A dynamic model of firm activities: Evidence from Danish manufacturing

被引:1
|
作者
Abreha, Kaleb G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Aarhus Univ, Dept Management, Aarhus, Denmark
来源
WORLD ECONOMY | 2019年 / 42卷 / 03期
关键词
dynamic discrete choice model; exporting; firm heterogeneity; importing; Markov Chain Monte Carlo; EXPORT PROMOTION; TRADE LIBERALIZATION; INTERNATIONAL-TRADE; INTERMEDIATE INPUTS; LEVEL EVIDENCE; PRODUCTIVITY; HETEROGENEITY; ENTRY; COLOMBIA; DECISION;
D O I
10.1111/twec.12665
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This paper structurally estimates a dynamic discrete choice model of exporting and importing. The model provides a framework to analyse the determinants of a firm's decision to export and import while allowing for its current decision to affect its future productivity. Considering a panel of Danish manufacturing firms over the period 2000-07, a simple description of the data reveals considerable firm heterogeneity; significant export and import activity premia; frequent incidence of simultaneous exporting and importing; and high persistence in the scope of firm trading. Structural estimation of the model shows a marked difference in the demand elasticities in which export markets are characterised by more elastic demand, tougher competition and lower markup than the domestic market. The estimates also indicate that firms with larger capital holding and paying higher wages are cost-efficient even after controlling for their productivity. Additionally, the estimates imply substantial sunk and fixed costs of exporting and importing, and these are consistent with the hypothesis of self-selection of productive firms into trading. There also exists a positive correlation between the size of these costs and the scale of firm operation. Moreover, both exporting and importing improve firm productivity, and therefore, these learning effects further drive the self-selection process.
引用
收藏
页码:901 / 935
页数:35
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Digitalization and Firm Value: The Evidence from China's Manufacturing Enterprises
    Zhang, Yan
    Zhang, Jiao
    Lu, Yang
    Ji, Feng
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2025, 17 (06)
  • [42] Firm size, age and efficiency: Evidence from Kenyan manufacturing firms
    Lundvall, K
    Battese, GE
    JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT STUDIES, 2000, 36 (03): : 146 - 163
  • [43] Minimum Wages and Firm Productivity: Evidence from Vietnamese Manufacturing Firms
    Dong Xuan Nguyen
    INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2019, 33 (03) : 560 - 572
  • [44] Firm Heterogeneity in the Choice of Offshoring: Evidence from Korean Manufacturing Firms
    Hyun, Hea-Jung
    ASIAN ECONOMIC PAPERS, 2010, 9 (01) : 157 - 178
  • [45] Dynamics of investment and firm performance: comparative evidence from manufacturing industries
    Grazzi, Marco
    Jacoby, Nadia
    Treibich, Tania
    EMPIRICAL ECONOMICS, 2016, 51 (01) : 125 - 179
  • [46] Broadband adoption and firm productivity: Evidence from Irish manufacturing firms
    Haller, Stefanie A.
    Lyons, Sean
    TELECOMMUNICATIONS POLICY, 2015, 39 (01) : 1 - 13
  • [47] Pandemic crisis and firm survival: evidence from the Italian manufacturing industry
    Cutrini, Eleonora
    Ninivaggi, Federico
    JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL AND BUSINESS ECONOMICS, 2024, 51 (02): : 265 - 297
  • [48] Political uncertainty and firm entry: Evidence from Chinese manufacturing industries
    Chen, Shaojian
    Mao, Hui
    Feng, Zongxian
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2020, 120 : 16 - 30
  • [49] Manufacturing Input Servitization, Firm Innovation, and Export: Evidence From China
    Yu, Linhui
    Liu, Ruoxi
    Wang, Sai
    WORLD ECONOMY, 2025,
  • [50] Drivers of firm growth: micro-evidence from Indian manufacturing
    Nanditha Mathew
    Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 2017, 27 : 585 - 611