Transapical aortic valve implantation after previous aortic valve replacement: Clinical proof of the "valve-in-valve" concept

被引:63
|
作者
Pasic, Miralem [1 ]
Unbehaun, Axel [1 ]
Dreysse, Stephan [1 ]
Buz, Semih [1 ]
Drews, Thorsten [1 ]
Kukucka, Marian [1 ]
Hetzer, Roland [1 ]
机构
[1] Deutsch Herzzentrum Berlin, D-13353 Berlin, Germany
来源
关键词
HIGH-RISK PATIENTS; COREVALVE; REGURGITATION; STENOSIS; PROSTHESIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.09.049
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: The "valve-in-valve" concept may be applied in patients with previously implanted biological aortic valve prostheses. There are few reports of individual cases and as yet no clinical proof of safety and feasibility in a larger group of patients. We report the single-center outcome of transapical implantation of aortic valves into degenerated biological aortic valve prostheses ("valve-in-valve") in very high-risk patients. Methods: Since October 2008, 14 patients were treated by transapical valve implantation into degenerated biological aortic valve prostheses. Edwards SAPIEN (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, Calif) transcatheter heart valves were used in all patients. Mean (+/- standard deviation) patient age was 73.3 +/- 13.1 years. Mean (+/- standard deviation) Society of Thoracic Surgeons score was 21.9% +/- 10.9% (range, 4.2%-42.2%), and logistic euroSCORE was 45.3% +/- 22.2%. Preoperatively, all patients were in New York Heart Association functional class III or IV. Results: The procedural success was 100%. Preoperative transthoracic echocardiography mean transvalvular gradient was reduced from 37.1 +/- 25.7 mm Hg to 13.1 +/- 6.4 mm Hg, and mean aortic valve area increased from 0.68 +/- 0.23 cm(2) to 1.35 +/- 0.48 cm(2). There was no postoperative valve insufficiency. The postoperative course was short and uneventful in all but 1 patient. One patient underwent reoperation 3 months later because of endocarditis. Up to 20 months postoperatively, the patients were in New York Heart Association functional class I or II. Conclusions: Transapical aortic valve implantation after previous aortic valve replacement was feasible and safe in our patients. The results are excellent with improvements in hemodynamics, but longer follow-up with more patients is needed. (J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2011;142:270-7)
引用
收藏
页码:270 / 277
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Transcatheter, valve-in-valve transapical aortic and mitral valve implantation, in a high risk patient with aortic and mitral prosthetic valve stenoses
    Ramakrishna, Harish
    DeValeria, Patrick A.
    Sweeney, John P.
    Mookaram, Farouk
    ANNALS OF CARDIAC ANAESTHESIA, 2015, 18 (02) : 246 - 251
  • [22] Valve-in-Valve Implantation for Aortic Annular Rupture Complicating Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR)
    Yu, Young
    Vallely, Michael
    Ng, Martin K. C.
    JOURNAL OF INVASIVE CARDIOLOGY, 2013, 25 (08): : 409 - 410
  • [23] Report on outcomes of valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation and redo surgical aortic valve replacement in the Netherlands
    G. J. van Steenbergen
    B. van Straten
    K. Y. Lam
    D. van Veghel
    L. Dekker
    P. A. Tonino
    Netherlands Heart Journal, 2022, 30 : 106 - 112
  • [24] Report on outcomes of valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation and redo surgical aortic valve replacement in the Netherlands
    van Steenbergen, G. J.
    van Straten, B.
    Lam, K. Y.
    van Veghel, D.
    Dekker, L.
    Tonino, P. A.
    NETHERLANDS HEART JOURNAL, 2022, 30 (02) : 106 - 112
  • [25] Reversible Thrombotic Aortic Restenosis after Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
    Goleski, Patrick J.
    Don, Creighton W.
    CARDIOLOGY, 2016, 134 (02) : 301 - 301
  • [26] Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Redo Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement
    Pompeu, Michel
    Van den Eynde, Jef
    Simonato, Matheus
    Pibarot, Philippe
    Clavel, Marie-Annick
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2021, 14 (08) : 926 - 928
  • [27] Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Implantation Versus Redo Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement
    Malik, Aaqib H.
    Yandrapalli, Srikanth
    Zaid, Syed
    Shetty, Suchith S.
    Aronow, Wilbert S.
    Ahmad, Hasan
    Tang, Gilbert H. L.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 125 (09): : 1378 - 1384
  • [28] Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus repeat surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with a failed aortic bioprosthesis
    Majmundar, Monil
    Doshi, Rajkumar
    Kumar, Ashish
    Johnston, Douglas
    Brockett, James
    Kanaa'N, Anmar
    Lahorra, Joseph A.
    Svensson, Lars G.
    Krishnaswamy, Amar
    Reed, Grant W.
    Puri, Rishi
    Kapadia, Samir R.
    Kalra, Ankur
    EUROINTERVENTION, 2022, 17 (15) : 1227 - +
  • [29] Permanent Pacemaker Implantation Following Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
    Alperi, Alberto
    Rodes-Cabau, Josep
    Simonato, Matheus
    Tchetche, Didier
    Charbonnier, Gaetan
    Ribeiro, Henrique B.
    Latib, Azeem
    Montorfano, Matteo
    Barbanti, Marco
    Bleiziffer, Sabine
    Redfors, Bjorn
    Abdel-Wahab, Mohamed
    Allali, Abdelhakim
    Bruschi, Giuseppe
    Napodano, Massimo
    Agrifoglio, Marco
    Petronio, Anna Sonia
    Giannini, Cristina
    Chan, Albert
    Kornowski, Ran
    Pravda, Nili Schamroth
    Adam, Matti
    Iadanza, Alessandro
    Noble, Stephane
    Chatfield, Andrew
    Erlebach, Magdalena
    Kempfert, Joerg
    Ubben, Timm
    Wijeysundera, Harindra
    Seiffert, Moritz
    Pilgrim, Thomas
    Kim, Won-Keun
    Testa, Luca
    Hildick-Smith, David
    Nerla, Roberto
    Fiorina, Claudia
    Brinkmann, Christina
    Conzelmann, Lars
    Champagnac, Didier
    Saia, Francesco
    Nissen, Henrik
    Amrane, Hafid
    Whisenant, Brian
    Shamekhi, Jasmin
    Sondergaard, Lars
    Webb, John G.
    Dvir, Danny
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2021, 77 (18) : 2263 - 2273
  • [30] Failed Valve-In-Valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
    Klotz, Stefan
    Scharfschwerdt, Michael
    Richardt, Doreen
    Sievers, Hans H.
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2012, 5 (05) : 591 - 592