Measuring Teacher Effectiveness Using Value-Added Models of High School Achievement

被引:0
|
作者
Gawade, Nandita G. [1 ]
Meyer, Robert H. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin Madison, Wisconsin Ctr Educ Res, Value Added Res Ctr, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin Madison, Madison, WI USA
[3] Univ Wisconsin Madison, Value Added Res Ctr, Madison, WI USA
来源
TEACHERS COLLEGE RECORD | 2016年 / 118卷 / 13期
关键词
STUDENT-ACHIEVEMENT;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This article uses empirical data to consider the consequences of particular characteristics of instruction and testing in high school for the modeling and estimation of value-added measures of school or teacher effectiveness. Unlike Mathematics and Reading for most elementary and middle school grades, there is a lack of annual testing of students in all secondary grades and subjects. The development of value-added models in high school is complicated by the resulting unavailability of direct measures of prior knowledge and readiness of the student for the relevant course. Another distinction between high school and earlier grades is the presence of greater differentiated instruction in high school caused by supplemental course requirements or by student self-selection into different courses. We show that the traditional value-added model used in NCLB grades and subjects can be generalized to the high school context. Specifically, prior-year test scores in related or core subjects can be used to control for differences in student aptitude for the course or subject being evaluated. Similarly, we can account for relevant differences in classroom characteristics-such as the average prior achievement of the students in the classroom-if they are assumed to be beyond a teacher's control.
引用
收藏
页数:32
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] ASSUMPTIONS OF VALUE-ADDED MODELS FOR ESTIMATING SCHOOL EFFECTS
    Reardon, Sean F.
    Raudenbush, Stephen W.
    EDUCATION FINANCE AND POLICY, 2009, 4 (04) : 492 - 519
  • [22] Value-Added Models for Teacher Evaluation and Accountability: Commonsense Assumptions
    Amrein-Beardsley, Audrey
    Holloway, Jessica
    EDUCATIONAL POLICY, 2019, 33 (03) : 516 - 542
  • [23] Assessing Rothstein's critique of teacher value-added models
    Kinsler, Josh
    QUANTITATIVE ECONOMICS, 2012, 3 (02) : 333 - 362
  • [24] The sensitivity of value-added teacher effect estimates to different mathematics achievement measures
    Lockwood, J. R.
    McCaffrey, Daniel F.
    Hamilton, Laura S.
    Stecher, Brian
    Le, Vi-Nhuan
    Martinez, Jose Felipe
    JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT, 2007, 44 (01) : 47 - 67
  • [25] The Implications of Summer Learning Loss for Value-Added Estimates of Teacher Effectiveness
    Gershenson, Seth
    Hayes, Michael S.
    EDUCATIONAL POLICY, 2018, 32 (01) : 55 - 85
  • [26] DOES STUDENT SORTING INVALIDATE VALUE-ADDED MODELS OF TEACHER EFFECTIVENESS? AN EXTENDED ANALYSIS OF THE ROTHSTEIN CRITIQUE
    Koedel, Cory
    Betts, Julian R.
    EDUCATION FINANCE AND POLICY, 2011, 6 (01) : 18 - 42
  • [27] Methods for Incorporating Measurement Error in Value-Added Models and Teacher Classifications
    Doran, Harold C.
    STATISTICS AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2014, 1 (01): : 114 - 119
  • [28] A Comparison of Student Growth Percentile and Value-Added Models of Teacher Performance
    Guarino, Cassandra
    Reckase, Mark
    Stacy, Brian
    Wooldridge, Jeffrey
    STATISTICS AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2015, 2 (01): : 66 - 76
  • [29] Measuring the Impacts of Teachers I: Evaluating Bias in Teacher Value-Added Estimates
    Chetty, Raj
    Friedman, John N.
    Rockoff, Jonah E.
    AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2014, 104 (09): : 2593 - 2632
  • [30] A Reanalysis of the Effects of Teacher Replacement Using Value-Added Modeling
    Yeh, Stuart S.
    TEACHERS COLLEGE RECORD, 2013, 115 (12):