Critical Success Factors for Information Systems Development: A Case Study in e-Government

被引:3
|
作者
Guntur, Muhamad [1 ]
Purwandari, Betty [1 ]
Raharjo, Teguh [1 ]
Solichah, Iis [1 ]
Kumaralalita, Larastri [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Indonesia, Fac Comp Sci, Depok, Indonesia
关键词
Information Systems Development; Critical Success Factors; Analytic Hierarchy Process; e-Government; PROJECTS; AGILE; MODEL;
D O I
10.1145/3278252.3278288
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Information Systems (IS) development for government is prone to failure, which also happened to the development of Administration and Credit Information Systems (Sistem Informasi Pengadministrasian dan Angka Kredit or SIPARKIT) by the ICT unit at Finance Education and Training Agency (BPPK), Ministry of Finance, Republic of Indonesia. This study investigates the Critical Success Factors (CSF) of the SIPARKIT to determine the priority of each CSF. These factors were identified from the literature and interviewed with SIPARKIT development team and experts in IS project management. The CSFs were then ranked using pair wise comparison questionnaire by the IS development team and high rank ICT officers. The data collected from the questionnaires were analyzed using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). The results show that business process reengineering and system integration are the most important factor for the success of IS development. Other CSFs are project plan and schedule, team skills, competencies, and composition, top management support, and politics within the organization, communication, leadership, performance assessment, and knowledge management. Interviews with top management were also conducted to support the analysis results.
引用
收藏
页码:29 / 33
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The role of awareness in appraising the success of E-government systems
    Hidayat Ur Rehman, Imdadullah
    Ali Turi, Jamshid
    Rosak-Szyrocka, Joanna
    Alam, Mohammad Nurul
    Pilar, Ladislav
    COGENT BUSINESS & MANAGEMENT, 2023, 10 (01):
  • [42] Validating IS Success Factors: An Empirical Study on Web-based State or Local E-government Systems
    Song, Changsoo
    AMCIS 2010 PROCEEDINGS, 2010,
  • [43] Information security evaluation of e-government systems
    Cheng, Xiaorong
    Li, Mei
    Zhao, Huilan
    DCABES 2007 Proceedings, Vols I and II, 2007, : 532 - 535
  • [44] INVESTIGATION OF E-GOVERNMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS AGILITY
    Soumia, Aggoune
    Rabah, Imache
    Mohamed, Mezghiche
    Abdelaziz, Khadraoui
    KMIS 2010: PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT AND INFORMATION SHARING, 2010, : 311 - +
  • [45] Acceptance Factors and User Design of Mobile e-Government Website (Study Case e-Government Website in Indonesia)
    Cahyono, Taufiq Agung
    Susanto, Tony Dwi
    FIFTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE, 2019, 161 : 90 - 98
  • [46] A Case Study Analysis of Factors Determining Success or Failure for Participants in Collaborative Innovation Projects in e-Government
    Keefe, Terry
    Bikfalvi, Andrea
    Beer, Martin
    Lluis De la Rosa, Josep
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 13TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON EGOVERNMENT, 2013, : 276 - 282
  • [47] Influential Factors for E-Government Success in the Middle East: Case Study Evidence from Saudi Arabia
    Franke, Roland
    Kroenung, Julia
    Born, Friedrich
    Eckhardt, Andreas
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRONIC GOVERNMENT RESEARCH, 2015, 11 (01) : 39 - 62
  • [48] Theorizing Information Security Success: Towards Secure E-Government
    Dukerley, Kimberley
    Tejay, Gurvirender
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRONIC GOVERNMENT RESEARCH, 2010, 6 (03) : 31 - 41
  • [49] User engagement in e-government systems implementation: A comparative case study of two Singaporean e-government initiatives
    Chan, Calvin M. L.
    Pan, Shan L.
    JOURNAL OF STRATEGIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2008, 17 (02): : 124 - 139
  • [50] Analysis of success factors in e-government transformation in Turkey: are these factors really the causes of success?
    Iskender, Gokhan
    Ozkan, Sevgi
    INFORMATION DEVELOPMENT, 2015, 31 (04) : 323 - 332