Does the Access Angle Change the Risk of Approach-Related Complications in Minimally Invasive Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion? An MRI Study

被引:4
|
作者
Huang, Chunneng [1 ]
Xu, Zhengkuan [1 ]
Li, Fangcai [1 ]
Chen, Qixin [1 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Affiliated Hosp 2, Sch Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, 88 Jiefang Rd, Hangzhou 310009, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion; Access angle; Access corridor; Approach-related complications; Magnetic resonance images; TRANSPSOAS APPROACH; SUBSIDENCE; RESPECT; PLEXUS; INJURY; L4-L5;
D O I
10.3340/jkns.2017.0296
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective : To investigate the potential risk of approach-related complications at different access angles in minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion. Methods : Eighty-six axial magnetic resonance images were obtained to analyze the risk of approach-related complications. The access corridor were simulated at different access angles and the potential risk of neurovascular structure injury was evaluated when the access corridor touching or overlapping the corresponding structures at each angle. Furthermore, the safe corridor length was measured when the corridor width was 18 and 22 mm. Results : When access angle was 0 degrees, the potential risk of ipsilateral nerve roots injury was 54.7% at L4-L5. When access angle was 45 degrees, the potential risk of abdominal aorta, contralateral nerve roots or central canal injury at L4-L5 was 79.1%, 74.4%, and 30.2%, respectively. The length of the 18 mm-wide access corridor was largest at 0 degrees and it could reach 44.5 mm at L3-L4 and 46.4 mm at L4-L5. While the length of the 22 mm-wide access corridor was 42.3 mm at L3-L4 and 44.1 mm at L4-L5 at 0 degrees. Conclusion : Changes in the access angle would not only affect the ipsilateral neurovascular structures, but also might adversely influence the contralateral neural elements. It should be also noted to surgeons that alteration of the access angle changed the corridor length.
引用
收藏
页码:707 / 715
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative diseases: a retrospective observational study
    Hao Chen
    Goudi Zheng
    Zhenyu Bian
    Changju Hou
    Maoqiang Li
    Zhen Zhang
    Liulong Zhu
    Xuepeng Wang
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 18
  • [42] Risk Factors for Pseudarthrosis in Minimally-Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Emami, Arash
    Faloon, Michael
    Sahai, Nikhil
    Dunn, Conor J.
    Issa, Kimona
    Thibaudeau, Daniel
    Sinha, Kumar
    Hwang, Ki Soo
    ASIAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2018, 12 (05) : 830 - 838
  • [43] Diabetes Does Not Increase Complications, Length of Stay, or Hospital Costs After Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Narain, Ankur S.
    Haws, Brittany E.
    Jenkins, Nathaniel W.
    Parrish, James M.
    Block, Andrew M.
    Lamoutte, Eric H.
    Karmarkar, Sailee S.
    Singh, Kern
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2020, 33 (07): : E307 - E311
  • [44] Does Gender Influence Postoperative Outcomes in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion?
    Khechen, Benjamin
    Haws, Brittany E.
    Patel, Dil, V
    Cardinal, Kaitlyn L.
    Ganda, Jordan A.
    Singh, Kern
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2019, 32 (02): : E107 - E111
  • [45] Screw Stimulation Thresholds for Neuromonitoring in Minimally Invasive Oblique Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion (OLLIF): A Correlational Study
    Abbasi, Hamid
    Moore, Dominic J.
    Rajaeirad, Mohadese
    Zhan, Jiawen
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (06)
  • [46] Full-Endoscopic Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Via an Interlaminar Approach Versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Preliminary Retrospective Study
    Li, Yawei
    Dai, Yuliang
    Wang, Bing
    Li, Lei
    Li, Pengzhi
    Xu, Jietao
    Jiang, Bin
    Lu, Guohua
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2020, 144 : E475 - E482
  • [47] Novel Titanium Cages for Minimally Invasive Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: First Assessment of Subsidence
    Krafft, Paul R.
    Osburn, Brooks
    Vivas, Andrew C.
    Rao, Gautam
    Alikhani, Puya
    SPINE SURGERY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2020, 4 (02): : 171 - 177
  • [48] Stand-alone minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion: Multicenter clinical outcomes
    Ahmadian, Arnir
    Bach, Konrad
    Bolinger, Bryan
    Malham, Gregory M.
    Okonkwo, David O.
    Kanter, Adam S.
    Uribe, Juan S.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2015, 22 (04) : 740 - 746
  • [49] Numerical simulation of lateral and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion, two minimally invasive surgical approaches
    Areias, B.
    Caetano, S. C.
    Sousa, L. C.
    Parente, M.
    Jorge, R. N.
    Sousa, H.
    Goncalves, J. M.
    COMPUTER METHODS IN BIOMECHANICS AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2020, 23 (08) : 408 - 421
  • [50] The role of minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion in sagittal balance correction and spinal deformity
    Costanzo, Giuseppe
    Zoccali, Carmine
    Maykowski, Philip
    Walter, Christina M.
    Skoch, Jesse
    Baaj, Ali A.
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2014, 23 (06) : S699 - S704