Newton Power Flow Methods for Unbalanced Three-Phase Distribution Networks

被引:42
|
作者
Sereeter, Baljinnyam [1 ]
Vuik, Kees [1 ]
Witteveen, Cees [1 ]
机构
[1] Delft Univ Technol, Fac Elect Engn Math & Comp Sci, Mekelweg 4, NL-2628 CD Delft, Netherlands
来源
ENERGIES | 2017年 / 10卷 / 10期
关键词
power flow analysis; Newton-Raphson method; three-phase; unbalanced; distribution networks; EFFICIENT LOAD FLOW; DISTRIBUTION-SYSTEMS; ALGORITHM; MODELS;
D O I
10.3390/en10101658
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Two mismatch functions (power or current) and three coordinates (polar, Cartesian and complex form) result in six versions of the Newton-Raphson method for the solution of power flow problems. In this paper, five new versions of the Newton power flow method developed for single-phase problems in our previous paper are extended to three-phase power flow problems. Mathematical models of the load, load connection, transformer, and distributed generation (DG) are presented. A three-phase power flow formulation is described for both power and current mismatch functions. Extended versions of the Newton power flow method are compared with the backward-forward sweep-based algorithm. Furthermore, the convergence behavior for different loading conditions, R/X ratios, and load models, is investigated by numerical experiments on balanced and unbalanced distribution networks. On the basis of these experiments, we conclude that two versions using the current mismatch function in polar and Cartesian coordinates perform the best for both balanced and unbalanced distribution networks.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Three-phase Newton Raphson Power Flow considering Microgeneration
    Zimmer, V.
    Tenfen, D.
    Decker, I. C.
    Lemos, F. A. B.
    2013 IEEE PES CONFERENCE ON INNOVATIVE SMART GRID TECHNOLOGIES (ISGT LATIN AMERICA), 2013,
  • [42] Three-phase power-flow by direct ZBR method for unbalanced radial distribution systems
    Chen, T. -H.
    Yang, N. -C.
    IET GENERATION TRANSMISSION & DISTRIBUTION, 2009, 3 (10) : 903 - 910
  • [43] Unbalanced Three-Phase Distribution System Power Flow with Distributed Generation using Affine Arithmetic
    Xue, Feng
    Xie, Weilun
    Xie, Peicheng
    Pan, Zhengning
    Ren, Jiayi
    Nie, Yinghui
    Wang, Xuchong
    Chen, Ming
    2015 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ELECTRIC UTILITY DEREGULATION AND RESTRUCTURING AND POWER TECHNOLOGIES (DRPT 2015), 2015, : 822 - 829
  • [44] An interval power flow for unbalanced distribution systems based on the Three-Phase Current Injection Method
    Rodrigues Junior, Heitor M.
    Melo, Igor D.
    Nepomuceno, Erivelton G.
    International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems, 2022, 139
  • [45] Loop frame of reference based three-phase power flow for unbalanced radial distribution systems
    Chen, Tsai-Hsiang
    Yang, Nien-Che
    ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2010, 80 (07) : 799 - 806
  • [46] Unbalanced three-phase power flow calculation for distributed power generation system
    Key Laboratory of Power System Simulation and Control, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
    不详
    Dianli Zidonghua Shebei Electr. Power Autom. Equip., 2007, 8 (11-15):
  • [47] Three-Phase Unbalanced Voltage/VAR Optimization for Active Distribution Networks
    Zhao, Jinquan
    Liu, Xu
    Lin, Changnian
    Wei, Wenhui
    2016 IEEE POWER AND ENERGY SOCIETY GENERAL MEETING (PESGM), 2016,
  • [48] PowerFlowMultiNet: Multigraph Neural Networks for Unbalanced Three-Phase Distribution Systems
    Ghamizi, Salah
    Cao, Jun
    Ma, Aoxiang
    Rodriguez, Pedro
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2025, 40 (01) : 1148 - 1151
  • [49] Flexible and curtailable resource activation in three-phase unbalanced distribution networks
    Hashmi, Md Umar
    Koirala, Arpan
    Ergun, Hakan
    Van Hertem, Dirk
    ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2022, 212
  • [50] A Three-Phase State Estimation in Unbalanced Distribution Networks with Switch Modelling
    Majumdar, Ankur
    Pal, Bikash C.
    2016 IEEE FIRST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONTROL, MEASUREMENT AND INSTRUMENTATION (CMI), 2016, : 474 - 478