Evidence-based health care: development and audit of a clinical standard for research and its impact on an NHS trust

被引:11
|
作者
Parkin, C
Bullock, I
机构
[1] Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Trust, Nursing Res Unit, London, England
[2] Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Trust, Dept Educ, London, England
关键词
research; clinical standard; dynamic quality improvement; survey;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2702.2004.01080.x
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Background. Working within a modern National Health Service in the United Kingdom, the place for research and its dissemination is increasingly important. The organization of this within each National Health Service (NHS) Trust is challenging but nevertheless essential. If health care professionals are to be empowered to adopt an evidence-based approach in both the planning and delivery of care, research aware employees are crucial. Aims and objectives. This paper highlights the importance of NHS hospital trusts implementing initiatives that will facilitate this process. One such initiative has been the development and survey of a clinical standard for research. The primary development aim was to provide a benchmark standard for all nursing research. The standard was developed to fit within the current dynamic quality improvement (DQI) programme and has directly contributed to an evolving culture of research by shaping nurses' awareness, and offering a support and consultancy network within the Trust. The standard is one aspect of a research awareness programme, with the primary objective of providing guidance and education whilst developing nurses throughout the research process. The planned strategic outcome is to see a positive outcome on the quality of research in the Trust. Design. A baseline survey was conducted to provide a definitive snap shot of research understanding and practice within the Trust following the introduction of the research standard. Methods. The standard was developed by a team of clinicians led by a member of the quality team, to ensure that it fitted the DQI structure, and a member of the Nursing Research Unit (NRU). The standard was distributed to every clinical area and 192 nurses were surveyed to evaluate its impact on their awareness of educational opportunities, their use of the consultancy and support service, their use of other support services, their research utilization and research quality. Results. The survey demonstrated that the implementation of the standard had increased awareness related to both formal and informal educational and research opportunities. It identified current nurses' strengths and weaknesses relative to all aspects of the research process, particularly in obtaining ethical approval for studies. A rolling programme of research education enabled nurses to gain essential knowledge and skills in supporting their developing research awareness, consumption and conduct of research. Relevance to clinical practice. The NRU, through this process, has formed an effective alliance between clinical nurses and research facilitators in promoting high quality research. The foundations to continue to support this within the Trust are now well established.
引用
收藏
页码:418 / 425
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] An Audit to Assess Nicotine Management on a Mental Health Rehabilitation Unit in Mersey Care NHS Foundation Trust
    Baruah, Ranjan
    Popoola, Olusegun
    Gilbey, Sion
    Pentz, Oliver
    BJPSYCH OPEN, 2024, 10 : S219 - S219
  • [42] An Audit to Assess Nicotine Management on a Mental Health Rehabilitation Unit in Mersey Care NHS Foundation Trust
    Baruah, Ranjan
    Popoola, Olusegun
    Gilbey, Sion
    Pentz, Oliver
    BJPSYCH OPEN, 2024, 10 : S219 - S219
  • [43] The Evidence-Based Development of an Intervention to Improve Clinical Health Literacy Practice
    Rowlands, Gill
    Tabassum, Bimasal
    Campbell, Paul
    Harvey, Sandy
    Vaittinen, Anu
    Stobbart, Lynne
    Thomson, Richard
    Wardle-McLeish, Mandy
    Protheroe, Joanne
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 17 (05)
  • [44] Post-Diagnostic Cardiac Catheterization Development and Evaluation of an Evidence-Based Standard of Care
    Harper, John P.
    JOURNAL FOR NURSES IN PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT, 2007, 23 (06) : 271 - 276
  • [45] The Australian Centre for Evidence-based Clinical Practice generic audit tool: Auditmaker for health professionals
    Shakib, S
    Phillips, PA
    JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2003, 9 (02) : 259 - 263
  • [46] Health program evaluation and evidence-based health care
    Toyntas, Y.
    Economou, N. A.
    ARCHIVES OF HELLENIC MEDICINE, 2007, 24 (01): : 22 - 33
  • [47] Implementation of evidence-based health care using action research: An emancipatory approach
    Cordeiro, Luciana
    Soares, Cassia Baldini
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING PRACTICE, 2016, 22 (04) : 333 - 338
  • [48] Using qualitative research to enhance the evidence-based practice of health care providers
    Ritchie, JE
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOTHERAPY, 1999, 45 (04): : 251 - 256
  • [49] Evidence-based health care 2004: AHRQ moves research to translation and implementation
    Clancy, CM
    Slutsky, JR
    Patton, LT
    HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2004, 39 (05) : XV - XXIII
  • [50] Evidence-based primary health care workforce reforms: priority areas for research
    Naccarella, Lucio
    Brooks, Peter M.
    Newton, Bill
    Butler, Danielle
    MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2011, 194 (03) : 109 - 110