Will Improvements in Patient Experience With Care Impact Clinical and Quality of Care Outcomes? A Systematic Review

被引:19
|
作者
Navarro, Stephanie [1 ]
Ochoa, Carol Y. [1 ]
Chan, Emily [1 ]
Du, Senxi [1 ]
Farias, Albert J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southern Calif, Keck Sch Med, Dept Prevent Med, Los Angeles, CA 90007 USA
关键词
patient experiences; Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems; quality improvement; HEALTH-CARE; HOSPITAL QUALITY; COMMUNICATION; ASSOCIATIONS; NONRESPONSE; RATINGS; CAHPS; ADHERENCE; DIFFER; PLANS;
D O I
10.1097/MLR.0000000000001598
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Patient experiences with health care have been widely used as benchmark indicators of quality for providers, health care practices, and health plans. Objective: The objective of this study was to summarize the literature regarding the associations between Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) patient experiences and clinical and quality outcomes. Research Design: A systematic review of the literature was completed using PubMed, Embase, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature on December 14, 2019. Separate searches were conducted to query terms identifying CAHPS surveys with clinical and quality outcomes of care. Two reviewers completed all components of the search process. Study Selection: Studies investigating associations between CAHPS composite ratings and health care sensitive clinical outcomes or quality measures of care were included in this review. Studies were excluded if they did not investigate patient experiences using CAHPS composite ratings or if CAHPS composites were not treated as the independent variable. Results: Nineteen studies met inclusion criteria, 10 investigating associations of CAHPS composite ratings with clinical outcomes and 9 investigating these associations with quality measures. Patient-provider communication was the most studied CAHPS composite rating and was significantly associated with self-reported physical and mental health, frequency of emergency room visits and inpatient hospital stays, hospitalization length, and CAHPS personal physician global ratings. Conclusions: Ratings of patient experience with care may influence clinical and quality outcomes of care. However, key inconsistencies between studies affirm that more research is needed to solidify this conclusion and investigate how patient experiences differentially relate to outcomes for various patient groups.
引用
收藏
页码:843 / 856
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Effects of shift length on quality of patient care and health provider outcomes: systematic review
    Estabrooks, C. A.
    Cummings, G. G.
    Olivo, S. A.
    Squires, J. E.
    Giblin, C.
    Simpson, N.
    QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE, 2009, 18 (03): : 181 - 188
  • [22] A systematic review of vertical integration and quality of care, efficiency, and patient-centered outcomes
    Machta, Rachel M.
    Maurer, Kristin A.
    Jones, David J.
    Furukawa, Michael F.
    Rich, Eugene C.
    HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2019, 44 (02) : 159 - 173
  • [23] Doula Care: A Review of Outcomes and Impact on Birth Experience
    Ramey-Collier, Khaila
    Jackson, Maya
    Malloy, Angela
    McMillan, Cindy
    Scraders-Pyatt, Andora
    Wheeler, Sarahn M.
    OBSTETRICAL & GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY, 2023, 78 (02) : 124 - 127
  • [24] IMPACT OF LOSS OF INTERPERSONAL CONTINUITY ON PATIENT EXPERIENCE OF CARE AND AMBULATORY QUALITY OF CARE
    Reddy, Ashok
    Asch, David A.
    Canamucio, Anne
    Werner, Rachel M.
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2014, 29 : S120 - S121
  • [25] Impact of Prehospital Care on Outcomes in Sepsis: A Systematic Review
    Smyth, Michael A.
    Brace-McDonnell, Samantha J.
    Perkins, Gavin D.
    WESTERN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2016, 17 (02) : 427 - 437
  • [26] Speak Up for Patient Care Quality Improvements Through Peer Review
    Brim, Carla
    CLINICAL NURSE SPECIALIST, 2010, 24 (02) : 101 - 102
  • [27] The impact of machine learning on patient care: A systematic review
    Ben-Israel, David
    Jacobs, W. Bradley
    Casha, Steve
    Lang, Stefan
    Ryu, Won Hyung A.
    de Lotbiniere-Bassett, Madeleine
    Cadotte, David W.
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN MEDICINE, 2020, 103 (103)
  • [28] A review of clinical experience and recommendations for improving patient care
    Weiss, J
    CUTIS, 2005, 75 (02): : 32 - 39
  • [29] Impact of GP gatekeeping on quality of care, and health outcomes, use, and expenditure: a systematic review
    Sripa, Poompong
    Hayhoe, Benedict
    Garg, Priya
    Majeed, Azeem
    Greenfield, Geva
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2019, 69 (682): : E294 - E303
  • [30] Impact of High Deductible Health Plans on Diabetes Care Quality and Outcomes: Systematic Review
    Jiang, David H.
    Mundell, Benjamin F.
    Shah, Nilay D.
    McCoy, Rozalina G.
    ENDOCRINE PRACTICE, 2021, 27 (11) : 1156 - 1164