Identifying the critical mechanisms for rock engineering design

被引:11
|
作者
Jiao, Y [1 ]
Hudson, JA
机构
[1] Rock Engn Consultants, Welwyn Garden City, Herts, England
[2] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, London SW7 2AZ, England
来源
GEOTECHNIQUE | 1998年 / 48卷 / 03期
关键词
design; excavation; failure; numerical modelling and analysis; rocks rock mechanics;
D O I
10.1680/geot.1998.48.3.319
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
In this paper, a methodology called 'mechanism pathway analysis' (MPA) is introduced. The methodology has been developed to support rock engineering design and treats rock engineering as a system, considering all the mechanisms simultaneously operating in the system and how they contribute to determining the rock mass response to engineering perturbations. Through a mechanism network, structured by system variables and binary mechanisms, all the mechanism pathways are searched and their effects are integrated to form the global interactions between all pairs of variables in the system. By studying the pathways and the global interactions, the critical mechanism combinations and hence the principal problems for rock engineering design in any given project can be identified. The methodology can be applied to all rock engineering problems. The procedure for implementing the approach is illustrated by a case example of identifying the key mechanisms in designing unlined rack storage caverns for pressurized-gas storage. Fourteen state variables are used to describe the gas storage system, the interactions between these variables are established and the global influences of the variables are assessed. Closed pathways, i.e. feedback loops, are often critical mechanism pathways and are identified in this case example from the variables 'grouting' and 'temperature'. Critical pathways from 'water pressure' to 'displacement' and from 'stress' to 'displacement' are also identified.
引用
收藏
页码:319 / 335
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Putting Geological Focus Back into Rock Engineering Design
    Trevor G. Carter
    Vassilis Marinos
    Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2020, 53 : 4487 - 4508
  • [32] Principles of Risk-Based Rock Engineering Design
    Johan Spross
    Håkan Stille
    Fredrik Johansson
    Arild Palmstrøm
    Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2020, 53 : 1129 - 1143
  • [33] Putting Geological Focus Back into Rock Engineering Design
    Carter, Trevor G.
    Marinos, Vassilis
    ROCK MECHANICS AND ROCK ENGINEERING, 2020, 53 (10) : 4487 - 4508
  • [34] Principles of Risk-Based Rock Engineering Design
    Spross, Johan
    Stille, Hakan
    Johansson, Fredrik
    Palmstrom, Arild
    ROCK MECHANICS AND ROCK ENGINEERING, 2020, 53 (03) : 1129 - 1143
  • [35] Translating Critical Design: Agonism in Engineering Education
    Malazita, James W.
    DESIGN ISSUES, 2018, 34 (04) : 96 - 109
  • [36] Systems Engineering-Based Tool For Identifying Critical Research Systems
    Abbott, Rodman P.
    Stracener, Jerrell
    JOURNAL OF RESEARCH ADMINISTRATION, 2016, 47 (02) : 11 - 31
  • [37] Predicting hazards in rock engineering using critical mechanism pathway analysis
    Jiao, Y
    Hudson, JA
    EUROCK '96/TORINO/ITALY - PREDICTION AND PERFORMANCE IN ROCK MECHANICS AND ROCK ENGINEERING, PROCEEDINGS, VOLS 1 AND 2, 1996, : 1197 - 1204
  • [38] Engineering Parameters in Bioreactor's Design: A Critical Aspect in Tissue Engineering
    Salehi-Nik, Nasim
    Amoabediny, Ghassem
    Pouran, Behdad
    Tabesh, Hadi
    Shokrgozar, Mohammad Ali
    Haghighipour, Nooshin
    Khatibi, Nahid
    Anisi, Fatemeh
    Mottaghy, Khosrow
    Zandieh-Doulabi, Behrouz
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 2013
  • [39] A critical review of rock slope failure mechanisms: The importance of structural geology
    Stead, Doug
    Wolter, Andrea
    JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL GEOLOGY, 2015, 74 : 1 - 23
  • [40] IDENTIFYING ABET-WORTHY DESIGN CONTENT IN AN ENGINEERING COURSE
    WOODWARD, JB
    ENGINEERING EXCELLENCE : PEOPLE MAKE THE DIFFERENCE, VOLS 1-3, 1989, : 1153 - 1155