Kinematic Variability in Running: A Caution Regarding Use of the Spanning Set Measure

被引:2
|
作者
Hanlon, Michael [1 ]
Kearney, Philip [2 ]
Condell, Joan [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ulster, Sport & Exercise Sci Res Inst, Jordanstown, North Ireland
[2] Univ Chichester, Fac Sport Educ & Social Sci, Chichester, W Sussex, England
[3] Univ Ulster, Comp Sci Res Inst, Coleraine BT52 1SA, Londonderry, North Ireland
关键词
spanning set; mean deviation; intertrial variability; movement variability; coefficient of variation; MOVEMENT VARIABILITY;
D O I
10.1123/jab.28.1.99
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
The spanning set technique quantifies intertrial variability as the span between polynomial curves representing upper and lower standard deviation curves of a repeated movement. This study aimed to assess the validity of the spanning set technique in quantifying variability and specifically to determine its sensitivity to variability presented at different phases of a movement cycle. Knee angle data were recorded from a male participant completing 12 overground running trials. Variability was added to each running trial at five different phases of the running stride. Ten variability magnitudes were also used to assess the effect of variability magnitude on the spanning set measure. Variability was quantified in all trials using mean deviation and the spanning set measure. Results of a repeated-measures ANOVA showed significant differences between the spanning set score for trials using different phases of added variability. In contrast, mean deviation values showed no difference related to the phase of added variability. Therefore, the spanning set technique cannot be recommended as a valid measure of intertrial movement variability.
引用
收藏
页码:99 / 104
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] PROCESSPERFORMANCE: A portable and easy-to-use tool to measure resource consumption of running processes
    Garcia, Miguel
    Quiroga, Jose
    Ortin, Francisco
    SOFTWARE IMPACTS, 2022, 11
  • [32] Effect of Running Speed on Achilles Tendon Injury Potential: Use of a Weighted Impulse Measure
    Baggaley, Michael
    Edwards, W. Brent
    MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2017, 49 (05): : 139 - 139
  • [33] USE OF 2-DIMENSIONAL SAGITTAL KINEMATIC VARIABLES TO ESTIMATE GROUND REACTION FORCE DURING RUNNING
    White, Joshua D.
    Carson, Nina
    Baum, Brian S.
    Reinking, Mark F.
    McPoil, Thomas G.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPORTS PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2019, 14 (02): : 174 - 179
  • [34] Sand specialists and Non-specialists use Similar Kinematic Strategies for Running on Incline Granular Media
    Mantilla, D. C.
    Tucker, E. L.
    Hsieh, S. T.
    INTEGRATIVE AND COMPARATIVE BIOLOGY, 2020, 60 : E150 - E150
  • [35] SOME CAUTIONARY NOTES REGARDING THE USE OF AGGREGATED SCORES AS A MEASURE OF BEHAVIORAL STABILITY
    DAY, HD
    MARSHALL, D
    HAMILTON, B
    CHRISTY, J
    JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN PERSONALITY, 1983, 17 (01) : 97 - 109
  • [36] THE USE OF CONSUMER PANELS TO MEASURE THE VARIABILITY OF BEEF FROM DIFFERENT SOURCES
    HARDHAM, LE
    COOK, GL
    DILWORTH, AW
    HARRINGTON, G
    ANIMAL PRODUCTION, 1984, 38 (JUN): : 532 - 532
  • [37] USE OF ENERGY-COST AND VARIABILITY IN STRIDE LENGTH TO ASSESS AN OPTIMAL RUNNING ADAPTATION
    BRISSWALTER, J
    LEGROS, P
    PERCEPTUAL AND MOTOR SKILLS, 1995, 80 (01) : 99 - 104
  • [38] Full-term newborn infant with blistering skin lesions-Caution regarding use of pain medications
    Hussain, Aamir
    Sanders, Melinda
    Riotte, Clare
    Hussain, Naveed
    PEDIATRIC DERMATOLOGY, 2019, 36 (03) : 362 - 364
  • [39] An Innovative Way to Measure the Quality of a Neural Network Without the Use of a Test Set
    Giovanni, Pilato
    Filippo, Sorbello
    Giorgio, Vassallo
    Journal of Advanced Computational Intelligence and Intelligent Informatics, 2001, 5 (01) : 31 - 36
  • [40] The use of a running wheel to measure activity in rodents: Relationship to energy balance, general activity, and reward
    Novak, Colleen M.
    Burghardt, Paul R.
    Levine, James A.
    NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS, 2012, 36 (03): : 1001 - 1014