Targets missed: predictors of MRI-targeted biopsy failing to accurately localize prostate cancer found on systematic biopsy

被引:22
|
作者
Coker, Michael Austin [1 ]
Glaser, Zachary A. [1 ]
Gordetsky, Jennifer B. [1 ,2 ]
Thomas, John, V [3 ]
Rais-Bahrami, Soroush [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Dept Urol, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[2] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Dept Pathol, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[3] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Dept Radiol, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
关键词
ULTRASOUND-GUIDED BIOPSY; FUSION BIOPSY; ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE;
D O I
10.1038/s41391-018-0062-9
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)/ultrasound (US) fusion-guided biopsy has improved the ability to localize and detect prostate cancer (PCa) with efficiency surpassing systematic biopsy. Nevertheless, some patients have PCa missed using the MRI-targeted biopsy sampling alone. We aim to identify clinical and imaging parameters associated with cases where targeted biopsy did not detect PCa compared to systematic biopsy. Methods We conducted a retrospective review of patients who underwent MRI/US fusion-guided biopsy in addition to concurrent systematic, extended-sextant biopsy between 2014 and 2017. For patients with PCa detected on systematic biopsy not properly localized by MRI/US fusion-guided biopsy, the sextant distance from MRI-targeted lesion to the cancer-positive sextant was calculated and parameters potentially predicting this targeting miss were evaluated. Results In all, 35/127 (27.6%) patients with single-session MRI/US fusion-guided biopsy plus standard biopsy finding PCa had lesions incorrectly localized. Of these, 15/35 (42.9%) were identified as possible fusion-software misregistrations. The remainder, 12/35 (34.3%), represented targeted biopsies one sextant away from the cancer focus and 8/35 (22.9%) targeted biopsies two sextants away from the cancer focus. Only 7/35 (20.0%) patients were determined to have clinically significant PCa, which represents 7/127 (5.5%) of the overall population. Lower MRI lesion volumes (p = 0.022), lesion density (p < 0.001), and PIRADS scores (p < 0.001) were significantly associated with targeted biopsy missing PCa detected on systematic biopsy. Conclusion Clinically significant PCa is rarely missed utilizing MRI/US fusion-guided biopsy. With the majority of missed tumors representing targeting misregistrations or cases of low-grade cancer in sextants immediately adjacent to MRI suspicious lesions. Lower MRI lesion volumes, lesion density, and PI-RADS are predictors of cases with targeted biopsies missing cancer, for which systematic sampling of the sextants containing MRI targets and adjacent sextants would most optimize PCa detection.
引用
收藏
页码:549 / 555
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Targets missed: predictors of MRI-targeted biopsy failing to accurately localize prostate cancer found on systematic biopsy
    Michael Austin Coker
    Zachary A. Glaser
    Jennifer B. Gordetsky
    John V. Thomas
    Soroush Rais-Bahrami
    Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases, 2018, 21 : 549 - 555
  • [2] Prostate MRI, with or without MRI-targeted biopsy, and systematic biopsy for detecting prostate cancer
    Drost, Frank-Jan H.
    Osses, Daniel F.
    Nieboer, Daan
    Steyerberg, Ewout W.
    Bangma, Chris H.
    Roobol, Monique J.
    Schoots, Ivo G.
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2019, (04):
  • [3] RISK OF CANCER ON MRI-TARGETED AND SYSTEMATIC PROSTATE BIOPSY
    Bjurlin, Marc
    Wysock, James
    Sakar, Saradwata
    Venkataraman, Rajesh
    Rosenkrantz, Andrew
    Taneja, Samir
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 191 (04): : E416 - E417
  • [4] MRI-Targeted, Systematic, and Combined Biopsy for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis
    Ahdoot, Michael
    Wilbur, Andrew R.
    Reese, Sarah E.
    Lebastchi, Amir H.
    Mehralivand, Sherif
    Gomella, Patrick T.
    Bloom, Jonathan
    Gurram, Sandeep
    Siddiqui, Minhaj
    Pinsky, Paul
    Parnes, Howard
    Linehan, W. Marston
    Merino, Maria
    Choyke, Peter L.
    Shih, Joanna H.
    Turkbey, Baris
    Wood, Bradford J.
    Pinto, Peter A.
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2020, 382 (10): : 917 - 928
  • [5] Re: MRI-Targeted, Systematic, and Combined Biopsy for Prostate Cancer
    Radtke, Jan Philipp
    Hadaschik, Boris
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2020, 78 (02) : 291 - 292
  • [6] Value of MRI-targeted prostate biopsy in addition to systematic transperineal biopsy for detection of prostate cancer
    Uno, Hiromi
    Saito, Akihiro
    Toyota, Syohei
    Takada, Toshihiko
    Komeda, Hisao
    Nakano, Masahiro
    Deguchi, Takashi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 17 : A166 - A167
  • [7] MRI-Targeted Biopsy in Prostate Cancer Screening
    Mathew, Rebecca
    Di Santo, Pietro
    Hibbert, Benjamin
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2021, 385 (22): : 2109 - 2111
  • [8] MRI-targeted or standard biopsy in prostate cancer
    Albertsen, Peter C.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 128 (03) : 290 - 291
  • [9] OPTIMAL COMBINATION OF MRI-TARGETED BIOPSY AND SYSTEMATIC BIOPSY FOR MEN WITH SUSPICION OF PROSTATE CANCER
    Numao, Noboru
    Ito, Masaya
    Matsuoka, Yoh
    Yoshida, Soichiro
    Fujiwara, Motohiro
    Nakamura, Yuki
    Waseda, Yuma
    Moriyama, Shingo
    Nakayama, Takayuki
    Tanaka, Hajime
    Inoue, Masaharu
    Kawamura, Naoko
    Yokoyama, Minato
    Ishioka, Junichiro
    Saito, Kazutaka
    Fujii, Yasuhisa
    Kihara, Kazunori
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 195 (04): : E168 - E168
  • [10] MRI and MRI-targeted biopsy take precedence over systematic biopsy in primary prostate cancer diagnosis
    Schoots, Ivo G.
    Rouviere, Olivier
    BMJ EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE, 2019, 24 (03)