Targets missed: predictors of MRI-targeted biopsy failing to accurately localize prostate cancer found on systematic biopsy

被引:22
|
作者
Coker, Michael Austin [1 ]
Glaser, Zachary A. [1 ]
Gordetsky, Jennifer B. [1 ,2 ]
Thomas, John, V [3 ]
Rais-Bahrami, Soroush [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Dept Urol, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[2] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Dept Pathol, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[3] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Dept Radiol, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
关键词
ULTRASOUND-GUIDED BIOPSY; FUSION BIOPSY; ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE;
D O I
10.1038/s41391-018-0062-9
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)/ultrasound (US) fusion-guided biopsy has improved the ability to localize and detect prostate cancer (PCa) with efficiency surpassing systematic biopsy. Nevertheless, some patients have PCa missed using the MRI-targeted biopsy sampling alone. We aim to identify clinical and imaging parameters associated with cases where targeted biopsy did not detect PCa compared to systematic biopsy. Methods We conducted a retrospective review of patients who underwent MRI/US fusion-guided biopsy in addition to concurrent systematic, extended-sextant biopsy between 2014 and 2017. For patients with PCa detected on systematic biopsy not properly localized by MRI/US fusion-guided biopsy, the sextant distance from MRI-targeted lesion to the cancer-positive sextant was calculated and parameters potentially predicting this targeting miss were evaluated. Results In all, 35/127 (27.6%) patients with single-session MRI/US fusion-guided biopsy plus standard biopsy finding PCa had lesions incorrectly localized. Of these, 15/35 (42.9%) were identified as possible fusion-software misregistrations. The remainder, 12/35 (34.3%), represented targeted biopsies one sextant away from the cancer focus and 8/35 (22.9%) targeted biopsies two sextants away from the cancer focus. Only 7/35 (20.0%) patients were determined to have clinically significant PCa, which represents 7/127 (5.5%) of the overall population. Lower MRI lesion volumes (p = 0.022), lesion density (p < 0.001), and PIRADS scores (p < 0.001) were significantly associated with targeted biopsy missing PCa detected on systematic biopsy. Conclusion Clinically significant PCa is rarely missed utilizing MRI/US fusion-guided biopsy. With the majority of missed tumors representing targeting misregistrations or cases of low-grade cancer in sextants immediately adjacent to MRI suspicious lesions. Lower MRI lesion volumes, lesion density, and PI-RADS are predictors of cases with targeted biopsies missing cancer, for which systematic sampling of the sextants containing MRI targets and adjacent sextants would most optimize PCa detection.
引用
收藏
页码:549 / 555
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] ADDITIONAL SYSTEMATIC TO MRI-TARGETED BIOPSY IN PROSTATE CANCER DIAGNOSIS: A DOUBLE-EDGED SWORD
    Suarez-Ibarrola, Rodrigo
    Jilg, Cordula A.
    Grabbert, Markus
    Gratzke, Christian
    Sigle, August
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 207 (05): : E996 - E996
  • [42] Should we combine systematic with MRI-targeted biopsy? Implications for the management of patients with prostate cancer
    Gandaglia, Giorgio
    Giannarini, Gianluca
    Stabile, Armando
    Montorsi, Francesco
    Briganti, Alberto
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2022, 32 (11) : 7488 - 7490
  • [43] Additional systematic to MRI-targeted biopsy in prostate cancer diagnosis: A double-edged sword
    Suarez-Ibarrola, R.
    Jilg, C. A.
    Grabbert, M.
    Gratzke, C.
    Sigle, A.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2022, 81 : S690 - S690
  • [44] Can we predict for missed clinically significant prostate cancers on MRI-Targeted biopsy alone?
    Tsang, W. C.
    Wang, K.
    Quek, A. J. Y.
    Wang, Z.
    Chiong, E.
    Wu, Q.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2023, 83 : S244 - S244
  • [45] Should we combine systematic with MRI-targeted biopsy? Implications for the management of patients with prostate cancer
    Giorgio Gandaglia
    Gianluca Giannarini
    Armando Stabile
    Francesco Montorsi
    Alberto Briganti
    European Radiology, 2022, 32 : 7488 - 7490
  • [46] CAN WE PREDICT FOR MISSED CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT PROSTATE CANCERS ON MRI-TARGETED BIOPSY ALONE?
    Tsang, Woon Chau
    Wang, Kaiying
    Quek, Abner
    Wang, Ziting
    Chiong, Edmund
    Wu, Qinghui
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2023, 209 : E553 - E553
  • [47] TRIAGE MRI FOLLOWED BY MRI-TARGETED BIOPSY FOR MEN WITH PROSTATE CANCER: A DECISION ANALYSIS
    Willis, Sarah
    van der Meulen, Jan
    Miners, Alec
    Emberton, Mark
    Ahmed, Hashim
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 189 (04): : E34 - E35
  • [48] A closer look at the utility of systematic biopsy in the era of MRI-targeted prostate biopsy-Cancer detection within the umbra and penumbra
    Lee, Alvin
    Chen, Kenneth
    Cheng, Christopher
    Ho, Henry
    Yuen, John
    Ngo, Nye Thane
    Law, Yan Mee
    Tay, Kae Jack
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 29 : 71 - 72
  • [49] Comparison of clinically significant prostate cancer detection by MRI cognitive biopsy and in-bore MRI-targeted biopsy for naive biopsy patients
    Zhang, K.
    Zhang, Z.
    Zhu, G.
    Liu, M.
    Roobol, M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 26 : 82 - 82
  • [50] SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF SIGNIFICANT CANCER DETECTION BY MRI-TARGETED BIOPSY COMPARED TO SYSTEMATIC BIOPSY
    Kasivisvanathan, Veeru
    Stabile, Armando
    Neves, Joana
    Giganti, Francesco
    Valerio, Massimo
    Shanmugabavan, Yaalini
    Clement, Keiran
    Sarkar, Debashis
    Philippou, Yiannis
    Thurtle, David
    Deeks, Jon
    Emberton, Mark
    Takwoingi, Yemisi
    Moore, Caroline
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 201 (04): : E341 - E341