Tackling the energy efficiency gap in the Irish residential sector

被引:3
|
作者
O'Callaghan, Andrew [1 ]
Purcell, Karl [1 ]
Hemmingway, Phil [2 ]
机构
[1] Sustainable Energy Author Ireland, Behav Econ Unit, Dublin, Ireland
[2] Sustainable Energy Author Ireland, Low Carbon Technol, Dublin, Ireland
关键词
climate change; energy; public policy; DISCOUNT RATES; CARBON TAX; PREFERENCES; DECISION; IMPACT; TRUST;
D O I
10.1680/jener.19.00043
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The residential sector holds significant potential for improvements in energy efficiency in Ireland. Retrofit activity, however, can be difficult to instigate despite the presence of government incentives and cost-effective investment opportunities. The failure of individuals and organisations to invest in cost-effective energy efficiency measures is often referred to as 'the energy efficiency gap'. Here, two separate, but not mutually exclusive, potential contributing factors for this phenomenon are discussed in detail: behavioural anomalies and modelling miscalculations. The relevance of these factors in the context of the Irish residential sector is introduced, and this is followed by a review of intervention literature seeking to increase energy efficiency programme adoption rates by addressing behavioural failures. An examination of domestic and international evidence shows a consistent overestimation by ex-ante models of energy-saving benefits. The paper concludes that addressing behavioural and informational factors can have a positive influence on energy efficiency adoption, but this needs to be complemented with additional policy measures to sufficiently rectify current low rates of uptake in the Irish residential sector. Simultaneously, further action will be needed to better calibrate engineering models using data gathered from ex-post field experiments.
引用
收藏
页码:49 / 59
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Unintended Effects of Energy Efficiency Policy: Lessons Learned in the Residential Sector
    Blumberga, Andra
    Bazbauers, Gatis
    Vancane, Selina
    Ijabs, Ivars
    Nikisins, Jurijs
    Blumberga, Dagnija
    ENERGIES, 2021, 14 (22)
  • [22] Energy Saving, Energy Efficiency or Renewable Energy: Which Is Better for the Decarbonization of the Residential Sector in Italy?
    Noro, Marco
    Busato, Filippo
    ENERGIES, 2023, 16 (08)
  • [23] Asymmetric information in residential rental markets: Implications for the energy efficiency gap
    Myers, Erica
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2020, 190
  • [24] Understanding the residential energy efficiency financing coverage gap and market potential
    Forrester, Sydney P.
    Reames, Tony G.
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2020, 260
  • [25] Energy efficiency gap and the limits to the effectiveness of non-price interventions: making the case for residential energy efficiency
    Srinivasan, Sunderasan
    ENERGY EFFICIENCY, 2025, 18 (04)
  • [26] Modelling the deployment of energy efficiency measures for the residential sector. The case of Italy
    Bianco, Vincenzo
    Marmori, Clara
    SUSTAINABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES AND ASSESSMENTS, 2022, 49
  • [27] Exploring the cost-effectiveness of energy efficiency implementation measures in the residential sector
    Belaid, Fateh
    Ranjbar, Zeinab
    Massie, Camille
    ENERGY POLICY, 2021, 150
  • [28] Measurement Data Analysis of Power Quality and Energy Efficiency for Residential Loads Sector
    Andrei, H.
    Marin, Oana
    Ghita, M. R.
    Ivanovici, T.
    Nicolaescu, Gh.
    Nastase, L.
    Andrei, P. C.
    2012 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON POWER AND ENERGY SYSTEMS (ICPES 2012), 2012, 13 : 56 - 63
  • [29] Energy development in Nigeria and the need for strategic energy efficiency practice scheme for the residential building sector
    Hussaini, Ibrahim Udale
    Majid, Noor Hanita Abdul
    MANAGEMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2015, 26 (01) : 21 - 36
  • [30] Impact of energy policy instruments on the estimated level of underlying energy efficiency in the EU residential sector
    Filippini, Massimo
    Hunt, Lester C.
    Zoric, Jelena
    ENERGY POLICY, 2014, 69 : 73 - 81