Propensity score matching - An illustrative analysis of dose response

被引:105
|
作者
Foster, EM [1 ]
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, Dept Hlth Policy & Adm, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
关键词
econometrics; mental health; children's health; propensity score; dose; dose response; mental health services;
D O I
10.1097/01.MLR.0000089629.62884.22
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND. Health services researchers are often interested in the effect of a treatment or a service in situations in which randomization is difficult or impossible. One useful alternative involves propensity score methods, a means for matching members of different groups based on a range of characteristics. Under certain assumptions, comparisons of the matched groups reveal the impact of the treatment of interest. OBJECTIVES. This article reviews propensity score methods and illustrates their use in an analysis of dose response, the relationship between the volume of services receive, an treatment outcomes. In mental health policy, this question is central to key issues such as parity. RESEARCH DESIGN. Data for the illustrative analysis are taken from a well-known study of children's mental health services. This analysis estimates the impact of outpatient therapy based on comparisons of individuals receiving different treatment doses. Those comparisons are adjusted for preexisting observed differences among the groups using propensity score methods. SUBJECTS. The study includes 301 participants aged 5 to 18 years treated at the study sites. MEASURES. The analyses are based on family characteristics and the mental health status of children and adolescents reported in interviews with parents as well as administrative data on service use. RESULTS. Analyses using propensity score matching suggest that added services improve treatment outcomes, especially child functioning. However, at least for the services and outcomes considered, the marginal benefits to high levels of treatment are limited. CONCLUSIONS. These analyses illustrate the potential value of propensity score methods to health services researchers.
引用
收藏
页码:1183 / 1192
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Propensity score matching and complex surveys
    Austin, Peter C.
    Jembere, Nathaniel
    Chiu, Maria
    STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2018, 27 (04) : 1240 - 1257
  • [32] Caliper considerations for propensity score matching
    Garry, Elizabeth M.
    Eddings, Wesley
    Rajan, Aditya
    Patrick, Amanda R.
    Gatto, Nicolle M.
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2020, 29 : 375 - 376
  • [33] Propensity Score Matching A Statistical Method
    Kane, Liam T.
    Fang, Taolin
    Galetta, Matthew S.
    Goyal, Dhruv K. C.
    Nicholson, Kristen J.
    Kepler, Christopher K.
    Vaccaro, Alexander R.
    Schroeder, Gregory D.
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2020, 33 (03): : 120 - 122
  • [34] Propensity Score Matching with Limited Overlap
    Baser, Onur
    ECONOMICS BULLETIN, 2007, 9
  • [35] Propensity score matching with limited overlap
    Baser, O
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2006, 9 (03) : A115 - A115
  • [36] To use or not to use propensity score matching?
    Wang, Jixian
    PHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 2021, 20 (01) : 15 - 24
  • [37] Propensity Score Matching in Observational Research
    Schober, Patrick
    Vetter, Thomas R.
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2020, 130 (06): : 1616 - 1617
  • [38] Propensity Score Matching: Retrospective Randomization?
    Jupiter, Daniel C.
    JOURNAL OF FOOT & ANKLE SURGERY, 2017, 56 (02): : 417 - 420
  • [39] Matching on the Disease Risk Score vs the Propensity Score
    Wyss, Richard
    Connolly, John
    Gagne, Joshua J.
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2016, 25 : 145 - 146
  • [40] Propensity Score Matching in Accounting Research
    Shipman, Jonathan E.
    Swanquist, Quinn T.
    Whited, Robert L.
    ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2017, 92 (01): : 213 - 244