3D Diverging Waves With 2D Sparse Arrays: A Feasibility Study

被引:4
|
作者
Roux, Emmanuel [1 ]
Varray, Francois [2 ]
Petrusca, Lorena [2 ]
Mattesini, Paolo [1 ,2 ]
Cachard, Christian [2 ]
Tortoli, Piero [1 ]
Liebgott, Herve [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florence, Dept Informat Engn, Florence, Italy
[2] Univ Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Univ Lyon, INSA Lyon,CNRS,INSERM, UJM St Etienne,CREATIS,UMR 5220,U1206, F-69621 Lyon, France
关键词
3D ultrasound imaging; ultrafast imaging; diverging waves; 2D sparse arrays; phantom;
D O I
10.1109/ULTSYM.2017.8092408
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
This work shows the feasibility of performing ultrafast 3D ultrasound imaging by producing diverging waves (DW) with 2D sparse arrays. The 3D volumes were experimentally acquired by individually driving the 1024 elements of a full 32x32 matrix array. The volumes obtained with different sparse configurations were compared to those obtained with two references arrays: the full 32x32 array and a dense array of 716 elements where obtained by de-activating the corner elements of the full array. The comparison criteria were the lateral resolution using the full width at half maximum (FWHM) and the contrast to noise ratio (CNR), measured on the images obtained by scanning a grayscale phantom. The results show that ultrafast 3D ultrasound imaging can be performed with a reduced number of channels using 2D sparse arrays. However, there is still space to find the optimal 2D sparse array configurations to best transmit 3D DWs and potential improvements on image quality may be achieved with dedicated optimization e.g. cost function to homogenize DW wave front.
引用
收藏
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] MIMO Arrays Versus Conventional Thin Arrays for 2D and 3D Radar Applications
    Mietzner, Jan
    2017 EUROPEAN RADAR CONFERENCE (EURAD), 2017, : 110 - 113
  • [22] The directed cooperative assembly of proteorhodopsin into 2D and 3D polarized arrays
    Liang, Hongjun
    Whited, Gregg
    Nguyen, Chi
    Stucky, Galen D.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2007, 104 (20) : 8212 - 8217
  • [23] Laser fabrication of 2D and 3D metal nanoparticle structures and arrays
    Kuznetsov, A. I.
    Kiyan, R.
    Chichkov, B. N.
    OPTICS EXPRESS, 2010, 18 (20): : 21198 - 21203
  • [24] Engineering Crystalline Protein Arrays for Functionalized 2D and 3D Biomaterials
    Rad, Behzad
    Ajo-Franklin, Caroline M.
    Manea, Francesca
    Garda, Virginia G.
    BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2021, 120 (03) : 88A - 89A
  • [25] Design of 2D and 3D arrays from engineered amyloid proteins
    Bononi, Fernanda
    Bononi, Fernanda
    Toney, Michael
    PROTEIN SCIENCE, 2017, 26 : 57 - 57
  • [26] PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF 2D AND 3D ANTENNA ARRAYS FOR SOURCE LOCALIZATION
    Dinh Thang Vu
    Renaux, Alexandre
    Boyer, Remy
    Marcos, Sylvie
    18TH EUROPEAN SIGNAL PROCESSING CONFERENCE (EUSIPCO-2010), 2010, : 661 - 665
  • [27] STACKING 2D DROPLET ARRAYS FOR 3D CONFIGURABLE DROPLET NETWORK
    Yasuga, Hiroki
    Osaki, Toshihisa
    Kamiya, Koki
    Iseri, Emre
    van der Wijngaart, Wouter
    Takeuch, Shoji
    Miki, Norihisa
    2019 IEEE 32ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MICRO ELECTRO MECHANICAL SYSTEMS (MEMS), 2019, : 387 - 388
  • [28] Design of 2D and 3D Differential Microphone Arrays With a Multistage Framework
    Zhao, Xudong
    Huang, Gongping
    Chen, Jingdong
    Benesty, Jacob
    IEEE-ACM TRANSACTIONS ON AUDIO SPEECH AND LANGUAGE PROCESSING, 2023, 31 : 2016 - 2031
  • [29] 3D versus 2D/3D shape descriptors:: A comparative study
    Zaharia, T
    Prêteux, F
    IMAGE PROCESSING: ALGORITHMS AND SYSTEMS III, 2004, 5298 : 47 - 58
  • [30] 2D or not 2D That is the Question, but 3D is the, answer
    Cronin, Paul
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2007, 14 (07) : 769 - 771