Fuzzy TOPSIS method to primary crusher selection for Golegohar Iron Mine (Iran)

被引:16
|
作者
Rahimdel, Mohammad Javad [1 ]
Karamoozian, Mohammad [2 ]
机构
[1] Sahand Univ Technol, Dept Min Engn, Tabriz 513351996, Iran
[2] Shahrood Univ Technol, Fac Min Engn Petr & Geophys, Shahrood 3619995161, Iran
关键词
primary crusher; multi-criterion decision making (MCDM); technique for order performance by similarity to ideal solution; fuzzy set theory; Golegohar Iron Mine; gyratory crusher; DECISION-MAKING;
D O I
10.1007/s11771-014-2435-0
中图分类号
TF [冶金工业];
学科分类号
0806 ;
摘要
Selection of the crusher required a great deal of design regarding to the mine planning. Selection of suitable primary crusher from all of available primary crushers is a multi-criterion decision making (MCDM) problem. The present work explores the use of technique for order performance by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) with fuzzy set theory to select best primary crusher for Golegohar Iron Mine in Iran. Gyratory, double toggle jaw, single toggle jaw, high speed roll crusher, low speed sizer, impact crusher, hammer mill and feeder breaker crushers have been considered as alternatives. Also, the capacity, feed size, product size, rock compressive strength, abrasion index and application of primary crusher for mobile plants were considered as criteria for solution of this MCDM problem. To determine the order of the alternatives, closeness coefficient is defined by calculating the distances to the fuzzy positive ideal solution (FPIS) and fuzzy negative ideal solution (FNIS). Results of our work based on fuzzy TOPSIS method show that the gyratory is the best primary crusher for the studied mine.
引用
收藏
页码:4352 / 4359
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Leadership Selection with the Fuzzy Topsis Method in the Hospitality Sector in Sultanahmet Region
    Ulucan, Ebru
    Aksakal, Nihan Yavuz
    MATHEMATICS, 2022, 10 (13)
  • [42] Parking Lot Site Selection Using a Fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS Framework in Tuyserkan, Iran
    Darani, Sasan Kazazi
    Eslami, Alireza Akbari
    Jabbari, Mona
    Asefi, Hossein
    JOURNAL OF URBAN PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT, 2018, 144 (03)
  • [43] BUSINESS COMPETITION ANALYSIS OF IRAN'S AIRLINE INDUSTRY USING FUZZY TOPSIS METHOD
    Ahang, Majid
    Taheri, Ali Mir
    Ataei, Mojtaba
    IIOAB JOURNAL, 2016, 7 : 497 - 509
  • [44] Suitable Mining Method Selection using HFGDM-TOPSIS Method: a Case Study of an Apatite Mine
    Pak, Myong Chun
    Han, Un Chol
    Kim, Dong Il
    JOURNAL OF MINING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 13 (02): : 357 - 374
  • [45] Sustainable supplier selection: A multi-criteria intuitionistic fuzzy TOPSIS method
    Memari, Ashkan
    Dargi, Ahmad
    Jokar, Mohammad Reza Akbari
    Ahmad, Robiah
    Rahim, Abd Rahman Abdul
    JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS, 2019, 50 : 9 - 24
  • [46] Clean Agent Selection Approached by Fuzzy TOPSIS Decision-Making Method
    Aiello, Giuseppe
    Enea, Mario
    Galante, Giacomo
    La Scalia, Giada
    FIRE TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 45 (04) : 405 - 418
  • [47] Selection of optimal aluminum alloy using TOPSIS method under fuzzy environment
    Bhattacharjee, Pushparenu
    Debnath, Abhiman
    Chakraborty, Sujoy
    Mandal, Uttam Kumar
    JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2017, 32 (01) : 871 - 876
  • [48] Clean Agent Selection Approached by Fuzzy TOPSIS Decision-Making Method
    Giuseppe Aiello
    Mario Enea
    Giacomo Galante
    Giada La Scalia
    Fire Technology, 2009, 45
  • [49] A Novel Interval Valued Picture Fuzzy TOPSIS Method: Application on Supplier Selection
    Kahraman, Cengiz
    Oztaysi, Basar
    Onar, Sezi Cevik
    JOURNAL OF MULTIPLE-VALUED LOGIC AND SOFT COMPUTING, 2022, 39 (5-6) : 615 - 635
  • [50] Selection of Business Process Modeling Tool with the Application of Fuzzy DEMATEL and TOPSIS Method
    Jin, Guangying
    Jin, Guangzhe
    Huo, Haibo
    AXIOMS, 2022, 11 (11)