Observer assessment of femoral neck radiographs after reduction and dynamic hip screw fixation

被引:19
|
作者
Heetveld, MJ
Raaymakers, ELFB
van Walsum, ADP
Barei, DP
Steller, EP
机构
[1] Erasmus Med Ctr, Dept Trauma & Gen Surg, NL-3000 CA Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Acad Med Ctr, Trauma Unit, NL-1100 DD Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Med Spectrum Twente, Dept Surg, NL-7500 KA Enschede, Netherlands
[4] Harborview Med Ctr, Dept Orthopaed, Seattle, WA 98104 USA
[5] Sint Lucas Andreas Hosp, Dept Surg, NL-1006 AE Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
femoral neck fracture; observer variation; fracture fixation;
D O I
10.1007/s00402-004-0780-4
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction It is not known how the described methods of reduction and dynamic hip screw (DHS) fixation of displaced intracapsular femoral neck fractures translate into proper assessment of the postoperative radiographs. At teaching or evaluation sessions in daily practice, frequent discussion arises about postoperative technical assessment. The assessment of correct reduction and DHS fixation using the described methods in the literature may be subject to differences between observers. The aim of this study was to assess the extent of inter- and intraobserver agreement on technique, based on the methods in the literature, in a simulated daily practice setting. Materials and methods The postoperative anteroposterior (AP) and lateral radiographs of 35 randomly selected patients aged 60-90 years were rated twice, 2 months apart, by six surgical observers from three institutions with similar views on reduction and DHS fixation for this fracture type. The radiographs were of sufficient quality for proper assessment. Criteria for reduction and fixation could be rated as either adequate or inadequate. An adequate rating was assigned if in the observers opinion, regardless of likely outcome, technical perfection according to the described methods had been achieved. The kappa statistic was calculated as a measure of agreement. Results Fracture reduction on the AP view approached a good kappa value (0.54). Poor to moderate interobserver agreement was found for fracture reduction on the lateral view and aspects of DHS fixation (kappa 0.10-0.36). Intraobserver agreement was good for five out of six observers for reduction and DHS fixation aspects (kappa 0.51-0.81). Conclusion During routine practice six surgical observers can nearly agree on adequate fracture reduction on the AP view, but do not agree on adequate reduction on the lateral view and adequate DHS fixation on the postoperative radiographs of displaced intracapsular femoral neck fractures.
引用
收藏
页码:160 / 165
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Is new always better: comparison of the femoral neck system and the dynamic hip screw in the treatment of femoral neck fractures
    Schuetze, Konrad
    Burkhardt, Jakob
    Pankratz, Carlos
    Eickhoff, Alexander
    Boehringer, Alexander
    Degenhart, Christina
    Gebhard, Florian
    Cintean, Raffael
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2023, 143 (06) : 3155 - 3161
  • [32] Letter to the editor on the study “Dynamic hip screw fixation of subtrochanteric femoral fractures”
    R. Dinesh Iyer
    Alok Rai
    Divyansh Sharma
    Rishabh Surana
    European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, 2022, 32 : 381 - 382
  • [33] COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN PROXIMAL FEMORAL NAILING AND DYNAMIC HIP SCREW FIXATION
    Gupta, Inder Sain
    Sheetal
    Chabra, Anurag
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS, 2018, 7 (06): : 759 - 762
  • [34] Letter to the editor on the study "Dynamic hip screw fixation of subtrochanteric femoral fractures"
    Iyer, R. Dinesh
    Rai, Alok
    Sharma, Divyansh
    Surana, Rishabh
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND TRAUMATOLOGY, 2022, 32 (02): : 381 - 382
  • [35] Prophylactic dynamic screw fixation of the asymptomatic hip in slipped capital femoral epiphysis
    Kumm, DA
    Schmidt, J
    Eisenburger, SH
    Rutt, J
    Hackenbroch, MH
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC ORTHOPAEDICS, 1996, 16 (02) : 249 - 253
  • [36] Implant failure in a proximal femoral fracture treated with dynamic hip screw fixation
    Dabis, John
    Abdul-Jabar, Hani B.
    Dabis, Hosam
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL CASE REPORTS, 2015, (07):
  • [37] Calcium phosphate cement augmentation of the femoral neck defect created after dynamic hip screw removal
    Strauss, Eric J.
    Pahk, Brian
    Kummer, Frederick J.
    Egol, Kenneth
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2007, 21 (05) : 295 - 300
  • [38] Change in Femoral Offset after Closed Reduction and Dynamic Hip Screw Osteosynthesis Via Lateral Approach in Patients with Medial Femoral Neck Fracture: A Retrospective Analysis
    Meier, Marc-Pascal
    Seitz, Mark-Tilmann
    Saul, Dominik
    Gera, Roland
    Roch, Paul Jonathan
    Jaeckle, Katharina
    Lehmann, Wolfgang
    Hawellek, Thelonius
    ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2024, 16 (12) : 3118 - 3128
  • [39] Dynamic hip screw fixation versus multiple screw fixation for intracapsular hip fracture
    Jettoo, Prithee
    James, Philip
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2016, 24 (02) : 146 - 149
  • [40] Comparing Perioperative Outcome Measures of the Dynamic Hip Screw and the Femoral Neck System
    Niemann, Marcel
    Braun, Karl F.
    Ahmad, Sufian S.
    Stoeckle, Ulrich
    Maerdian, Sven
    Graef, Frank
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2022, 58 (03):