Mode choice with latent preference heterogeneity: a case study for employees of the EU institutions in Luxembourg

被引:18
|
作者
Ma, Tai-Yu [1 ]
Gerber, Philippe [1 ]
Carpentier, Samuel [2 ]
Klein, Sylvain [1 ]
机构
[1] LISER, L-4364 Esch Sur Alzette, Luxembourg
[2] Aix Marseille Univ, Avignon Univ, Univ Nice Sophia Antipolis, CNRS,ESPACE,UMR 7300, F-06204 Nice, France
关键词
heterogeneity; mode choice; attitude; latent class; Luxembourg; MIXED LOGIT MODEL; TRAVEL BEHAVIOR; BUILT ENVIRONMENT; ATTITUDES;
D O I
10.1080/23249935.2015.1007175
中图分类号
U [交通运输];
学科分类号
08 ; 0823 ;
摘要
In this study, we apply a latent class choice modelling approach to the employees of the European Investment Bank and the Court of Justice of the European Union in Luxembourg to investigate commuting mode choice behaviour by incorporating individual preference heterogeneity. We found a two-segment preference differentiation of mode choice behaviour determined by their household locations, attitudes towards transport modes as well as their socio-demographic characteristics. Validity and overall goodness-of-fit are compared with a conditional multinomial Logit model. The empirical study confirmed that travel time and the availability of free parking are the two major determinants for Luxembourg residents with respect to their commuting trips by car. The sensitivity analysis indicates that reducing travel time in public transport could be an efficient way to shift car users towards public transport. The results provide useful insights to evaluate the effect of determinants on individual commuting mode choice behaviour for different preference groups.
引用
收藏
页码:441 / 463
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Analysing freight shippers' mode choice preference heterogeneity using latent class modelling
    Kim, Hyun-Chan
    Nicholson, Alan
    Kusumastuti, Diana
    WORLD CONFERENCE ON TRANSPORT RESEARCH - WCTR 2016, 2017, 25 : 1109 - 1125
  • [2] Mode choice with latent availability and consideration: Theory and a case study
    Calastri, Chiara
    Hess, Stephane
    Choudhury, Charisma
    Daly, Andrew
    Gabrielli, Lorenzo
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART B-METHODOLOGICAL, 2019, 123 : 374 - 385
  • [3] Lifecycle stages and residential location choice in the presence of latent preference heterogeneity
    Smith, Brett
    Olaru, Doina
    ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING A-ECONOMY AND SPACE, 2013, 45 (10): : 2495 - 2514
  • [4] Compact development and preference heterogeneity in residential location choice behaviour: A latent class analysis
    Liao, Felix Haifeng
    Farber, Steven
    Ewing, Reid
    URBAN STUDIES, 2015, 52 (02) : 314 - 337
  • [5] Bayesian networks for multimodal mode choice behavior modelling: a case study for the cross border workers of Luxembourg
    Ma, Tai-Yu
    18TH EURO WORKING GROUP ON TRANSPORTATION, EWGT 2015, 2015, 10 : 870 - 880
  • [6] Geographic, social-cultural and modal usage determinants of activity space: a case study of EU Institutions in Luxembourg and Strasbourg
    Ma, Tai-Yu
    Gerber, Philippe
    Carpentier, Samuel
    Klein, Sylvain
    17TH MEETING OF THE EURO WORKING GROUP ON TRANSPORTATION, EWGT2014, 2014, 3 : 109 - 118
  • [7] Accommodating preference heterogeneity in commuting mode choice: an empirical investigation in Shaoxing, China
    Fu, Xuemei
    Juan, Zhicai
    TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AND TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 40 (04) : 434 - 448
  • [8] Preference heterogeneity in mode choice for car-sharing and shared automated vehicles
    Zhou, Fan
    Zheng, Zuduo
    Whitehead, Jake
    Washington, Simon
    Perrons, Robert K.
    Page, Lionel
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2020, 132 : 633 - 650
  • [9] Preference heterogeneity in mode choice based on a nationwide survey with a focus on urban rail
    Zheng, Zuduo
    Washington, Simon
    Hyland, Paul
    Sloan, Keith
    Liu, Yulin
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2016, 91 : 178 - 194
  • [10] Quantifying preference heterogeneity in transit service desired quality using a latent class choice model
    Eldeeb, Gamal
    Mohamed, Moataz
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2020, 139 : 119 - 133