Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward

被引:121
|
作者
Boyer, Robert H. W. [1 ]
Peterson, Nicole D. [2 ]
Arora, Poonam [3 ]
Caldwell, Kevin [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Dept Geog & Earth Sci, McEniry 324,9201 Univ City Blvd, Charlotte, NC 28223 USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Dept Anthropol, Barnard 217,9201 Univ City Blvd, Charlotte, NC 28223 USA
[3] Manhattan Coll, Dept Management & Mkt, Sch Business, 518 De LaSalle,4513 Manhattan Coll Pkwy, Riverdale, NY 10471 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
social sustainability; three-pillar model; sustainable development; interdisciplinary; DECISION-MAKING; LOCAL KNOWLEDGE; PARTICIPATION; AFFILIATION; TRANSITIONS; POLITICS; CITIES;
D O I
10.3390/su8090878
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Sustainability is often conceived of as an attempt to balance competing economic, environmental and social priorities. Over the course of three decades of scholarship, however, the meaning and appropriate application of the social pillar' continues to inspire confusion. In this paper, we posit that the inherent challenge of understanding social sustainability is its many legitimate meanings plus a lack of interdisciplinary scholarship. We draw from literature in multiple disciplines to illustrate five different ways that the concept of social sustainability has been applied in scholarship and professional practice, and highlighting the importance of applications that acknowledge placed-based, process-oriented perspectives that understand social, economic, and environmental imperatives as integrated concepts. Ironically, this framing forecloses on social sustainability as an entity distinct from environmental and economic sustainability. We believe that organizing the conversation around these five applications can help advocates of sustainability use the concept of social sustainability in clear and powerful ways while avoiding applications that relegate the social dimensions of sustainability to an afterthought.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The Way Forward in Mindfulness and Sustainability: a Critical Review and Research Agenda
    Thiermann, Ute B.
    Sheate, William R.
    JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE ENHANCEMENT, 2021, 5 (01) : 118 - 139
  • [32] An alternative model for measuring the sustainability of urban regeneration: the way forward
    Peng, Yi
    Lai, Yani
    Li, Xuewen
    Zhang, Xiaoling
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2015, 109 : 76 - 83
  • [33] Is sustainability reporting a way forward? Evidence from banking industry
    Gupta, Mayank
    MEDITARI ACCOUNTANCY RESEARCH, 2025, 33 (01) : 53 - 85
  • [34] Mapping the Way Forward: Education for Sustainability in Architecture and Urban Design
    Altomonte, Sergio
    Rutherford, Peter
    Wilson, Robin
    CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2014, 21 (03) : 143 - 154
  • [35] Integrated approaches to mitigate threats from emerging potentially toxic elements: A way forward for sustainable environmental management
    Singh, Anuradha
    Chauhan, Shraddha
    Varjani, Sunita
    Pandey, Ashok
    Bhargava, Preeti Chaturvedi
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2022, 209
  • [36] Social Justice in Nursing Education: A Way Forward
    Roy, Kaveri
    Hunt, Karen
    Sakai, Kanayo
    Fletcher, Kyle
    JOURNAL OF NURSING EDUCATION, 2022, 61 (08) : 447 - 454
  • [37] Promoting Health on Social Media: The Way Forward
    Abroms, Lorien C.
    Gold, Robert S.
    Allegrante, John P.
    HEALTH EDUCATION & BEHAVIOR, 2019, 46 (2_SUPPL) : 9 - 11
  • [38] Social emergency medicine: A way forward for training
    Tam, Vivian
    Targonsky, Elisha
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2020, 22 (04) : 450 - 453
  • [39] Five years' experience of the new SAPs: overview and way forward
    Pape, RP
    NUCLEAR ENERGY-JOURNAL OF THE BRITISH NUCLEAR ENERGY SOCIETY, 1998, 37 (01): : 39 - 42
  • [40] Race, Social Class, and CKD: The Way Forward
    Bruce, Marino A.
    Norris, Keith C.
    KIDNEY MEDICINE, 2022, 4 (01)