Comparison of Semirigorous and Empirical Models Derived Using Data Quality Assessment Methods

被引:2
|
作者
Brooks, Kevin [1 ]
le Roux, Derik [2 ]
Shardt, Yuri A. W. [3 ]
Steyn, Chris [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Witwatersrand, Sch Chem & Met Engn, ZA-2000 Johannesburg, South Africa
[2] Univ Pretoria, Dept Elect Elect & Comp Engn, ZA-0002 Pretoria, South Africa
[3] Tech Univ Ilmenau, Dept Automat Engn, D-99084 Ilmenau, Germany
[4] Anglo Amer, ZA-2000 Johannesburg, South Africa
关键词
data quality assessment; modeling; advanced process control; comminution; PREDICTIVE CONTROL; ANALYTICS;
D O I
10.3390/min11090954
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
With the increase in available data and the stricter control requirements for mineral processes, the development of automated methods for data processing and model creation are becoming increasingly important. In this paper, the application of data quality assessment methods for the development of semirigorous and empirical models of a primary milling circuit in a platinum concentrator plant is investigated to determine their validity and how best to handle multivariate input data. The data set used consists of both routine operating data and planned step tests. Applying the data quality assessment method to this data set, it was seen that selecting the appropriate subset of variables for multivariate assessment was difficult. However, it was shown that it was possible to identify regions of sufficient value for modeling. Using the identified data, it was possible to fit empirical linear models and a semirigorous nonlinear model. As expected, models obtained from the routine operating data were, in general, worse than those obtained from the planned step tests. However, using the models obtained from routine operating data as the initial seed models for the automated advanced process control methods would be extremely helpful. Therefore, it can be concluded that the data quality assessment method was able to extract and identify regions sufficient and acceptable for modeling.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] An Empirical Comparison of Multiple Imputation Methods for Categorical Data
    Akande, Olanrewaju
    Li, Fan
    Reiter, Jerome
    AMERICAN STATISTICIAN, 2017, 71 (02): : 162 - 170
  • [12] New production in the equatorial Pacific: a comparison of field data with estimates derived from empirical and theoretical models
    Laws, EA
    DEEP-SEA RESEARCH PART I-OCEANOGRAPHIC RESEARCH PAPERS, 2004, 51 (02) : 205 - 211
  • [13] An Empirical Comparison of Methods to Produce Business Statistics Using Non-Probability Data
    Ang, Lyndon
    Clark, Robert
    Loong, Bronwyn
    Holmberg, Anders
    JOURNAL OF OFFICIAL STATISTICS, 2025, 41 (01) : 3 - 34
  • [14] Improving the quality of data models: empirical validation of a quality management framework
    Moody, DL
    Shanks, GG
    INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2003, 28 (06) : 619 - 650
  • [15] Comparison of methods for the simplification of mesh models using quality indices and an observer study
    Silva, Samuel
    Madeira, Joaquim
    Ferreira, Carlos
    Santos, Beatriz Sousa
    HUMAN VISION AND ELECTRONIC IMAGING XII, 2007, 6492
  • [16] Empirical modeling methods using partial data
    Stenbakken, G
    Liu, HK
    Hwang, G
    IMTC 2002: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 19TH IEEE INSTRUMENTATION AND MEASUREMENT TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE, VOLS 1 & 2, 2002, : 875 - 879
  • [17] Empirical modeling methods using partial data
    Stenbakken, GN
    Liu, HK
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INSTRUMENTATION AND MEASUREMENT, 2004, 53 (02) : 271 - 276
  • [18] A COMPARISON OF 2 QUALITY ASSESSMENT METHODS FOR EMULSIONS
    PATHER, SI
    NEAU, SH
    PATHER, S
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL AND BIOMEDICAL ANALYSIS, 1995, 13 (10) : 1283 - 1289
  • [19] An empirical comparison of expert-derived and data-derived classification trees
    Chiogna, M
    Spiegelhalter, DJ
    Franklin, RCG
    Bull, K
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1996, 15 (02) : 157 - 169
  • [20] A comparison of methods of fitting models to twin data
    Huggins, RM
    Loesch, DZ
    Hoang, NH
    AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF STATISTICS, 1998, 40 (02) : 129 - 140