, and patient perspectives
    Baghus, Anouk
    Giroldi, Esther
    van Geel, Jasper
    Leferink, Arthur
    van de Pol, Marjolein H. J.
    Sanders, Ariette
    Dielissen, Patrick W.
    Bisschop, Isabella
    Pieterse, Arwen H.
    Muris, Jean W. M.
    Timmerman, Angelique A.
    van der Weijden, Trudy
    FAMILY PRACTICE, 2024, 41 (01) : 50 - 59
  • [44] Prescribing decision making by medical residents on night shifts: A qualitative study
    Lauffenburger, Julie C.
    Coll, Maxwell D.
    Kim, Erin
    Robertson, Ted
    Oran, Rebecca
    Haff, Nancy
    Hanken, Kaitlin
    Avorn, Jerry
    Choudhry, Niteesh K.
    MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2022, 56 (10) : 1032 - 1041
  • [45] Shared Decision-Making in Hemophilic Arthropathy Rehabilitation: A Qualitative Study
    Liu, Yan-Qiu
    Guo, Yu-Lin
    Xu, Jia
    Geng, Wen-Jing
    Li, Zhen-Zhen
    Jia, Ming
    Liu, Yu-Dan
    Zhao, Hua
    PATIENT PREFERENCE AND ADHERENCE, 2023, 17 : 249 - 257
  • [46] Practitioners' views on shared decision-making implementation: A qualitative study
    Ankolekar, A.
    Steffensen, K. Dahl
    Olling, K.
    Dekker, A.
    Wee, L.
    Roumen, C.
    Hasannejadasl, H.
    Fijten, R.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2022, 170 : S883 - S884
  • [47] What makes a patient ready for Shared Decision Making? A qualitative study
    Keij, Sascha M.
    Van Duijn-Bakker, Nanny
    Stiggelbout, Anne M.
    Pieterse, Arwen H.
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2021, 104 (03) : 571 - 577
  • [48] Shared decision-making for postoperative analgesia A semistructured qualitative study
    van den Berg, Amalia M. A.
    Stalmeier, Peep F. M.
    Scheffer, Gert Jan
    Hermens, Rosella P.
    Bucx, Martin J. L.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2019, 36 (01) : 25 - 31
  • [49] Shared clinical decision-making experiences in nursing: a qualitative study
    Fen-Fang Chung
    Pao-Yu Wang
    Shu-Chuan Lin
    Yu-Hsia Lee
    Hon-Yen Wu
    Mei-Hsiang Lin
    BMC Nursing, 20
  • [50] Shared decision making in consultations for hypertension: Qualitative study in general practice
    Johnson, Rachel
    Turner, Katrina
    Feder, Gene
    Cramer, Helen
    HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2021, 24 (03) : 917 - 929