Wearable technology in orthopedic trauma surgery-An AO trauma survey and review of current and future applications

被引:10
|
作者
Braun, Benedikt J. [1 ]
Grimm, Bernd [2 ]
Hanflik, Andrew M. [3 ]
Richter, Peter H. [4 ]
Sivananthan, Sureshan [5 ]
Yarboro, Seth Robert [6 ]
Marmor, Meir T. [7 ]
机构
[1] Eberhard Karls Univ Tuebingen, Univ Hosp Tuebingen, BG Hosp, Schnarrenbergstr 95, D-72076 Tubingen, Germany
[2] Inst Hlth, Human Mot Orthopaed Sports Med & Digital Methods G, Transversal Act, Luxembourg, Luxembourg
[3] Kaiser Permanente Downey, Downey Med Ctr, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Southern Calif Permanente Med Grp, Downey, CA USA
[4] Univ Ulm, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Ulm, Germany
[5] ALT Y Orthopaed Hosp, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
[6] Univ Virginia, Charlottesville, VA USA
[7] Univ Calif San Francisco, San Francisco Gen Hosp, Orthopaed Trauma Inst OTI, San Francisco, CA USA
关键词
Survey; Wearable activity monitors; AO Trauma; PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY; ACCELEROMETRY; FRACTURES;
D O I
10.1016/j.injury.2022.03.026
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
The use of wearable sensors to track activity is increasing. Therefore, a survey among AO Trauma members was conducted to provide an overview of their current utilization and determine future needs and directions. A cross sectional expert opinion survey was administered to members of AO Trauma. Respondents were surveyed concerning their experience, subspeciality, current use characteristics, as well as future needs concerning wearable technology. Three hundred and thirty-three survey sets were available for analysis (Response Rate 16.2%). 20.7% of respondents already use wearable technology as part of their clinical treatment. The most prevalent technology was accelerometry combined with smartphones (75.4%) to measure general patient activity. To facilitate the use of wearable technology in the future, the most pressing issues were cost, patient compliance and validity of results. Wearable activity monitors are currently being used in trauma surgery. Surgeons employing these technologies mostly measure simple activity or activity associated parameters. Cost was the greatest perceived barrier to implementation. Further research, especially concerning the interpretation of the outcome values obtained, is required to facilitate wearable activity monitoring as an objective patient outcome measurement tool. (c) 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ )
引用
收藏
页码:1961 / 1965
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Use of Wearable Technology to Measure Activity in Orthopaedic Trauma Patients: A Systematic Review
    Marmor, Meir T.
    Grimm, Bernd
    Hanflik, Andrew M.
    Richter, Peter H.
    Sivananthan, Sureshan
    Yarboro, Seth Robert
    Braun, Benedikt J.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2022, 56 (07) : 1112 - 1122
  • [32] Current imaging technology and trauma: Has the secondary survey been superceded?
    Civil, I. D. S.
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2008, 39 (05): : 505 - 506
  • [33] Chronic pain after surgery and trauma: current situation and future directions
    Lavand'homme, P.
    ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA BELGICA, 2022, 73 (04) : 241 - 247
  • [34] Current status and applications of photovoltaic technology in wearable sensors: a review
    Niranjan, D. B.
    Jacob, Jennifer
    Vaidehi, B. R.
    Peter, Mathew
    Medikonda, Jeevan
    Namboothiri, Pramod K.
    FRONTIERS IN NANOTECHNOLOGY, 2023, 5
  • [35] ORTHOPEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY - REVIEW BY THROMBOEMBOLIC RISK-FACTORS CONSENSUS GROUP WAS MISQUOTED
    LOWE, GDO
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1995, 311 (7000): : 331 - 331
  • [36] Current and future applications of mobile health technology for evaluating spine surgery patients: a review
    Greenberg, Jacob K.
    Javeed, Saad
    Zhang, Justin K.
    Benedict, Braeden
    Frumkin, Madelyn R.
    Xu, Ziqi
    Zhang, Jingwen
    Rodebaugh, Thomas L.
    Lu, Chenyang
    Piccirillo, Jay F.
    Steinmetz, Michael
    Ghogawala, Zoher
    Bydon, Mohamad
    Ray, Wilson Z.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2023, 38 (05) : 617 - 626
  • [37] Three-dimensional Printing in Orthopedic Surgery: Current Applications and Future Developments
    Wixted, Colleen M.
    Peterson, Jonathan R.
    Abar, Bijan
    Adams, Samuel B.
    TECHNIQUES IN ORTHOPAEDICS, 2022, 37 (01) : 2 - 9
  • [38] Preventing confounding in observational studies in orthopedic trauma surgery through expert panels: a systematic review
    Groenwold, Rolf H. H.
    van Rossenberg, L. X.
    Smeeing, D. P. J.
    Houwert, R. M.
    Schoones, J. W.
    Muijs, S. P. J.
    Oner, F. C.
    de Jong, Y.
    van de Wall, B. J. M.
    NEXT Study Grp
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND EMERGENCY SURGERY, 2025, 51 (01)
  • [39] Robotic Technology in Spine Surgery: Current Applications and Future Developments
    Stueer, Carsten
    Ringel, Florian
    Stoffel, Michael
    Reinke, Andreas
    Behr, Michael
    Meyer, Bernhard
    INTRAOPERATIVE IMAGING, 2011, 109 : 241 - 245
  • [40] A Review of "Will Future Surgeons Be Interested in Trauma Care? Results of a Resident Survey" (1992)
    Spain, David A.
    AMERICAN SURGEON, 2021, 87 (02) : 191 - 194