A review and simulation of business angel investment returns

被引:14
|
作者
Gregson, Geoff [1 ]
Bock, Adam J. [2 ]
Harrison, Richard T. [3 ]
机构
[1] Northern Alberta Inst Technol, JR Shaw Sch Business, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[2] Univ Wisconsin Madison, Wisconsin Sch Business, Madison, WI USA
[3] Univ Edinburgh, Sch Business, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
关键词
Business angels; investment returns; portfolio size; policy implications; PRIVATE EQUITY RETURNS; VENTURE CAPITALISTS; FINANCE ESCALATOR; FUND INFLOWS; INVESTORS; RISK; FIRMS; MARKET; SYNDICATION; COMMITMENT;
D O I
10.1080/13691066.2017.1332546
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Business angels are widely recognized as a significant source of entrepreneurial finance, particularly for early-stage businesses. However, rigorous investigation on angel investment performance has been limited. This paper examines investment returns of business angels in addressing the question of whether angel investing generates attractive returns. We review the few published studies which report on more than 100 investment exits to establish baseline returns expectations and clarify returns measurement limitations. We then use data from one of the largest studies of angel returns to populate a Monte Carlo simulation of returns profiles to explore the link between portfolio size and the probability of the desired level of returns. The study reveals that angel deal returns are highly skewed; smaller portfolios have higher average returns but dramatically lower median returns. In contrast with prior studies, our study shows that portfolios with more than 50 investments are required to significantly minimize risk of poor returns and that similar scale is required to maximize returns potential, as smaller portfolios have a lower average internal rate of return (IRR). We show that reinvestment rate is a critical element in measuring angel returns, and we demonstrate the limitations of IRR as a returns metric through the simulation.
引用
收藏
页码:285 / 311
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Big Returns on Investment
    Kanetsky, Peter A.
    CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2019, 28 (07) : 1271 - 1272
  • [32] Do business cycles, investment-specific technology shocks matter for stock returns?
    Prabheesh, K. P.
    Vidya, C. T.
    ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2018, 70 : 511 - 524
  • [33] Simulation in manufacturing and business: A review
    Jahangirian, Mohsen
    Eldabi, Tillal
    Naseer, Aisha
    Stergioulas, Lampros K.
    Young, Terry
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2010, 203 (01) : 1 - 13
  • [34] ON STOCK-MARKET RETURNS AND RETURNS ON INVESTMENT
    RESTOY, F
    ROCKINGER, GM
    JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1994, 49 (02): : 543 - 556
  • [35] Perceived Market Risk in New Ventures: A Study of Early-Phase Business Angel Investment Screening
    Frias, Kellilynn M.
    Popovich, Deidre L.
    Duhan, Dale F.
    Lusch, Robert F.
    JOURNAL OF MACROMARKETING, 2020, 40 (03) : 339 - 354
  • [36] Gender stereotypes in the angel investment process
    Edelman, Linda F.
    Donnelly, Roisin
    Manolova, Tatiana
    Brush, Candida G.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GENDER AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP, 2018, 10 (02) : 134 - 157
  • [37] Stochastic simulation using @Risk for dairy business investment decisions
    Bewley, J. M.
    Boehlje, M. D.
    Gray, A. W.
    Hogeveen, H.
    Kenyon, S. J.
    Eicher, S. D.
    Schutz, M. M.
    AGRICULTURAL FINANCE REVIEW, 2010, 70 (01) : 97 - +
  • [38] Executive Forum: Public Support for the Business Angel Market in Europe - a Critical Review
    Aernoudt, Rudy
    San Jose, Amparo
    Roure, Juan
    VENTURE CAPITAL, 2007, 9 (01) : 71 - 84
  • [39] INFLATION, TAXATION AND INVESTMENT RETURNS
    CROSS, SM
    JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1980, 35 (01): : 177 - 180
  • [40] The Returns to Public Library Investment
    Gilpin, Gregory
    Karger, Ezra
    Nencka, Peter
    AMERICAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL-ECONOMIC POLICY, 2024, 16 (02) : 78 - 109