Intraoperative Fluorescence Angiography in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Identifying Risk Factors and Outcomes

被引:1
|
作者
Samuel, Ankhita R. [1 ]
Stranix, John T. [1 ]
DeGeorge, Brent R., Jr. [1 ]
Black, Jonathan S. [1 ]
Campbell, Chris A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Virginia, Dept Plast Surg, Box 800376, Charlottesville, VA 22903 USA
关键词
breast reconstruction; mastectomy; angiography; alloplastic; autologous; SKIN FLAP NECROSIS; INDOCYANINE GREEN ANGIOGRAPHY; MASTECTOMY; PREDICT; VIABILITY; DYE;
D O I
10.1097/SAP.0000000000003215
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Intraoperative fluorescence angiography (FA) has been described as a useful adjunct to physical examination in predicting mastectomy skin flap viability for immediate breast reconstruction. Its use has been described as a screening tool for mastectomy skin flap viability as well as a test used only for patients at high risk for mastectomy skin flap loss. We performed a national database review of implant-based breast reconstruction surgeries to determine the practice patterns of FA in this patient cohort and to determine if this technology impacted clinical outcomes. Methods A national insurance claims database was reviewed to select patients having undergone direct-to-implant (DTI) and immediate tissue expander (TE) placement with and without intraoperative FA as well as patients who had FA at the time of mastectomy without reconstruction. Patient characteristics that prompted FA and postoperative outcomes with and without FA were evaluated to determine its clinical impact in the observed practice pattern. Results Of the 48,464 patients identified, 836 had FA. More than twice as many patients undergoing DTI had FA than patients undergoing immediate TE placement (10.4% vs 5%, P < 0.0001). Twelve percent of patients receiving FA at the time of mastectomy had reconstruction delayed. Fluorescence angiography was associated with a trend toward lower overall complication rates in DTI patients (8.0% vs 11.9% without FA) but a significantly higher overall complication rate with immediate TE placement (13.8% vs 10.5% without FA, P = 0.018) and was associated with higher reoperation (12.0% vs 8.3% without FA, P = 0.037) in the TE group. There was no difference in other individual complications, readmission, or explantation for either clinical group with and without FA. Regression analysis identified obesity (odds ratio, 1.32; P < 0.001) and younger age (odds ratio, 1.74; P < 0.001) to be associated with performing FA, whereas obesity, diabetes, and tobacco use were associated with higher complication rates. Conclusions Younger and otherwise healthier obese patients were more likely to have FA. A greater proportion of DTI patients had FA than TE patients with improved outcomes in the former group and worse outcomes in the latter group. Obesity, tobacco use, and diabetes were associated with worse outcomes, whereas only obesity was associated with FA use.
引用
收藏
页码:207 / 213
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] An Analysis of the Motivating and Risk Factors for Conversion from Implant-Based to Total Autologous Breast Reconstruction
    Tadiparthi, Sujatha
    Staley, Helen
    Collis, Nicholas
    O'Donoghue, Joe M.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2013, 132 (01) : 23 - 33
  • [22] Risk factors for complications and implant loss after prepectoral implant-based immediate breast reconstruction: medium-term outcomes in a prospective cohort
    Dave, R. V.
    Vucicevic, A.
    Barrett, E.
    Highton, L.
    Johnson, R.
    Kirwan, C. C.
    Harvey, J. R.
    Murphy, J.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 108 (05) : 534 - 541
  • [23] Risk factors for implant failure following revision surgery in breast cancer patients with a previous immediate implant-based breast reconstruction
    Frisell, A.
    Lagergren, J.
    Halle, M.
    de Boniface, J.
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2020, 184 (03) : 977 - 984
  • [24] Risk factors for implant failure following revision surgery in breast cancer patients with a previous immediate implant-based breast reconstruction
    A. Frisell
    J. Lagergren
    M. Halle
    J. de Boniface
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2020, 184 : 977 - 984
  • [25] Implant Loss and Associated Risk Factors following Implant-based Breast Reconstructions
    Blok, Yara L.
    van Lierop, Evelien
    Plat, Victor D.
    Corion, Leonard U. M.
    Verduijn, Pieter S.
    Krekel, Nicole M. A.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2021, 9 (07) : E3708
  • [26] Desmoid Tumor and Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction
    Kilmartin, Catherine
    Westover, Clinton
    Raghavan, Shyam
    Dillon, Patrick M.
    Campbell, Chris A.
    CASE REPORTS IN ONCOLOGY, 2023, 16 (01): : 74 - 80
  • [27] Comparing Outcomes in the Therapeutic and Prophylactic Breast for Bilateral Mastectomy With Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction
    Peoples, Abigail E.
    Waler, Alexandria R.
    Duet, Mary L.
    Prabhu, Shamit S.
    Katz, Adam J.
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2023, 90 (6S) : S375 - S378
  • [28] Robotics in Implant-Based and Autologous Breast Reconstruction
    King, Brody W.
    McCarter, Jacob H.
    Burns, Heather R.
    Soleimani, Shirin
    Maricevich, Marco A.
    Yu, Jessie Z.
    SEMINARS IN PLASTIC SURGERY, 2023, 37 (03) : 168 - 175
  • [29] Prophylactic Antibiotics in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction
    Kelley, Katherine
    Viennas, Lambros
    AMERICAN SURGEON, 2018, 84 (07) : E212 - E214
  • [30] Recent Advances in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction
    Sadeghi, Payam
    Aryan, Negaar
    Sisti, Andrea
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2021, 147 (05) : 875E - 876E