FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF FOREST VILLAGE COOPERATIVES: A MULTI-CRITERIA TOPSIS APPROACH

被引:4
|
作者
Korkmaz, Mehmet [1 ]
Gurer, Demet [2 ]
机构
[1] Suleyman Demirel Univ, Isparta, Turkey
[2] Gen Directorate Forestry, Ankara, Turkey
关键词
Forest Village; Financial ranking; Cooperatives; TOPSIS; Rural development; PARTICIPATION; MEMBERSHIP; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1590/01047760201824032532
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
Forest villagers constitute the poorest of the society in underdeveloped and developing countries. Efforts for the rural development of forest villages are important for combating poverty, regulating the relationship with forest villagers, and ensuring sustainable management of forests, since rural people subsist on forest lands. As the most important method of executing an organized movement in such settlement areas, cooperatives represent one of the most crucial actors in rural development. However, it seems that cooperatives cannot provide adequate contribution to the rural development in Turkey. This research analyses the financial performance of the cooperatives operating in the forest villages located within the boundaries of Bucak and Sutculer forest districts, where forestry activities are carried out intensively in Turkey. This study uses the TOPSIS method, which is a multi-criteria decision-making method. The results of the study revealed that the financial performances of all of the cooperatives were low during the years when they were analysed. The most important reasons for low financial performance include the fact that: (i) the cooperatives mainly operated in the field of wood production and the business volume in that field was inadequate, (ii) their capital was insufficient since the members assumed a lower share, (iii) they had challenges accessing constant funds for investment, (iv) the state subsidies decreased, (v) the number of members was low, and (vi) they were unable to compete with large companies.
引用
收藏
页码:280 / 287
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Desalination technology selection using multi-criteria evaluation: TOPSIS and PROMETHEE-2
    Vivekh, P.
    Sudhakar, M.
    Srinivas, M.
    Vishwanthkumar, V.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LOW-CARBON TECHNOLOGIES, 2017, 12 (01) : 24 - 35
  • [32] Application of fuzzy multi-criteria decision making methods for financial performance evaluation of Turkish manufacturing industries
    Yalcin, Nese
    Bayrakdaroglu, Ali
    Kahraman, Cengiz
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2012, 39 (01) : 350 - 364
  • [34] Number of Financial Indicators as a Factor of Multi-Criteria Analysis via the TOPSIS Technique: A Municipal Case Study
    Vavrek, Roman
    Becica, Jiri
    Papcunova, Viera
    Gundova, Petra
    Mitrikova, Jana
    ALGORITHMS, 2021, 14 (02)
  • [35] An Approach to Multi-criteria Environmental Evaluation with Multiple Weight Assignment
    Agarski, Boris
    Budak, Igor
    Kosec, Borut
    Hodolic, Janko
    ENVIRONMENTAL MODELING & ASSESSMENT, 2012, 17 (03) : 255 - 266
  • [36] MULTI-CRITERIA APPROACH TO POLICY EVALUATION FOR COMMUNITY-DEVELOPMENT
    AWERBUCH, S
    WALLACE, WA
    OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 1975, 23 : B391 - B391
  • [37] Competitiveness analysis and evaluation of entrepreneurial ecosystems: a multi-criteria approach
    Ioannis Sitaridis
    Fotis Kitsios
    Annals of Operations Research, 2020, 294 : 377 - 399
  • [38] Competitiveness analysis and evaluation of entrepreneurial ecosystems: a multi-criteria approach
    Sitaridis, Ioannis
    Kitsios, Fotis
    ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2020, 294 (1-2) : 377 - 399
  • [39] Generative design process: multi-criteria evaluation and multidisciplinary approach
    Baratta, Adolfo F. L.
    Finucci, Fabrizio
    Mogaro, Antonio
    TECHNE-JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY FOR ARCHITECTURE AND ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 21 : 304 - 314
  • [40] Evaluation of Renewable Energy Projects Using Multi-Criteria Approach
    Malik, Arif
    Al Badi, Mohammed
    Al Kahali, Abdullah
    Al Nabhani, Younis
    Al Bahri, Alwarith
    Al Barhi, Hamed
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE FOURTH IEEE GLOBAL HUMANITARIAN TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE (GHTC 2014), 2014, : 350 - 355