Pitfalls of the EU's Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism

被引:39
|
作者
Lim, Byeongho [1 ]
Hong, Kyoungseo [2 ]
Yoon, Jooyoung [3 ]
Chang, Jeong-In [4 ]
Cheong, Inkyo [5 ]
机构
[1] Korea Maritime Inst, Pusan 4911, South Korea
[2] NYU, Grad Sch Arts & Sci, New York, NY 10016 USA
[3] Sunchon Natl Univ, Dept Int Trade, Sunchon 57922, South Korea
[4] Korea Maritime Inst, Busan 4911, South Korea
[5] Inha Univ, Dept Int Trade, Incheon 22212, South Korea
关键词
carbon border adjustment mechanism (CBAM); general agreement on tariffs and trade (GATT); carbon border tax; carbon emissions; carbon pricingfi; TRADE; CLIMATE; LEAKAGE; TAX; POLICIES; IMPACT;
D O I
10.3390/en14217303
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The European Union (EU), which has led international discussions on global warming, officially announced its plan for the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) in July 2021. Many existing studies have indicated the CBAM will curtail greenhouse gases, and will subsequently be positive in terms of reducing global warming. However, serious legal issues and trade disputes are expected in terms of the compatibility of the CBAM with the trade rules of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT). Contrary to the EU's explanation, the international community has a strong view of CBAM as a new trade barrier under the guise of preventing global warming. Above all, this is because it is an arbitrary measure by the EU and not the one that has been internationally agreed upon. Therefore, this paper tries to identify the pitfalls and estimate the global cost of CBAM, arguing that the mechanism is not in line with international trade rules, and that many countries will not sit back and suffer from it. The world economy will inevitably face a vicious cycle of trade retaliation. The CBAM will drive up trade costs and cause another trade distortion. While the goal of preventing climate change is good, the CBAM scheme is too costly for the world economy.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A Comparative Study on the Impact of EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism on Korea, China, and Japan
    Kitetu, Geoffrey Musyoki
    Ko, Jong-Hwan
    JOURNAL OF KOREA TRADE, 2024, 28 (06):
  • [42] Evaluating current effects of upcoming EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: Evidence from China's futures market
    Lin, Boqiang
    Zhao, Hengsong
    ENERGY POLICY, 2023, 177
  • [43] Leveraging natural language processing techniques to explore the potential impact of the EU's Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM)
    Curran, Louise
    Carrasco-Farre, Carlos
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS POLICY, 2024, 7 (02) : 181 - 202
  • [44] Making the EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism acceptable and climate friendly for least developed countries
    Perdana, Sigit
    Vielle, Marc
    ENERGY POLICY, 2022, 170
  • [45] (Re)framing Responsibility? Assessing the Division of Burdens Under the EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism
    Dobson, Natalie L.
    UTRECHT LAW REVIEW, 2022, 18 (02): : 162 - 179
  • [46] Impact of the EU carbon border adjustment mechanism on economic growth and resources supply in the BASIC countries
    Gu, Rongrong
    Guo, Ji
    Huang, Yuxiang
    Wu, Xianhua
    RESOURCES POLICY, 2023, 85
  • [47] Making the EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism acceptable and climate friendly for least developed countries
    Perdana, Sigit
    Vielle, Marc
    Energy Policy, 2022, 170
  • [48] French Tax for EU: Genesis of Cross Border Carbon Adjustment
    Roginko, S. A.
    CONTEMPORARY EUROPE-SOVREMENNAYA EVROPA, 2022, (05): : 64 - 77
  • [49] Could the EU carbon border adjustment mechanism promote climate mitigation? An economy-wide analysis
    Zhang, Kun
    Yao, Yun-Fei
    Qian, Xiang-Yan
    Zhang, Yu-Fei
    Liang, Qiao-Mei
    Wei, Yi-Ming
    ADVANCES IN CLIMATE CHANGE RESEARCH, 2024, 15 (03) : 557 - 571
  • [50] A Concept of ⟪Carbon Leakage⟫ as a Basis for EU Cross-Border Carbon Adjustment
    Roginko, S. A.
    Alekseev, P., V
    CONTEMPORARY EUROPE-SOVREMENNAYA EVROPA, 2022, (07): : 92 - 106